On Tue, Oct 14, 2008, at 22:28:58 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> Patches have been committed to CURRENT and should have been MFC'ed
> last weekend, but haven't for some reason.
>
> The port has a PR waiting for maintainer feedback:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=127839
>
> The relev
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, at 23:05:26 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:25:37PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm using RELENG_7 as of yesterday which appears to have the
> > linprocfs fixes from CURRENT, and I also updated linux-flas
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, at 16:52:35 -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> I had something like that until I smacked my forehead after a few
> hours and realized I had not added linprocfs to /etc/fstab. That may
> be your problem at least with nspluginwrapper.
>
> Sean
linprocfs was indeed not mounted, so
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006, at 18:30:52 +0200, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> Hi all!
> I would like to hear opinion of pc card
> choice for laptop and atheros chip:
> netgear wag511
> d-link dwl-ag650
> linksys wpc55ag
> Good and bad. Prior to make idiot of me
> and buy wrong.
>
> Zoran
Hi.
I
Hi everyone.
I rebooted my machine today and when it came back up and I tried to
load the snd_emu10k1 kernel module, the machine hung without returning
to the prompt. I tried waiting 5-10+ minutes and it was totally
irrecoverable. At that point, nothing had changed since the last
reboot so it was
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006, at 19:32:39 -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I rebooted my machine today and when it came back up and I tried to
> load the snd_emu10k1 kernel module, the machine hung without returning
> to the prompt. I tried waiting 5-10+ minutes and
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006, at 12:38:58 +0200, Joel Dahl wrote:
> So, loading snd_emu10k1 worked before the last rebuild? Could you
> perhaps do a binary search and try to narrow it down to a specific
> commit?
On September 21, I rebuilt world/kernel and did the normal update
procedure. The module load
Hi everyone.
I'm getting kernel panics daily or even multiple times a day on a new
machine. When it's running everything works well, but over the last day
or two I've been getting multiple panics per day at seemingly random
times.
When the first panic happened, all I did was open up a new tab in
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007, at 22:14:50 -0600, Mark Kane wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I'm getting kernel panics daily or even multiple times a day on a new
> machine. When it's running everything works well, but over the last
> day or two I've been getting multiple panics
Tobias Kilb wrote:
Hi guys,
has anyone the link for the FreeBSD 6.1 Schedule Page (Open
Tasks, Bugs, etc...). I can't find the link
thanks,
Tobias
Here it is:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/
-Mark
--
GnuPG Public Key:
http://www.mkproductions.org/mk_pubkey.asc
Internet Radio:
Part
Jared wrote:
Hi -stable!
I'd like to bring something to the attention of -stable that was posted
to -amd64 but has not yet being resolved:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=amd64/95554
I'm unable to test to see if this occurs on i386 aswell so am unsure if
this is the right list to
Mike Jakubik wrote:
Rong-en Fan wrote:
On 5/23/06, Dmitriy Kirhlarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, list.
Some time ago quota and, AFAIR, snapshots in 6.1-RELEASE has deadlock
problems. What the current situation with this? I'm ready to test
patches, if needed.
WBR
IIRC, there are some quot
I've been having similar problems on 5.4-RELEASE. I have a brand new
board back from the factory (a RMA) and had a thread going on
freebsd-questions about this.
I currently have six Maxtor 7200RPM ATA133 hard drives that I've been
trying on and off and with various configurations in my 5.4-REL
Mike Tancsa wrote:
Yes, I have had Maxtor drives in the past where they would not work
properly at certain bus speeds-- even back in the RELENG_4 days. Also,
doesnt UDMA133 assume no slave ?
I would just run them at 100. I dont think you would see much of a
difference anyways. Perhaps Soer
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Mark Kane wrote:
I do have a tall Antec case, and have both 200's and the 160 in 5 1/4
inch trays so the cables for those are long (36 inches IIRC).
Hmm - 36 inch cable, makes me wonder if that is what is causing the
problem in UDMA133 mode. IIRC the ATA spec sa
Mark Kane wrote:
I'm glad that it looks like running it at 100 will solve this. Thanks
for the replies. I was probably going to go through all the hassle of
getting an Asus board to replace this because I was almost certain it
was hardware, but I don't think it's worth it as lon
Bill Nicholls wrote:
> Let me add my voice to this discussion. I have been a happy user of
> FreeBSD from 4.0 thru 4.11, but have stumbled repeatedly on 5.x and now
> 6.0.
>
> For some reason, I can get these (5 & 6) installed, but not stable or
> running KDE, yet 4.11 runs solid for months. In ad
17 matches
Mail list logo
