hat X was working 3-4 days before, problably X's
problems start after a make world. I installed 4.6.2 and it was working
fine, then after 1 or 2 world rebuilds, problems start to appear.
I'm running STABLE
AMD XP 2000
ASUS A7V333 - BIOS 1007
Abit G4 MX 440
Santos
To Unsubscribe:
bJDV?q=0";>Click
here to accept
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/mash/gr/photo_bg.gif)
-6px -2px no-repeat;padding:5px;">
http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/DCEFZAFBVVJVJ5URVNPRIZ2W7Q";>http://l.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/identity/nopic_192.gif"; border="0&q
Hi, my name is Hugo Santos Dias, living in Brazil in Vitoria da Conquista,
Bahia, I have great interest in helping in the development and testing of
versions of FreeBSD, I use FreeBSD on my desktop and my servers.
I am a student of computer science at the UESB - Universidade Estadual do
Sudoeste
Hi,
I just noticed that scripts in /etc/daily.local, /etc/weekly.local, etc,
never run.
The reason seems to be that the /etc/periodic/daily/999.local and similar
scripts use "for script in $daily_local". Because the variable $daily_local
is initialized in /etc/defaults/periodic.conf to /etc/daily
Subject: Re: File system is Full
> Thanks for you all.
> /tmp & /home are separate slices. However, I noticed that mounting msdosfs
> on another HD are sucking much of my FBSD HD. So I commented those on fstab
> to free space . It seems that this situation was also connected with the
> upgrade
> Anyone else seeing make buildworld stop at usr.bin/netstat/ ?
I didn't compile. That file was changed yesterday. But by the looks of it,
everybody will be seeing it.
The compiler is right because u_quad_t is not unsigned long long on the amd64,
but only unsigned long, which although being the s
> From: "Chaminda Indrajith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Warning: Can't find the `6.2-RELEASE-p4' distribution on this FTP
> server. You may need to visit a different server for the release you
> are trying to fetch or go to the Options menu and to set the release
> name to explicitly match what's
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 16 22:01:02 2007
>
> I should just be able to change the TAG in standard-supfile from 6_1 to 6_2,
> do a cvsup, and the builds etc to end up with 6.2-RELEASE right?
> yes? no?
Right. And back, you can change the tag back to 6_1... Or just RELENG_6 for
6-STABLE.
Hi,
I'm having problems burning CDs with nautilus-cd-burner. atapicam is ok,
/etc/devfs.rules is ok, I can burn CDs with cdrecord.
I can burn a CD after I have an image file with:
nautilus-cd-burner --source-iso=...
I can produce an image file by dropping everything into burn:/// and then
selec
> From: Holger Kipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 01:35:08AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:20:11PM +0100, Holger Kipp wrote:
> >
> > > > # unixtime=1193511599
> > > > # LC_ALL=C TZ=Asia/Krasnoyarsk date -jr $unixtime
> > > > Sun Oct 28 02:59:59 KRAT
> From: "David Yeske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Is there a way to determine the supported interface speed of a
> particular driver? If I have a gigabit ethernet device connected to a
> 100baseTX switch, how can I determine the interface supports gigabit
> ethernet? I have tried parsing the followin
> From: Holger Kipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 01:35:08AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 07:20:11PM +0100, Holger Kipp wrote:
> >
> > > > # unixtime=1193511599
> > > > # LC_ALL=C TZ=Asia/Krasnoyarsk date -jr $unixtime
> > > > Sun Oct 28 02:59:59 KRAT
> From: Mike Pritchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
[...]
> DST/CST time changes when setting the time backwards has been at your
> own risk for a long time.
Yes, but there's really not much reason for it to be so much of a black art.
Actually, I think the old behaviour, prior to rev 1.36, although not i
> From: Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi, I have a very simple program:
>
>
> int
> main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> if(atof("3.2") == atof("3.200"))
> puts("They are equal");
> else
> puts("They are N
> From: James Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Ifconfig with rc.conf Broken
>
> Don't alias interfaces have to be added to the "network_interfaces=" line?
> I thought only "real" interfaces were autodetected...
I don't think this is the case. It shouldn't be...
But MC can test that using
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 22 09:33:12 2006
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:07:36 -0800
> From: MC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Remote tunefs -n enable
>
> Hello again
>
> I have another issue on the same box. The bloke who installed FreeBSD 6.0onto
> the machi
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 24 09:48:08 2006
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:47:18 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: rip2 ospf: freebsd 6.0
>
> hi liste
>
> I'm looking for a dynamic routing (rip2, ospf) solution under freebsd
> 6.0. currently, I've alway
> So, rpc.lockd _is_ needed on the client?
> What about the statement in rc.conf(5) then, claiming it was
> only started on servers?
Yes rpc.lockd and rpc.statd are needed on the client.
I suspect it's the statements in rc.conf(5) that are wrong.
Miguel
___
> > 1- Only one client machine of all I have, the only one which is remote
> > booted, hangs on startup with rpc.lockd/rpc.statd enabled.
>
> Just to verify: lockd is enabled on BOTH client AND server?
>
> Kris
Oh yes. If any of the daemons is not enabled on both machines there's no
locking, ther
> OK, thanks. Please try to obtain a tcpdump -vvv trace of the broken
> operation.
>
> Kris
Will you help me? I've been trying to use tcpdump -vvv on this but I get
either a lot of trash or nothing. Which ports should I dump?
So far I tried running on the server
# tcpdump -vvv 'host and (udp po
> OK, thanks. Please try to obtain a tcpdump -vvv trace of the broken
> operation.
>
> Kris
I have it. I had just to disable cron startup, which was the only daemon
that used pidfile_open and started after statd/lockd, and then start it
by hand.
Now, perhaps it is better to post it off-list, sin
> Can you put it at a URL somewhere? If not, send it privately.
>
> Kris
Ok. There are two versions:
http://mega.ist.utl.pt/~mlsr/nfs.dump
is the output of tcpdump -vvv host targa and udp port nfs
http://mega.ist.utl.pt/~mlsr/nfsx.dump
is the output of tcpdump -X -vvv host
> From: Benjamin Sher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Can't boot into setup to install FreeBSD 6
>
> Dear Miguel:
>
> Thank you so very much for trying to help. My answers below:
>
> > I think this is a bit off-topic on this list, but of course I'd like to
> > help.
> > I don't think this can b
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rpc.lockd brokenness (2)
>
> > Ok. There are two versions:
> > http://mega.ist.utl.pt/~mlsr/nfs.dump
> > is the output of tcpdump -vvv host targa and udp port nfs
> > http://mega.ist.utl.pt/~mlsr/nfsx.dump
> > is the o
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rpc.lockd brokenness (2)
>
[...]
> but there's no evidence in the trace that it ever tries to write. Can
> you also obtain a ktrace -i dump from cron?
The file remains empty.
I really don't know enough about NFS, but isn't that getattr mess
> From: "Nick Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Remote Installworld
>
> >I'm currently administering a machine about 1500mi from me with nobody
> >local to the machine to assist me. Anyways, my only access to this
> >machine is via SSH, no remote serial console or anything.
> >
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rpc.lockd brokenness (2)
>
> I wonder if something else is going wrong and it's not rpc.lockd at
> all.
Oh, it's a locking problem alright. But perhaps not in rpc.lockd...
> It looks like this wasn't made using -s 0 - sorry if I wasn't
> ex
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rpc.lockd brokenness (2)
>
> This is intentional. It's how pidfile_*() tests whether the process
> is still running. The intention is that if someone tries to open the
> pidfile again while the first process is still running, the lock
> acq
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rpc.lockd brokenness (2)
>
[...]
> OK, I misunderstood. The rc.d script will signal cron to kill it,
> which should be closing the file descriptors and causing rpc.lockd to
> release the lock. Perhaps this part is broken. OK, I tested this
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The bug is triggered because the file is locked in the parent
> (i.e. the daemon process, which creates the pidfile) but unlocked by
> the child after the fork (in this case, when the child is killed). On
> the server, rpc.lockd compares the svid (=3D
> From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rpc.lockd brokenness (2)
>
> Yeah, the file is still locked on the server, and will never be
> unlocked unless you stop and restart the rpc.lockd on the server
> (which releases all the locks it holds).
I did that. Lots of times. And I remov
> Can you try to narrow down this problem some more? e.g. look up the
> port used by rpc.lockd with rpcinfo on client and server and tcpdump
> to see what locking requests are being passed back and forth (you
> should see the request from client -> server and the reply granting
> the lock; or not
> From: victoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: /usr/local/etc/rc.d script problem
>
> Hi to everyone!
>
> Seems i got a small problem with my startup scripts. I have record
> in /etc/rc.conf: local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d"
You shouldn't need that option, since the default value in
/etc/defau
> I did some further testing and it turns out that rpc.lockd is broken
> in some cases when operating over NFSv2 (this is the default for nfs
> root mounts).
>
> Tracing the lock traffic I see the client making a request, the server
> replying but the client never acting on the reply (or never rece
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[...]
> If you want to shape the future of the project, then participate in the places
> where the future is shaped. If you want to know what's coming up in the
> future,
> then watch the places where the future is shaped. If you don't do eit
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Harald Weis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyone out there who has installed FreeBSD on the above Sony
> laptop ?
>
> Both ''cat filename > /dev/dsp0.0'' or ''vlc cdda:///dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> are OK.
>
> If I run ''cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 play'', there is
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Harald Weis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 09:17:40PM -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Harald Weis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA33
>
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 11:32 -0600, Dan Allen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 4 Sep 2008, at 10:29 AM, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>>>
This is supported by the iwn(4) driver in CURRENT, and it should b
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>
>> Did you try using Alexander Motin's new snd_hda patches? They are
>> available at
>>
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/
>&
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just upgraded a RELENG_7 (amd64) box from 20080714 to "latest"
> (which seems to be from a few days ago--no changes from Monday
> morning's csup to today's) and can no longer see the effect of writing
> to /dev/console as no
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just upgraded a RELENG_7 (amd64) box from 20080714 to "latest"
>> (which seems to be from a
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:53 PM, lhmwzy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think port HAMMER fs to FreeBSD is easier than any other fs like ZFS.
> Would anybody do this?
> I do not have the skill or I will do this.:)
> links: http://www.dragonflybsd.org/hammer/index.shtml
> http://www.dragonfly
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just upgraded a RELENG_7 (amd64) box from 20080714 to "latest"
>> (which seems to be from a
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:23 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 03:16:37AM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 10,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:23:53PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> > The ioctl call fails (EPERM) because only superuser can use TIOCCONS,
>> > regardless the ownership of the device. Using xterm with the "-C"
>> > argum
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Peter Jeremy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-Nov-25 12:09:07 -0800, David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I was running the recently-tagged RELENG_7_1 on my laptop, doing stuff
>>involving switching among a small handful of xterms, when the mouse
>>becam
Hi
# uname -a
FreeBSD avatar 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #2: Wed Dec 23 13:41:06
BRST 2009 r...@avatar:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Compaq_nx6320 amd64
# ls -l /usr/sbin/usbdevs
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8320 27 Jan 2009 /usr/sbin/usbdevs
Is there any reason to keep usbdevs installed now that 8.
nomic Observatory for time reference.
-- Forwarded message --
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 22, 2008 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: bin/119884: Make sysinstall use the new Brazillian ntp servers
To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thank you very much for
atapi_dma="1"
in /boot/loader.conf would be enough to enable DMA mode. In fact I'm
pretty sure it used to be in previous versions of FreeBSD. I created a
/etc/rc.local containing
#!/bin/sh -
atacontrol mode acd0 udma33
Two questions, now:
1. Is this related to using atapicam?
2. Should this be considered a bug?
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Feb 8, 2008 4:27 AM, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> > On Feb 6, 2008 5:45 PM, Dominic Fandrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> >>> Hi, Dominic--
> >>>
ed RAID disabled
> ad4: 190782MB at ata2-master SATA150
> ad6: 190782MB at ata3-master SATA150
>
> OS installed on /dev/ad4 and OS was booted with verbose logging enabled:
>
> FreeBSD 7.0-RC2 FreeBSD 7.0-RC2 #0: Fri Feb 8 00:09:57 UTC 2008 [EMAIL
> PROTECTE
On Feb 17, 2008 3:19 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:08:38PM -0200, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> > On Feb 16, 2008 7:07 PM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is anyone aware of the situation where Fr
On Feb 17, 2008 4:25 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 17.02.08, 02:08, "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > precautions prior to yanking the disk. Upon reinsertion, the system
>
> > > found the disk and I
t debug support, if debugging if
not useful for you. I use to do this in "production" machines.
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
Specification? Is
there any agreement with IEEE or Open Group allowing to cut-and-paste
from, say,
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/aio_fsync.html?
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
tml
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-drivers/2006-September/000248.html
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
submitting a PR.
Thanks in advance.
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
burncd_eject.patch
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I attempted this:
# mkdir /dev/foo
mkdir: /dev/foo: Operation not supported
Any suggestions (besides creating it elsewhere, of course)?
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On May 21, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>
>> I attempted this:
>>
>># mkdir /dev/foo
>>mkdir: /dev/foo: Operation not supported
>>
>> Any su
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlos A. M. dos Santos <> wrote:
> > I attempted this:
> >
> > # mkdir /dev/foo
> > mkdir: /dev/foo: Operation not supported
>
> DEVFS is a "virtual&quo
about submitting a PR with a change request but I'd like
to get some additional opinions first. I did not test it in "batch"
mode, so it would be great if any kind soul did this.
Thanks in advance for your comments and/or suggestions.
--
Carlos A. M. dos Santos
sysinstall-64kcyl.diff
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:52:06PM -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
>> I have been struglling with sysinstall, attempting to make it handle
>> the geometry of some large SATA drives. Af
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:27 AM, M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :
> : On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 09:18 -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> : > On Sun, Mar 30, 200
Hello,
I'm attempting quad-boot my notebook with STABLE and CURRENT, both
i386 and AMD64. I installed them manually by booting from a thumb
drive, partitioning the hard disk and extracting the distributions
from ISO images that I had stored on an external hard drive. My disk
layout is as follows:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Kevin K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:31:37 -0400
>> Kevin K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > For 7.0-RELEASE, it
>> > seemed to hang at "Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/md0".
>>
>> How long did you wait? If you didn't wait 10 or 15 minut
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 1:21 AM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Carlos,
>&
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 2/24/09, SDH Support wrote:
>>
>>> I tried using my ath based D-Link DWL G650, which still seems to have
>>> some issues in regard to interrupt handling:
>>
>>
>> I've been able to get /most/ wireless cards working with ndiswrapper.
>
> *
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Sagara Wijetunga wrote:
> Roland Smith writes:
>> It could be a hardware problem. Signal 11 can be a sign of bad memory.
>> Can you reproduce the problem on multiple machines?
>
> I have taken the hard disk out and fixed on different machines, the symptoms
> are stil
68 matches
Mail list logo
