Kris Kennaway([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.05.10 17:01:09 +0000: > There's also the important point that -stable is entirely the wrong > list to be asking on, because it's a technical support list and not a > development list.
one might note that there's the -qa mailing list which should hold discussion on issues pending a release, IIRC. the question is, if -stable isn't a bad choice either. i think that there are many more folks subscribed to -stable than to -qa, which might lead to more thorough tests through more folks involved in testing, when a problem got fixed, just as a sidenote. correct me if i'm wrong, but i don't have access to the subscriber lists, so this is just an assumption ;-) regards, /k -- > Should the US government lift the export controls on strong encryption? > Yes, I think so. You can buy better stuff in Europe than you can here. > We don't have a monopoly on brains. > --Interview with Walter Wriston as reported in Wired 4.10 WebMonster Community Project -- Next Generation Networks GmbH -- All on BSD http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/ GnuPG: 0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4 A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6 REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C 5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 10x
msg45131/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
