tings, etc, I'm
happy to run them and include the results. We have lots of time to play
with this.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
On 1/8/2011 4:33 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Dan Langille mailto:d...@langille.org>> wrote:
I've been running a ZFS array for about 10 months on a system with
4GB of RAM. I'm about to add another 4GB of RAM.
I think this might
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull in a
hot spare if one is required.
This raised the issue back in March 2010, and refers to a PR opened in
May 2009
*
On 1/11/2011 11:10 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 11/01/2011 03:38, Dan Langille wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull
in a
hot spare if one is req
SyncID: 1
ID: 3585934016
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:50:01PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> System in question: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #3: Thu Mar 3 04:52:04 GMT 2011
>>
>> After a recent power failure, I'm seeing this in my logs:
>>
>
On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:39:17PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:50:01PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>> Syst
245828 secs (2822954 bytes/sec)
real13m0.256s
user0m22.087s
sys 3m24.215s
> Also i am highly recommending to setup smartd as daemon and to monitor number
> of relocated sectors. If they will grow again - then it is a good time to
> utilize
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:34:41PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:39:17PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> ...
>>>>
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Dan, I will respond to your reply sometime tomorrow. I do not have time
> to review the Email today (~7.7KBytes), but will have time tomorrow.
No worries. Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - http://langil
if both drives in your mirror were bought at the same time
> from the same place and have similar manufacturing plants/dates on
> them).
I'm happy to send you this drive for your experimentation pleasure.
If so, please email me an address offline. You don't have a disk with
:
from="10..etc"
appears before the key being used to log in, the message will appear.
Solution: move the from= line to the bottom of the file. Ugly, but it
works.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
ad14ONLINE 0 0 0
ad16ONLINE 0 0 0
Of course, always have good backups. ;)
In my case, this ZFS array is the backup. ;)
But I'm setting up a tape library, real soon now
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
On 7/21/2010 2:54 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, alan bryan wrote:
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Dan Langille wrote:
From: Dan Langille
Subject: Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool
To: "Freddie Cash"
Cc
On 7/19/2010 10:50 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I think it's because you pull the old drive, boot with the new drive,
the controller re-numbers all the devices (ie da3 is now da2, da2 is
now da1, da1 is now da0, da0 is now da6, etc), an
antage to using the -l option
on 'gpart add' instead of the glabel above?
Thanks
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 7/21/2010 11:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote (something close to this):
First, create a new GUID Partition Table partition scheme on the HDD:
gpart create -s GPT ad0
Let's see how much space we have. This output will be used to determine
SOMEVALUE in the next command.
gpart show
Create
device 17.0 on pci0
Which is the onboard SATA from what I can tell, not the controllers I
installed to handle the ZFS array. The onboard SATA runs a gmirror
array which handles /, /tmp, /usr, and /var (i.e. the OS). ZFS runs
only on on my /storage mount point.
--
Dan
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0: port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfbeffc00-0xfbeffc7f,0xfbef-0xfbef7fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci7
atapci1: port 0xac00-
On 7/22/2010 3:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:02:33AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0: port 0xdc00-
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0: port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfbeffc00-
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure o
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure o
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure o
.
I wonder if my friend Jerry has a spare 2TB HDD I could borrow for the
evening.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any ma
agically.
So... the smaller size won't mess things up...
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
t
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On 7/22/2010 8:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Thank you to all the helpful discussion. It's been very helpful and
educational. Based on the advice and suggestions, I'm going to adjust my
original plan as follows.
NOTE: glabel will not be used.
First, create a new GUID Partition Table
ems I have a 5-HDD zpool and it's going to stay that way.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 7/23/2010 10:25 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Pawell and I had an online chat about part of my strategy. To be clear:
I have a 5x2TB raidz1 array.
I have 2x2TB empty HDD
My goal was to go to raidz2 by:
- copy data to empty HDD
- redo the
G
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes transferred in 0.25 secs (0 bytes/sec)
$ ls -l /tmp/sparsefile1.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 2147483648000 Jul 23 22:49 /tmp/sparsefile1.img
$ ls -lh /tmp/sparsefile1.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 2.0T Jul 23 22:49 /tmp/sparsefile1.img
--
Dan Langille -
On 7/23/2010 10:51 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/23/2010 10:42 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 24/07/2010, at 11:55, Freddie Cash wrote:
It's theoretical as I have not investigated how to create sparse
files on FreeBSD, nor have I done this. It's based on several
posts to the zfs-
ke them trivial; note
that temporary disks 3 and 4 don't have to be 2TB, 1.5TB will do.
The lack of redundancy is noted and accepted. Thanks. :)
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
On 7/22/2010 4:11 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan
On 7/23/2010 7:42 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Thank you to all the helpful discussion. It's been very helpful and
educational. Based on the advice and suggestions, I'm going to adjust
my original plan as follows.
[ ... ]
Since I still have the medium-sized ZF
ng.
Full logs here, including a number of panics:
http://beta.freebsddiary.org/zfs-with-gpart.php
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsu
On 7/24/2010 10:44 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'll run -s 2 and -s 5 tests overnight and will post them in the
morning.
The -s 2 results are in:
-b 34:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per
On 7/24/2010 10:44 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
You may have seen my cunning plan:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=883310+0+current/freebsd-stable
I've been doing some testing today. The first of my tests comparing
partitions aligned on a 4KB boundary are in. I created a 5x2TB
corrupted
data
errors: No known data errors
Another attempt to destroy the array created a panic.
Suggestions as to how to remove this array and get started again?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
h
On 7/25/2010 1:58 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains
nothing of value.
Oh... I left this out:
FreeBSD kraken.unixathome.org 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Fri Mar
5 00:46:11 EST 2010
d...@kraken.example.org:/usr/obj/us
e found or current contents doesn't look like ZFS device.
Can you try moving current files to /tmp/sparsefile[34].img and then
readd them to the pool with zpool replace? One by one please.
I do not know what the above paragraph means.
--
Dan Langille - http
On 7/25/2010 4:49 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
25.07.2010 20:58, Dan Langille wrote:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
storage ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk01 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk02 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk03 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk04 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk05 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/sparsefile1.img
On 7/25/2010 1:58 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains
nothing of value.
# zpool status
pool: storage
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is
missing or
invalid. Sufficient replicas exis
22d09712b
label: disk05-live
length: 2000188135936
offset: 1048576
type: freebsd-zfs
index: 1
end: 3906619500
start: 2048
Consumers:
1. Name: ada5
Mediasize: 2000398934016 (1.8T)
Sectorsize: 512
Mode: r1w1e3
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
On 8/2/2010 7:11 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I recently altered an existing raidz2 pool from using 7 vdevs of about
931G to 1.81TB. In fact, the existing pool used half of each HDD. I then
wanted to go to using [almost] all of each HDD.
I offline'd each vdev, adjusted the HDD paritions using
-STABLE #1: Sun Aug 22 23:16:43
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory
k
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
k
On 8/23/2010 7:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/08/2010 02:43 Dan Langille said the following:
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory
k
On 8/24/2010 7:38 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:13:23PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel
? What is
your view on replacing DRAM? What do you conclude from the summary?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
This this something to be concerned about:
ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or length:
0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655)
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 8/28/2010 8:30 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
This this something to be concerned about:
ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or
length: 0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655)
CC'ing freebsd-acpi
o /boot/loader.conf.
ZFS filesystem version 4
ZFS storage pool version 15
WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted
WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted
WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted
--
Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/
___
free
On 9/29/2010 3:57 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning I
can do.
The system is now running:
# zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | zfs receive storage/compress
On Wed, September 29, 2010 3:57 pm, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>> It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning I
>> can do.
>>
>> The system is now running:
>>
>
On Fri, October 1, 2010 11:45 am, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On Wed, September 29, 2010 3:57 pm, Artem Belevich wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning
>>
On Wed, September 29, 2010 2:04 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
> $ zpool iostat 10
>capacity operationsbandwidth
> pool used avail read write read write
> -- - - - - - -
> storage 7.67T 5.02T358 3
FYI: this is all on the same box.
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> Hmm. It did help me a lot when I was replicating ~2TB worth of data
> over GigE. Without mbuffer things were roughly in the ballpark of your
> numbers. Wit
On 10/1/2010 7:00 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
FYI: this is all on the same box.
In one of the previous emails you've used this command line:
# mbuffer -s 128k -m 1G -I 9090 | zfs receive
You've used mbuffer in network clie
and then in the
zpool. However, I'm reluctant to do a 'camcontrol scan' on this box as
it it froze up the system the last time I tried that:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C78FF01.5020500
Any suggestions for getting the drive back online and the zpool stabilized?
On 10/2/2010 10:19 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:43:30AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
Overnight I was running a zfs send | zfs receive (both within the
same system / zpool). The system ran out of space, a drive went off
line, and the system is degraded.
This is a raidz2
On 10/2/2010 6:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:09:25PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10/2/2010 10:19 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:43:30AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
Overnight I was running a zfs send | zfs receive (both within the
same system
On 10/2/2010 7:50 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10/2/2010 6:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:09:25PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10/2/2010 10:19 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 09:43
On 10/2/2010 10:04 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
After a 'shutdown -p now', it was about 20 minutes before I went and
powered it up (I was on minecraft). The box came back with the missing HDD:
$ zpool status storage
pool: storage
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has expe
On 10/1/2010 9:32 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 10/1/2010 7:00 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
FYI: this is all on the same box.
In one of the previous emails you've used this command line:
# mbuffer -s 128k -m 1G -I 9090 | zfs receive
Y
178 105M 11.8M
storage 8.08T 4.60T 1.06K198 131M 12.0M
storage 8.08T 4.60T 1.06K185 131M 12.4M
Yeterday's write bandwidth was more 80-90M. It's down, a lot.
I'll look closer this evening.
>
> mm
>
> DÅa 4. 10. 2010 4:06, Artem Belevich
On 10/4/2010 7:19 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Dan Langille (from Sun, 03 Oct 2010 08:08:19
-0400):
Overnight, the following appeared in /var/log/messages:
Oct 2 21:56:46 kraken root: ZFS: checksum mismatch, zpool=storage
path=/dev/gpt/disk06-live offset=123103157760 size=1024
Oct
On 10/4/2010 2:10 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 01:31:07PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On Mon, October 4, 2010 3:27 am, Martin Matuska wrote:
Try using zfs receive with the -v flag (gives you some stats at the end):
# zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | zfs receive -v
On 10/4/2010 7:19 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Dan Langille (from Sun, 03 Oct 2010 08:08:19
-0400):
Overnight, the following appeared in /var/log/messages:
Oct 2 21:56:46 kraken root: ZFS: checksum mismatch, zpool=storage
path=/dev/gpt/disk06-live offset=123103157760 size=1024
Oct
fied
since most recent snapshot
warning: cannot send 'storage/bac...@2010.10.20': Broken pipe
I have no idea why this fails. Clues please?
To my knowledge, the destination has not been written to.
--
Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/
__
On Wed, October 20, 2010 8:44 am, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:32:33AM -0400, Dan Langille typed:
>> I am trying to do a 'zfs send -i' and failing.
>>
>> This is my simple proof of concept test:
>>
>> Create the data
>&g
pool without a panic. But once I
online the log device and do any writes, I get the panic again.
As I mentioned, I have this data replicated elsewere, so I can exper-
iment with the pool if it will help track down this issue.
Any more news on this?
--
Dan Langille - http
he machine check registers once an hour. If this happens
constantly you might have a DIMM that is dying?
John:
I take it these ECC errors *may* have been happening for some time.
What has changed is the OS now polls for the errors and reports them.
--
Dan Langille - http://la
sboot -i 1 ad0
Cheers,
Matthew
This part applies only if you're booting from ZFS drives?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
On 12/30/2010 4:00 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 30/12/2010 00:56, Dan Langille wrote:
them. You'll need to run both 'zpool update -a' and 'zfs update -a' --
As Jean-Yves pointed out: upgrade not update. Some word beginning with
'up' anyhow.
# gp
o be done by hand. I don't know many administrators who
are going to tolerate this when deploying numerous machines, especially
when compounded by the complexities mentioned above.
This basically outlines the reason why I do not use ZFS on root.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.or
o use as spares. Whether
they sit on the shelf or in the box is open to discussion.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any ma
How reliable is make delete-old and make delete-old-libs on 7.1-PRERELEASE?
I ask because I just upgraded a remote system from 6.3-stable to
7.1-PRERELEASE. All seems well so far. Apps are running fine. I just
figure I should do this final bit.
FYI, I've written up how I did this migration
John Scroggins wrote:
Hello all,
I have attempted to upgrade to 7.1-Pre with no avail.
My source tree is has been cleaned and /usr/obj is cleared every time
the system is rebuilt. I have swapped over the kernel config to the
latest Generic and uncommented the dtrace hooks -- but my build
conti
Folks:
I have upgraded a server from 6.3 to 7.0. That went rather smoothly. I
have a question about removing old libraries via make delete-old.
Given the list of old libraries shown at the end of this URL:
http://www.freebsddiary.org/upgrade-6.3-to-7.0.php
Is that list more or less expec
I'm wondering if these commands from /usr/src/Makefile are correctly
described:
# check-old - List obsolete directories/files/libraries.
# check-old-dirs - List obsolete directories.
# check-old-files - List obsolete files.
# check-old-libs - List obsolete libraries.
# d
Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
Hi,
* Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081004 00:18]:
Folks:
I have upgraded a server from 6.3 to 7.0. That went rather smoothly. I
have a question about removing old libraries via make delete-old.
Given the list of old libraries shown at the end of th
Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 10/5/08, Wolfgang Zenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that list more or less expected? From what I can tell, it's pretty
> safe to now do a make delete-old-libs. Do you concur?
that depends on you having updated all ports/packages as well as the
base system. I thi
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt source
on FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #6: Sat Jan 10 21:45:05 EST 2009
FWIW, I got the same thing on 7.0-stable from back in May (IIRC).
Of note, atapci0 and fxp0 are both on irq 22.
Ideas? suggestions?
Copyrig
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt source
Interesting how they sometimes span lines:
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: interrup
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: t storm detected on "irq22:"; thr
Ja
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling interrupt
source
Interesting how they sometimes span lines:
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: interrup
Jan 14 21:16:24 polo kernel: t
for
me. I have 4 GBytes of memory and I'm planning to install another 4
GBytes asap.
FWIW, I also have 4GB RAM. This box is destined to be a jail server for
running regression testing of various projects (e.g Bacula).
--
Dan Langille
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference :
rd you can drop
in thn you could try that...
FYI, this box has always run off an ethernet card (fxp). The on-board
NIC (re) was enabled. After disabling, the ethernet storms persisted.
--
Dan Langille
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The PostgreSQL
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Pete French wrote:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling
interrupt source
Opening the case, reading the m/b:
K9A2 Platinum MSI
I hadnt been paying much attention to this thread, but just to let you
know t
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2009-Jan-14 22:57:46 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
Opening the case, reading the m/b:
K9A2 Platinum MSI
Tangentially related: For any decent M/B, kenv(8) should tell you
this without needing to open the box.
woo!
$ kenv
LINES="24"
acpi_load="YES&qu
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this:
kernel: interrupt storm detected on "irq22:"; throttling
interrupt source
what is y
ader.conf.
If that solution works, it'd got to leave a 'bad' taste in your mouth. ;)
--
Dan Langille
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/
___
freebsd-s
egression test suite (lots of IO). For my
machine, once the interrupt storm starts, it continues. I do not know
if that happens to everyone.
Since changing the address, I have had no interrupt storms. I have been
running the above IO loop for about ten minutes.
No storm yet (knock on wood).
--
On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:22:06PM +0300, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
trouble with onboard re(4) was resolved in -CURRENT and -STABLE,
but storms are not bound to ethernet only. storm may appear on
any device. if any
major problems updating this board from MSI with
a XP-64 bit CPU , I tryed all last week and no go, or am I the only
one?
Thanks in advance SEanS.
.
2009/1/20 Dan Langille
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Marat N.Afanasyev
On Jan 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:22:06PM +0300, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
trouble with onboard re(4) was resolved in -CURRENT and -
STABLE, but
On Jan 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On Jan 22, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
Victor Balada Diaz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:22:06PM +0300, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
trouble with onboard re(4) was resolved in -CURRENT and -
STABLE, but
hald
uptime was about 1:50 at this point.
Seems to be relatively common from the posts I've seen.
ThinkPad X61s. dmesg output attached. FWIW.
- --
Dan Langille
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
