Re: apache-1.3.19 segfaulting on FreeBSD-4.3 RC

2001-04-02 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
ch-util.c > > > - Original Message - > From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ron Klinkien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Dan Larsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "FreeBSD Stable List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sen

Re: Network performance question

2001-04-03 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Mike Smith([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.02 16:15:23 +: > It's a reasonable assumption; it sounds like you haven't tuned the > FreeBSD box very well, so it's doing a lot of disk I/O. > > > I tried the test under FreeBSD with the NetGear card too - in addition to > > the 3COM. It's kinda strange

Re: apache-1.3.19 segfaulting on FreeBSD-4.3 RC

2001-04-03 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
them that apache's base path is not /usr/local but /opt/apache? /k David W. Chapman Jr.([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.02 10:55:12 +: > > * Karsten W. Rohrbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010402 01:17]: > > > it seems. i installed the patch (my apache is NOT built from ports

4.3-RC2 install freezes on sony vaio c1xd

2001-04-14 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
i have strange things happening when trying to run a freebsd install from boot floppies on my vaio c1xd. the kern.flp will find a loader and load the kernel, then ask me for the mfsroot.flp which also gets read in without a problem (the floppy on the vaio is a y-e flashbuster usb device which has

Re: Running Stable on remote production server

2001-05-14 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Stephen Hilton([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.13 10:57:03 +: > Subject: Re: Running Stable on remote production server > > How can you accomplish the single user installworld steps on a remote system ? > Especially the mergemaster program that involves interactive routines ? > I would be using SS

Re: Running Stable on remote production server

2001-05-14 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Juha Saarinen([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.14 08:12:07 +: > On Sun, 13 May 2001, Stephen Hilton wrote: > > > How can you accomplish the single user installworld steps on a remote system ? > > Especially the mergemaster program that involves interactive routines ? > > I would be using SSH to con

Re: building apache from /usr/ports

2001-06-06 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
g of the difference between in-core and modules. i think this is correct. /k > > Regards, > /calvin > > lines with :> are quotes from Mike Meyer's email > :> Karsten W. Rohrbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > :> > you won't recognize it until you have to

Re: building apache from /usr/ports

2001-06-07 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Mike Meyer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.06 12:32:02 +: > Calvin NG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > > Correct me if I m wrong. > > For in-core web server , every copy of server loaded has the perl and/or php > > in it. For modules, its a shared library, the server is smaller size, and only >

Re: IPFilter licence update

2001-06-07 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Brian Behlendorf([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.06 22:21:29 +: > On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > I removed Darren from the CC list as I don't think he really needs to be > > in on this discussion > > > > On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > > > > While meaning no dis

Re: /var/mail permissions: 0755 or 01777 ?

2001-06-22 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Nick Sayer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.22 09:45:47 +: > > > Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > > > Nuno Teixeira([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.21 21:51:34 +: > > > >>Hello to all, > >> > >>The FreeBSD default permissions for /var/mail are 0755

Re: BIND-9.x

2001-07-02 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Dan Larsson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.02 14:33:33 +: > What are the plans regarding updating to BIND version 9 bind should be made a port, IMHO, and take it's way out of the base system, being replaced by an asynchronous resolver library (there are many). bind9 already is a port, btw /k >

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail 8.12.2 MFC'ed

2002-03-26 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Helge Oldach([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.26 23:26:57 +: [...] > standard, well- and widely-known piece of software around. You may not > like it but both S*** and B*** are the de facto standards. Period. they are not, but this is not the issue. "it is just convenient to have emacs in the b

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail 8.12.2 MFC'ed

2002-03-27 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Helge Oldach([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.27 09:15:42 +: > Karsten W. Rohrbach: > >Helge Oldach([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.26 23:26:57 +: > >[...] > >> standard, well- and widely-known piece of software around. You may not > >> like it but both S*** an

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail 8.12.2 MFC'ed

2002-03-27 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
no text deleted, everything quoted, not reformatted, no information removed. please, read on. Helge Oldach([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.27 09:36:19 +: > Yeasah Pell: > >The question is > >simply this: why are there large, complex, non-BSD packages in src-contrib > >that are not critical to the

Re: Another possible solution for non-sendmail users

2002-03-28 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Scot W. Hetzel([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.28 14:49:49 +: > Qmail install shouldn't need to install anything into /usr/[sbin,bin] > directories with mailwrapper properly configured (see `man mailer.conf` & > 'man mailwrapper'). a quick glance into /usr/ports/mail/qmail/pkg-plist shows, that no

Re: *** HEAD'S UP ***

2002-04-24 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Doug Barton([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.04.23 21:58:34 +: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, JJ Behrens wrote: > > > I strongly disagree with your disagreement of his disagreement :)) Citing > > /etc/defaults/rc.conf once more: > > > > # The ${rc_conf_files} files should only contain values which override >

Re: ipfilter problem

2002-05-05 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Jens Rehsack([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.06 00:46:58 +: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > > > Michael Riexinger([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.05 15:32:04 +: > > > On Sun May 5 15:23:14 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > > > > the problem can o

Re: ipfilter problem

2002-05-06 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Jens Rehsack([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.06 15:04:14 +: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S/SA keep state > > # we want state added when establishing a > >

Re: conf/11376 still suspended

2002-05-10 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Kris Kennaway([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.10 17:01:09 +: > There's also the important point that -stable is entirely the wrong > list to be asking on, because it's a technical support list and not a > development list. one might note that there's the -qa mailing list which should hold discussi