Hi,
One of my servers running 7.2-RELEASE-p2 is crashing about every 2 or 3
days with the following backtrace. This particular one is from July
24.I still have all the vmcores available if any further info is required.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
f
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:33:16AM -0400, Dan wrote:
Hi,
One of my servers running 7.2-RELEASE-p2 is crashing about every 2 or 3
days with the following backtrace. This particular one is from July
24.I still have all the vmcores available if any further info is
On Monday 16 October 2006 18:15, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> In STABLE and upcoming 6.2 (and in CURRENT, of course) there is a new
> SMB driver for NForce2/3/4 chipsets, nfsmb, developed by Ruslan
> Ermilov. However, the driver doesn't currently work on all hardware
> that it is to support. The problem i
Your message could not be delivered. The User is out of space. Please try to
send your message again at a later time.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
n my system included the line:
maximum XvImage size: 1024 x 0
...which was evidently not a useful size. Under 4.1.0 it reports
maximum XvImage size: 2048 x 2048
HTH,
Dan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
tings, etc, I'm
happy to run them and include the results. We have lots of time to play
with this.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
On 1/8/2011 4:33 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Dan Langille mailto:d...@langille.org>> wrote:
I've been running a ZFS array for about 10 months on a system with
4GB of RAM. I'm about to add another 4GB of RAM.
I think this might
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull in a
hot spare if one is required.
This raised the issue back in March 2010, and refers to a PR opened in
May 2009
*
On 1/11/2011 11:10 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 11/01/2011 03:38, Dan Langille wrote:
On 1/4/2011 11:52 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
On 04/01/2011 03:08, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm trying to discover if ZFS under FreeBSD will automatically pull
in a
hot spare if one is req
there is preliminary code under #ifdef LAGG_PORT_STACKING, but
it claims to be untested.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
61588MB (732566646 4096 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 364801C)
>
> According to Hitachi, this is an 512b drive.
Correct. This isn't a 4k drive. Datasheet:
http://www.hgst.com/internal-drives/enterprise/ultrastar/ultrastar-7k3000
Sector size (variable, Bytes/sector)5
right in thinking I
could also use this by first upgrading my host and then running this command
to write the /basejail over with the updated files from the host to bring
them into sync? I still don't know how I would then fix the /etc under each
individual jail though.
ersubscribed (common for older
blade switches, or very high-density blades); sometimes there will be
rectangles enclosing groups of 6-8 ports, which means that they are
controlled by a single chip internally. Moving each of your test machines
to a separate group may improve your performan
In the last episode (Apr 12), Dan Nelson said:
> In the last episode (Apr 12), Denny Schierz said:
> > Am Montag, den 11.04.2011, 21:52 +0200 schrieb Denny Schierz:
> > > Am 11.04.2011 um 20:06 schrieb Tim Daneliuk:
> > > > Are you certain you are not somehow run
s/^.*: //p')
echo "$stat"
svn info | grep Revision
svn update
if [ "$localrev" != "$latestrev" ] ; then
echo "Log:"
echo "svn log -v -r $(($localrev+1)):$latestrev $repo"
fi
Sample output:
(root@dan) /usr/src # ./update
M 220902
rland. If you run "tcpdump arp", you should be able to see the packet
timestamps as the kernel sees them.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
ely weird. Could you have run a partitioning tool, or some other
program that would have done direct writes to all of your component disks?
Your scrub is also a bit worrying - 24k checksum errors definitely shouldn't
occur during normal usage.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allan
grep nfsd
1373 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd)
1374 ?? S 1:25.79 nfsd: server (nfsd)
1374 ?? S 1:26.65 nfsd: server (nfsd)
1374 ?? S 1:27.67 nfsd: server (nfsd)
1374 ?? S 1:27.04 nfsd: server (nfsd)
--
Da
SyncID: 1
ID: 3585934016
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:50:01PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> System in question: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #3: Thu Mar 3 04:52:04 GMT 2011
>>
>> After a recent power failure, I'm seeing this in my logs:
>>
>
On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:39:17PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:50:01PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>> Syst
245828 secs (2822954 bytes/sec)
real13m0.256s
user0m22.087s
sys 3m24.215s
> Also i am highly recommending to setup smartd as daemon and to monitor number
> of relocated sectors. If they will grow again - then it is a good time to
> utilize
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:34:41PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Aug 19, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 09:39:17PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> ...
>>>>
On Aug 20, 2011, at 2:36 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Dan, I will respond to your reply sometime tomorrow. I do not have time
> to review the Email today (~7.7KBytes), but will have time tomorrow.
No worries. Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - http://langil
if both drives in your mirror were bought at the same time
> from the same place and have similar manufacturing plants/dates on
> them).
I'm happy to send you this drive for your experimentation pleasure.
If so, please email me an address offline. You don't have a disk with
((lwpinfo.pl_flags&(PL_FLAG_SCE|PL_FLAG_SCX)) == 0)
+ err(1,"pl_flags=%x contains neither PL_FLAG_SCE
or PL_FLAG_SCX", lwpinfo.pl_flags);
+ info->pr_why = (lwpinfo.pl_flags&PL_FLAG_SCE) ?
S_SCE:S_SCX;
+ info->curth
hat value changes while the function is executing, it could
cause problems. ui_sbsize is only used by the resource limiting code,
though, so unless you're enforcing an sbsize rlimit, it should be harmless.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
t in the dark here, but the only thing I can think of that might
> cause this is software being extremely aggressive with calls to things
> like gettimeofday(2) or clock_gettime(2). Really not sure. ntpd maybe
> (unlikely but possible)? Sort of grasping at straws here.
--
Dan N
if I disable that
(hw.acpi.disable=pci) then the machine cannot find a boot drive.
So I have lost functionality that worked fine in BSD 8.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
Thanks,
Dan Allen
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
m 2004 machines.
In other words, there is no tree for me.
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
s until it breaks.
Fair enough. I will see what I can accomplish. Thanks!
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ne for your help. Happy New Years!
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 31 Dec 2011, at 4:31 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> In the meantime: Dan, when you say in your original mail, "I just
> upgraded my Dell OptiPlex GX270 from RELENG_8 to RELENG_9", can you
> please provide uname -a output from the system when it was running
> RELENG_8? I&
py with the result. I've
never done it completely remotely, but if you do a trial run or two on a
local machine or VM, you should be able to it confidently remotely.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-stable@free
Pretty sure I have a brand new, never used floppy drive laying around
that I could send to you :) I don't think I have any discs though.
On 03/27/2012 17:03, Mark Felder wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:48:26 -0500, Thomas Laus wrote:
It looks like we both have confirmed that the floppy dis
I haven't had a chance to read through this entire thread yet, but
wanted to post this in case it helps someone.
ntpd was working fine for me for a while, and then I started getting
this exact same error. After a few weeks, I finally started
troubleshooting and it turned out that I had, at
I haven't had a chance to read through this entire thread yet, but
wanted to post this in case it helps someone.
ntpd was working fine for me for a while, and then I started getting
this exact same error. After a few weeks, I finally started
troubleshooting and it turned out that I had, at
I didn't see a link to this information in the e-mail below. I found this info
detailed here:
https://signup.netflix.com/openconnect/software
From: Benjamin Francom
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tue, June 5, 2012 11:00:01 AM
Subject: Netflix's New
Maybe their knowledge of Linux drove them to use FreeBSD. Sorry,
couldn't resist ;)
On 06/05/2012 19:42, David Magda wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012, at 20:16, Scott Long wrote:
If you have any questions, let me know or follow the information links on the
OpenConnect web site.
Out of curiosity, giv
I usually use portmaster to install ports. The options dialogs that pop
up are often for dependencies. The options dialog gives the name of the
port for which the options are being selected, but no description or
indication as to why this is being installed (this could be a dependency
of a de
Thanks. I'll check this script out.
From: Oliver Fromme
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Dan Daley ; Charles
Sprickman
; Warren Block ; Vincent Hoffman
Sent: Fri, June 8, 2012 2:47:37 AM
Subject: Re: Documenting 'make config' options
D
can have monthly/daily/hourly snapshots but set it so the
hourly ones disappear first, then the dailies (by setting the destroy
trigger slightly higher for the ones you want to expire first).
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
__
hange this behavior yet.
If there are multiple users that map to the same userid, nscd on Linux will
select one name at random and return it for getpwuid() calls. I haven't
seen this behaviour on FreeBSD or Solaris, though. They always seem to
return the first entry in the passwd file.
This is more for the record than asking a specific question.
Today I upgraded a system to FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE. Then I started
seeing these messages when I ssh to said box with an ssh-agent enabled
connection:
Jul 11 03:43:06 ngaio sshd[30290]: Authentication tried for dan with
correct
ad14ONLINE 0 0 0
ad16ONLINE 0 0 0
Of course, always have good backups. ;)
In my case, this ZFS array is the backup. ;)
But I'm setting up a tape library, real soon now
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
On 7/21/2010 2:54 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, alan bryan wrote:
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Dan Langille wrote:
From: Dan Langille
Subject: Re: Problems replacing failing drive in ZFS pool
To: "Freddie Cash"
Cc
On 7/19/2010 10:50 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I think it's because you pull the old drive, boot with the new drive,
the controller re-numbers all the devices (ie da3 is now da2, da2 is
now da1, da1 is now da0, da0 is now da6, etc), an
antage to using the -l option
on 'gpart add' instead of the glabel above?
Thanks
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 7/21/2010 11:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote (something close to this):
First, create a new GUID Partition Table partition scheme on the HDD:
gpart create -s GPT ad0
Let's see how much space we have. This output will be used to determine
SOMEVALUE in the next command.
gpart show
Create
device 17.0 on pci0
Which is the onboard SATA from what I can tell, not the controllers I
installed to handle the ZFS array. The onboard SATA runs a gmirror
array which handles /, /tmp, /usr, and /var (i.e. the OS). ZFS runs
only on on my /storage mount point.
--
Dan
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0: port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfbeffc00-0xfbeffc7f,0xfbef-0xfbef7fff irq 17 at device 4.0 on pci7
atapci1: port 0xac00-
On 7/22/2010 3:08 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:02:33AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0: port 0xdc00-
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure of the criteria, but this is what I'm running:
atapci0: port 0xdc00-0xdc0f mem
0xfbeffc00-
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure o
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure o
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm not sure o
.
I wonder if my friend Jerry has a spare 2TB HDD I could borrow for the
evening.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any ma
agically.
So... the smaller size won't mess things up...
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
t
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On 7/22/2010 8:47 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Thank you to all the helpful discussion. It's been very helpful and
educational. Based on the advice and suggestions, I'm going to adjust my
original plan as follows.
NOTE: glabel will not be used.
First, create a new GUID Partition Table
ems I have a 5-HDD zpool and it's going to stay that way.
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 7/23/2010 10:25 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Pawell and I had an online chat about part of my strategy. To be clear:
I have a 5x2TB raidz1 array.
I have 2x2TB empty HDD
My goal was to go to raidz2 by:
- copy data to empty HDD
- redo the
G
0+0 records in
0+0 records out
0 bytes transferred in 0.25 secs (0 bytes/sec)
$ ls -l /tmp/sparsefile1.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 2147483648000 Jul 23 22:49 /tmp/sparsefile1.img
$ ls -lh /tmp/sparsefile1.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 2.0T Jul 23 22:49 /tmp/sparsefile1.img
--
Dan Langille -
On 7/23/2010 10:51 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/23/2010 10:42 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 24/07/2010, at 11:55, Freddie Cash wrote:
It's theoretical as I have not investigated how to create sparse
files on FreeBSD, nor have I done this. It's based on several
posts to the zfs-
ke them trivial; note
that temporary disks 3 and 4 don't have to be 2TB, 1.5TB will do.
The lack of redundancy is noted and accepted. Thanks. :)
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists
On 7/22/2010 4:11 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 4:03 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 3:30 AM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
On 7/22/2010 2:59 AM, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 22.07.2010 10:32, Dan
On 7/23/2010 7:42 AM, John Hawkes-Reed wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
Thank you to all the helpful discussion. It's been very helpful and
educational. Based on the advice and suggestions, I'm going to adjust
my original plan as follows.
[ ... ]
Since I still have the medium-sized ZF
this:
gpart add -b 1024 -s 3906824301 -t freebsd-zfs -l disk01 ada1
or
gpart add -b 34 -s 3906824301 -t freebsd-zfs -l disk01 ada1
Repeat for all 5 HDD. And then:
zpool create storage raidz2 gpt/disk01 gpt/disk02 gpt/disk03 gpt/disk04
gpt/disk05
Two Bonnie-64 tests:
First, with -b 34:
# ~dan/b
On 7/24/2010 10:44 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'll run -s 2 and -s 5 tests overnight and will post them in the
morning.
The -s 2 results are in:
-b 34:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per
On 7/24/2010 10:44 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
You may have seen my cunning plan:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=883310+0+current/freebsd-stable
I've been doing some testing today. The first of my tests comparing
partitions aligned on a 4KB boundary are in. I created a 5x2TB
corrupted
data
errors: No known data errors
Another attempt to destroy the array created a panic.
Suggestions as to how to remove this array and get started again?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
h
On 7/25/2010 1:58 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains
nothing of value.
Oh... I left this out:
FreeBSD kraken.unixathome.org 8.0-STABLE FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #0: Fri Mar
5 00:46:11 EST 2010
d...@kraken.example.org:/usr/obj/us
e found or current contents doesn't look like ZFS device.
Can you try moving current files to /tmp/sparsefile[34].img and then
readd them to the pool with zpool replace? One by one please.
I do not know what the above paragraph means.
--
Dan Langille - http
On 7/25/2010 4:49 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
25.07.2010 20:58, Dan Langille wrote:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
storage ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk01 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk02 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk03 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk04 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk05 ONLINE 0 0 0
/tmp/sparsefile1.img
On 7/25/2010 1:58 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains
nothing of value.
# zpool status
pool: storage
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is
missing or
invalid. Sufficient replicas exis
22d09712b
label: disk05-live
length: 2000188135936
offset: 1048576
type: freebsd-zfs
index: 1
end: 3906619500
start: 2048
Consumers:
1. Name: ada5
Mediasize: 2000398934016 (1.8T)
Sectorsize: 512
Mode: r1w1e3
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
On 8/2/2010 7:11 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
I recently altered an existing raidz2 pool from using 7 vdevs of about
931G to 1.81TB. In fact, the existing pool used half of each HDD. I then
wanted to go to using [almost] all of each HDD.
I offline'd each vdev, adjusted the HDD paritions using
> root20986 0.0 0.1 14636 1572 ?? D 2:00PM 0:02.07 zfs snapshot
> -r po...@2010-08-21_14:00:01--1d
procstat -k on some of these processes might help to pinpoint what part of
the zfs code they're all waiting in.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.co
-STABLE #1: Sun Aug 22 23:16:43
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory
k
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
k
On 8/23/2010 7:47 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 24/08/2010 02:43 Dan Langille said the following:
On 8/22/2010 10:05 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel: MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0xf5a, APIC ID 0
kernel: MCA: CPU 0 COR BUSLG Source RD Memory
k
On 8/24/2010 7:38 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:13:23PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 8/22/2010 9:18 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
What does this mean?
kernel: MCA: Bank 4, Status 0x940c4001fe080813
kernel: MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x
kernel
? What is
your view on replacing DRAM? What do you conclude from the summary?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
This this something to be concerned about:
ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or length:
0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655)
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 8/28/2010 8:30 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 04:35:58PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
This this something to be concerned about:
ACPI Warning: Optional field Pm2ControlBlock has zero address or
length: 0x/0x1 (20100331/tbfadt-655)
CC'ing freebsd-acpi
In the last episode (Aug 31), Tim Bishop said:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 05:24:29PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Aug 21), Tim Bishop said:
> > > A few items from top, including zfskern:
> > >
> > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE
In the last episode (Sep 01), Tim Bishop said:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:58:29AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Aug 31), Tim Bishop said:
> > > It happened again this Saturday (clearly something in the weekly
> > > periodic run is triggering the
ZFS BTW, it's great!
Dan
On Sep 16, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Dont forget to read the general "ZFS notes" section in UPDATING:
>
> ZFS notes
> -
> When upgrading the boot ZFS pool to a new version, always follow
> these two steps:
>
&g
ork on ZFS BTW, it's great!
Dan
On Sep 16, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Henri Hennebert wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 17:18, jhell wrote:
>> On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
>>> caveats t
ode
(zfs) ~/zfs # gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad7
ad7 has bootcode
(zfs) ~/zfs # gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptzfsboot -i 1 ad8
ad8 has bootcode
(zfs) ~/zfs # reboot
Dan
On Sep 19, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 19/09/2010 17:36:01, Dan Mack
o /boot/loader.conf.
ZFS filesystem version 4
ZFS storage pool version 15
WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted
WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted
WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted
--
Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/
___
free
On 9/29/2010 3:57 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning I
can do.
The system is now running:
# zfs send storage/bac...@transfer | zfs receive storage/compress
On Wed, September 29, 2010 3:57 pm, Artem Belevich wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>> It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning I
>> can do.
>>
>> The system is now running:
>>
>
On Fri, October 1, 2010 11:45 am, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On Wed, September 29, 2010 3:57 pm, Artem Belevich wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> It's taken about 15 hours to copy 800GB. I'm sure there's some tuning
>>
On Wed, September 29, 2010 2:04 pm, Dan Langille wrote:
> $ zpool iostat 10
>capacity operationsbandwidth
> pool used avail read write read write
> -- - - - - - -
> storage 7.67T 5.02T358 3
FYI: this is all on the same box.
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
On Oct 1, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
> Hmm. It did help me a lot when I was replicating ~2TB worth of data
> over GigE. Without mbuffer things were roughly in the ballpark of your
> numbers. Wit
On 10/1/2010 7:00 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
FYI: this is all on the same box.
In one of the previous emails you've used this command line:
# mbuffer -s 128k -m 1G -I 9090 | zfs receive
You've used mbuffer in network clie
and then in the
zpool. However, I'm reluctant to do a 'camcontrol scan' on this box as
it it froze up the system the last time I tried that:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C78FF01.5020500
Any suggestions for getting the drive back online and the zpool stabilized?
1 - 100 of 683 matches
Mail list logo
