wonder on on earth could have changed that much between
7.0/7.1 Nice upgrade.. This should not happen on the same hardware!
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
+ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS sxce snv105 ++
+ All that's really worth doing is what we do for oth
uter is fast, but I want
to use it for someting useful iso compiling and compiling and..
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
he system faster, doesn't it?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
corrupted?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u4 08/07 ++
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ou can't change that. The maintainers run the show. It's their time
and their baby. And from one pov that's true. Users have to shut up
if not contributing big time.
I still think your questions are legitimate.
You won't win the battle however.
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG ke
was. It should have been posponed 'till some open bugs were
solved. I agree with you that a RELEASE is supposed to be more mature /
stable then a development version. And you state it is -not-
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D
++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++
__
- project like FreeBSD and
start developing products just for themselves.
You have developers in 'flavours'; you also have all sorts of users ;-)
> further discussion is just going to upset people even further. :)
Being/geeting upset is -always- ones own fault.
After all, it's only
ure.
If the above quotes are true, the writer should be ashamed of himself.
Your POV has stirred some dust ;-) But to call you names is weird.
BTW ever meet a sane person? And, did you like it?
Whatever my pov on you issues are I don't think people should start
insulting one another.
--
D
complaining that the version
> is too new.
Have you tried to send a snapshot on you Mac and receive that snapshot on
your FreeBSD machine?
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u5 05/08 ++
___
freebsd-stable
On 22 Sep Dominic Marks wrote:
> CyberSans AirBort wrote:
> >i have tested 6.2-BETA and the same problem still appear when i want to
> >install it into compaq evo desktop; BTX HALTED.
> Go into the BIOS, disable BIOS DMA transfers **. After that it will boot
> normally. I have about 20 EVOs, which
sing Blastwave. It takes some extra diskspace but with modern prices,
who cares..
--
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ http://nagual.nl/ | Solaris 10 11/06 ++
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:15:55 -0700
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Butler wrote:
> > What is the most recent version of VMware known to work on 6.x in
> > host mode so as to be able to run windoze as a guest?
> >
> > Anyone tried 5.5 on 6.x yet? .. or the time-limited beta (expire
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:32:09 -0400 (EDT)
Matt Juszczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For me, 5 days up time after switching from IPF to PF. Before the switch a
> > couple of hours of uptime was the maximum. Seems like the crashes are
> > caused
> > by ipfilter.
>
>
> Still same for me :) Up
On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:03:53 -0400
"Joshua Coombs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For what it's worth, on UP, my 386 (stop laughing) is showing twice
> the inbound and outbound tcp throughput across multiple apps compared
> to 4.11. Disk throughput is slightly higher, but nothing super
> impres
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 15:52:00 -0400
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2005, at 7:57 AM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > The *ONLY* question is: will I need to *recompile* all installed
> > ports if I go from 5.4 to 6.0 release?
>
> No, the ker
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:53:51 -0400
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:36:35PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> > COMPAT_FREEBSD5 is meant for running FreeBSD-5 binary applications.
> > If you have them it's ok. If you recompile everything you don't
> > need the COMPAT
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:30:52 -0400
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But he old libraries are still on the system than, aren't they?
> > Or will they not be used and if not, why?
>
> Use libchk and pkg_which..see their manpages.
After looking into the manual(s) this seems to be a "dan
My make.conf contains (fbsd-5.4)
CFLAGS= -O -pipe
COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe
Are these settings the same for the upcoming release6 or do I need to
set -O2 in this new version?
--
dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
++ Running FreeBSD 4.11-stable ++ FreeBSD 5.4
+ Nai tiruvantel ar vayuv
On 22 Oct Mike Jakubik wrote:
> On Sat, October 22, 2005 12:25 pm, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>
> > You can run make check-old in /usr/src.
> >
> Oops, it seems this feature is in 7-CURRENT only. If the appropiate
> person is reading this, why isnt something like that available in 6? I
> think it would
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:27:15 +0100
Philippe PEGON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken Menzel wrote:
> >> options INVARIANT_SUPPORT
> >>
> >> nooptions WITNESS
> >> nooptions WITNESS_SKIP_SPIN
> >
> >
> > If I include GENERIC can I comment out the following?
> > #cpuI486_CPU
> > #
I was and am a great fan of the burncd utility.
Very fast, simple and cli..
But as almost any new computer is supplied with a dvd drive this nice
program has become quit useless. It does not support those drives.
My question is: will it ever do?
I mean, cd-rom drives are losing terrain with each
On 05 Nov David Fleck wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2005, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >I never used burncd, but "/dev/acd0c" looks strange to me.
> >
> >The device is "/dev/acd0" and even the man page says
> >"burncd -f /dev/acd0 data file1 fixate".
>
> Not my manpage:
>
> EXAMPLES
> The typical usage for
On 09 Nov Paul Keusemann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 10:27:33PM -0600, Billy Newsom wrote:
> > See my posts and others on these topics:
> > critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4)
> > 5.3 -> 5.4 breaks ATA (Intel ICH2)
> > [PATCH] option to re-enable aggressive ATA probing
>
I used to be able to play (windows) mplayer2 files and *.mov files with
my native mozilla browser and mplayerplug-in installed. Lately that
does not work anymore. Mozilla just crashes, firefox starts up the
mplayerplug-in and than stops (hangs).
I don't know where to look. I reinstalled all relate
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:49:21 +0100
Melvyn Sopacua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2005 21:36, dick hoogendijk wrote:
>
> > I used to be able to play (windows) mplayer2 files and *.mov files
> > with my native mozilla browser and mplayerplug-in install
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:46:30 +0100
Melvyn Sopacua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2005 22:01, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:49:21 +0100
> >
> > Melvyn Sopacua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 20
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:28:03 -0700
"Wilde, Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Friday, I updated to latest 6-stable and did portupgrade --all
> successfully, however, I did not restart the system and X until this
> morning. The system boots to login properly, but will not startx to
> KDE. It lock
27 matches
Mail list logo
