air several errors. Epecially, one error claims my
attention: SUPERBLOCK.
* After the theorical FS reparation I'm again in the point 1.
¿Any clues?
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
GENERIC exists, and is on the cvsup
mirrors.
Yes, of course. I've checked it from cvsweb.
Superblock problems wouldn't explain this; there are hundreds of
superblocks available (you wouldn't be able to use your machine if they
were all horked).
I've supposed it; your words
be it's so stupid as the first tag was miss-typed... but I think not.
I checked it several times.
I'ts solved, but I don't understand yet.
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
re shared-data layer... I
know it will be the optimal structure, but as I've said above, I can't
use it because various reasons.
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
e the "classical" method over "new" binary method because of my
kernel is customized.
PD2. I use -DINSTALL_NODEBUG flag because of my / partition is so small
and need to preserve the maximum space.
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi all,
I've configured a new disk with two journaled partitions (/var and
/usr). All works fine until this point.
Next I add a new disk and I set up a gmirror as I've done always without
problems.
But when I reboot the system, I always get a nasty 'mountroot' message.
I've cheched the gmirr
Hi all,
I get the next nasty error:
===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libopcodes (all)
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DBFD_DEFAULT_TARGET_SIZE=64 -I.
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libopcodes
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libopcodes/../libbfd
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils
Lowell Gilbert escribió:
Does it always happen in the same place (if not, it's a hardware
problem)?
Hi Lowel,
Yes, always at same point.
Does it happen the same way without the '-j' option (that can make the
output less useful)?
Wonderful. I've used times the same command (1) without -j f
# pfctl -sr | grep ssh_brutes
block drop quick from to any
pass quick on em1 inet proto tcp from any to xxx.xxx.xxx.0/23 port = ssh
flags S/SA keep state (source-track rule, max-src-conn 20,
max-src-conn-rate 3/12, overload flush global, src.track 12)
pass quick on em0 inet proto tcp from any
Hi all,
I've upgraded a FreeBSD box to 6.4 to 7.2; no problems here, all goes
fine as usual.
After the whole upgrade process I can't do ssh connections. Because of I
use ssh through LDAP, it involves also the PAM modules.
I've tried:
- repeat the whole upgrade process because of I didn't kno
You would probably need to reinstall the openldap-client package (and
any packages openldap-client depends on) as well as the pam_ldap and
nss-ldap packages.
- $ portupgrade -fR openldap-client
(-R flag implies the recompilation of openldap-client depenedent
packages as well)
CONCLUSION: no e
HI all,
I've realized that the nice(1) code hasn't been modified for a long time
(last code change seems from 4 years ago according the sources).
¿Is the nice(1) behaviour the expected? I mean, ¿Has been the ULE
scheduler adapted to nice(1) command or not?
nice(1) is a very old command base
In fact nice is a very simple program. It only changes the
priority value of a process in a POSIX-compliant way.
There is no need to change or adapt it; it still works fine
in the SMP world and with new schedulers. It's up to the
scheduler to interpret and handle the priority values of
processes
Hi all,
In Linux exists the ionice(1) for "get/set program io scheduling class
and priority".
In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if
I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not to
I/O.
¿Is there some ionice(1) equivalent in FreeBSD?
On 02/03/2010 12:12 PM, Bruce Simpson wrote:
On 02/02/2010 17:19, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
In FreeBSD we've nice(1), renice(8) and even rtprio, idprio(1) but if
I'm understanding correctly, they're related to CPU priorty only, not
to I/O.
That's not entirely true.
A t
HI all,
I'm hardening one test box and at present I'm planning to do:
# chflags -R schg
where will be some binaries that seems to be common targets for
rootkits and lammers:
ls
du
ps
find
top
locate
strings
ifconfig
netstat login
I wonder if changing these files permissions as I've shown
It's possible installworld will break (fail/exit) when trying to
overwrite some of these binaries. However...
install(1) supports the -f flags to specify what the destination file
should have its file flags (chflags) set to, and from looking at the
code (src/usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c), there a
Great aclarations. Thanks.
--
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that
brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass
over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner
eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone th
Great work Luigi ;)
That's amazing... anyway ¿is it production-ready?
--
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that
brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass
over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner
eye
Hi,
I wonder if is possible to configure the gmirror rebuild speed.
Neither I've found any related info in the net nor the man pages.
--
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings
total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and
To make it slower, I assume? When is that a good idea?
It depends on what status your server are.
For example:
- if I've a fsck in background so the I/O is high, maybe I want to make
it slower
- If the box is completey unloaded maybe I want to make it quicker
--
I must not fear. Fear is the
t helps someone (I'm very surprised that this isn't a
documented bug in 7.0 yet)
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
those
who have experienced such.
Yes Jeremy, I known. I also don't doubt your words, but in my case the
order of the extensions seems not any effect.
The only solution has been comment the mentioned mbash extension.
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
__
Some time ago I was crazy with this problem:
http://marc.info/?l=freebsd-amd64&m=119783171822355&w=2
Finally, it has been solved with upgrade from 6.2/6.3 to 7.0.
I've no idea why, but nowadays the reboots doesn't exist.
--
Thanks,
Jo
ww.nabble.com/Re:-Password-expiry-warning-message-from-ppolicy-td8071732.html
--
Thanks,
Jordi Espasa Clofent
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
(uid=postfix))"
filter="(&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=root))"
filter="(&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=postfix))"
You can see the difference between user 'oscar? (exists in LDAP ddbb)
and the others (doesn't exist in LDAP ddbb).
The main que
/src/sbin/
¿Can I use nscd in 6.x branch? ¿Is there some 'alternative'? I've read
about "cached" but I don't find anywhere in 6.3 (for example); the only
one reference I've found is the port /usr/ports/databases/memcached, but
I
27 matches
Mail list logo
