If memory serves me right, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> I dont recall seeing this on RELENG_7, but I dont have a box to test with
> anymore confirm. On one box I upgraded to RELENG_8 I just noticed the nic
> will bounce if I enable tcpdump on it. Sure enough, trying on a different
> RELENG_8 box with a
If memory serves me right, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:45:08AM +0200, Svein Skogen wrote:
>
>> In 25 words or less, what are the major changes in 7.0->7.1 and 6.3->6.4
>> for us end users?
>
> In more words, but pretty interesting:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/rel
If memory serves me right, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
In
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.3R/relnotes-i386.html
ipfwpcap(8) is mentioned, but I can't find it after the upgrade ?
Argh. My bad. It got merged to RELENG_6 *just* after RELENG_6_3 was
branched, by about a day or so. Somehow I must ha
If memory serves me right, John Baldwin wrote:
Given how simple the patch is and that if fixes a known panic this might be
worthy of an errata notice or errata candidate. (At least a note in the
errata pointing to the 1.85.2.10 commit if not an actual patch to
RELENG_6_3.)
I added an item t
If memory serves me right, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> By the way, I believe that some stats do go up and down, but not
> counters. Like in snmp, counters are never supposed to be reset or
> resettable.
Examples of values that go up and down (actually the only examples I can
think of) are the drive te
If memory serves me right, Paul Mather wrote:
> That's weird. I have the same basic /boot/loader.conf entries
> (except for a speed of 115200) and even just putting "-Dh" into
> /boot.config leads to the same unbootable system behaviour. :-(
>
> Maybe something broke recently in the RELENG_8 boot
If memory serves me right, Pete French wrote:
> since we are talking about IPv6, how do people genarlly find it on FreeBSD?
Two quasi-data points:
1. I personally have been doing dual-stack on my FreeBSD machines for a
couple years, with a gif(4) tunnel to my ISP (my tunnel endpoint runs
6-STABL
If memory serves me right, Karl Triebes wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2007 4:59 AM, Ken Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay with this phase of the 6.3 release. A few glitches
>> were found during testing of the 6.3-RC2 ISOs that included pre-built
>> packages.
>>
>> The 6.3-RC2 builds fo
If memory serves me right, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Andreas Ott wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not sure if the stable list is the correct place to report this,
>> but currently binary updates are not working. I see posts on the forum
>> but no solutions are being offered
If memory serves me right, Cassiano Peixoto wrote:
> Looks we have some import issues to be fixed before 11-RELEASE. I have
> another one that nobody cares:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213257
> and
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212413
>
> It's affec
If memory serves me right, Philippe Pegon wrote:
> In June 2006, I opened a PR (kern/98622) about a regression on CARP
> with IPv6 addresses: CARP is not usable with IPv6. Since I tracked
> down the culprit commit (see appropriate info in the PR), I can
> affirm that this regression appeared befor
If memory serves me right, Randy Bush wrote:
> releng6 as of yesterday
>
> # tzsetup
> tzsetup: /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab:250: country code `ME' unknown
I think this was fixed in rev. 1.13.8.2 of src/share/misc/iso3166.
Bruce.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
If memory serves me right, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Looking at the http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/todo.html today, I was
> surprised to not see the following problems in addition to the em(4) issue:
[snip]
Just because a particular issue isn't mentioned on this page doesn't
mean that RE i
If memory serves me right, ke han wrote:
> According to the 6.2-beta3 announcemetn, there are improvements to
> the em driver.
>
> "The most important of the things that have been worked on is the
> driver for em(4). "
>
> I have a Sun X4100 which uses Intel ethernet. I would like to
> insta
If memory serves me right, Brian Wolman wrote:
> Just wanted to find out if there are any issues when jumping from the
> 4.11 to the 5.3. Like way out of the ordinary type problems, this jump
> for me is going to be very difficult as it is and I want to make sure I
> don't get a surprise...
Rea
If memory serves me right, Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
> Will there be a RC2 or just a realease?
Current plans are to do one more release candidate (== 6.2-RC2) and then
the final release. If I said it was coming soon, nobody would believe
me, so I won't say it. :-p
Bruce.
signature.asc
Descrip
If memory serves me right, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 December 2006 01:49 pm, Martin Blapp wrote:
Build 6.2-RC2 24 December 2006Begin building the second
release candidate
build for all Tier-1 platforms.
>> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/schedule.html
>
> No
I wrote:
> That list isn't quite current either; at least two of the machines
> listed as running 4.X are really running 6.X due to recent hardware
> swapouts and upgrades. I'll go update the Web page to reflect this.
...except that someone just beat me to it. :-)
Bruce.
signature.asc
Desc
If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 08:45:03AM +0800, lveax wrote..
>> seems there are many machines at freebsd.org network are still using
>> 4-STABLE now.
>
> There is a mix of versions in use, upgrading is done at the discretion
> of the admins team that cont
If memory serves me right, LI Xin wrote:
> Ken Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 16:01 +0100, Thomas Herrlin wrote:
>>> It still runs networking daemons into a frozen zoneli state on
>>> heavy/(D)DOS network loads. Such processes cant be kill-9ed so there is
>>> no way to recover from it. (thin
If memory serves me right, LI Xin wrote:
> Not sure if the snapshot contained the changes, though... IIRC the
> January snapshot is not released yet?
The January CURRENT snapshots are being built and uploaded now. The
mirrors might have some of the architectures, but an announcement will
come o
If memory serves me right, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Scott T. Hildreth wrote:
>>> Does anyone know if the Release is still going to happen today?
>> The release is not going to happen today, but will be very soon. My
>> guess is that builds and mi
If memory serves me right, Angelo Turetta wrote:
> Am I dreaming, or hasn't the practice always been to rename the RELENG_6
> kernel back to 6-STABLE (or whatever) just after the RELENG_6_x branch?
>
> Right now it's still labelled 6.2-PRERELEASE.
I think we've typically done this in the past bu
If memory serves me right, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 08:02:11AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> The desktop network configuration is:
>> tl0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
>> ether 00:00:24:28:98:9a
>> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
>> status: active
>> r
If memory serves me right, Jayel Villamin wrote:
> tag used is RELENG_6.
>
> cvsup was completed at around 3am Monday New York time. 6.2 has been
> released hours before so I thought uname -a should display something
> else? like "6-stable" or at least something other than
> "6.2-prerelease"?
Mak
If memory serves me right, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> I'd like to know, are documentation iso files for amd64 and i386 arch
> exactly the same? MD5 is different. I have the one for i386. Should I
> get also for amd64 and use it for 64 bit box? In other words, are they
> arch specific?
The content is arc
I'm observing a problem with IPv6 over gif(4) tunnels on 6.2-RELEASE
and recent 6-STABLE, namely that I can't seem to be able to pass
traffic over them.
Essentially, when I configure a gif interface like this:
# ifconfig gif0 inet6 :::::1 :::::2 prefixlen
128
the
If memory serves me right, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> "Bruce A. Mah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> bm> I'm observing a problem with IPv6 over gif(4) tunnels on 6.2-RELEASE
> bm> and recent 6-STABLE, namely that I can't se
If memory serves me right, Max Laier wrote:
> On Sunday 21 January 2007 02:17, Pete French wrote:
>> I have a network with a 6.2-RELEASE machine as a gateway to
>> the outside world, and on the inside three machines hung off it,
>> running OSX, XPx64 and 6.2-RELEASE as well. The gateway machine
>>
If memory serves me right, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
>>> I remember Dimitry Andric reported the same problem on -stable on 30
>>> Dec, and after he reverted rev.1.48.2.16 it worked fine again. Do
>>> you have the symptom even on 6.2-RELEAS
If memory serves me right, Pete French wrote:
>> 2) rtsol(8) is used to initiate stateless autoconfiguration. You might=20
>> want to try "rtsol -d interface".
>
> Aha... this does not work...
>
>> 3) Check the net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv sysctl. ipv6_enable should take=20
>> care of this.
>
>
If memory serves me right, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
>>> and later I found out it was caused by commit 1.48.2.16:
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-December/031853.html
>> This isn't consistent with what I'm finding.
If memory serves me right, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> I mean that it may be that between -RELEASE and -STABLE, other things
> have changed, e.g. network rc scripts, /sbin/route itself, etc, which
> may also influence this behaviour. I'm sure more than onl
If memory serves me right, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
>>> Confirmed. I've updated the machine on which I originally had this
>>> problem to -STABLE as of today, and the problem has disappeared.
>> I thought it was also planned to be incorporated to RELENG_6_2, right?
>
>
If memory serves me right, Artem Kuchin wrote:
>
>> Has anyone succeeded in doing a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade from source without
>> upgrading first to 5.x as an intermediate step?
>
>
>
> tried twice - did not work, but going to 5 and then to 6 was not a problem.
> But i suspect than going from older
If memory serves me right, Pete French wrote:
> I appear to have a machine which will not run RELENG_6_2, though it runs
> the released code quite happily. Is there a CVS tag I can use to revert the
> sources back to the way they were on RELEASE? I want to be able to
> verify that this is and track
If memory serves me right, Gregory Shapiro wrote:
> The libmilter ABI breakage which required recompiling mail filters
> (milters) has been fixed in the RELENG_[456] branches.
>
> It is no longer necessary to recompile mail filters compiled against an
> older libmilter.so shared library. Addition
If memory serves me right, LI Xin wrote:
> Hi, Erik,
>
> Erik Trulsson wrote:
>> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Volker wrote:
> [...]
>>> I know there's a release cycle for 7-CURRENT planned next June but
>>> IMHO it can be delayed for some weeks.
>>>
>>> What does the core and releng t
If memory serves me right, Colin Percival wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
>> We've done point releases in the past but only in cases where there were
>> severe problems and/or regressions with released versions. Look at the
>> announcements and release notes for 4.6.2-RE
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 May 2006, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
>
>> i see, thanks. there is some XML(or similar) file. should i have to
>> build the whole world to get a human-readable form, or is there some
>> other, less painful way for it?
>
> The release notes are built automatically as
In case anyone missed this: RELENG_5_5 is now in the very capable hands
of the security officer and his team.
Bruce.
--- Begin Message ---
scottl 2006-05-31 06:45:44 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.approvers
Log:
Give ownership of the RELENG_5_5
If memory serves me right, Peter Losher wrote:
> I have been mucking about w/ 'make release' for some time now (stripping
> out OpenSSH, sendmail, Heimdal, bits oF BIND, etc.) and while I now have
> a working .iso image, that will install and update, I have some
> questions that 'man release' just
If memory serves me right, Janet Sullivan wrote:
> I do think some mistakes were made with the release engineering over
> 5.x's lifetime, but folks, what's done is done. Recently things do seem
> to be headed in a better direction, for which I'm thankful.
As one who "was there" for about half
If memory serves me right, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Björn König <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Randy Bush wrote:
> > > any peculiarities/clues for upgrading an antique from 4.11 to
> > > RELENG_6 beyond the "To upgrade in-place from 5.x-stable to
> > > current" in UPDATING?
> >
> > I guess no
If memory serves me right, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> Directly jumping from 4 to 6 might work similar to the 4 to 5 procedure
> but I've never tried this.
No. Source-upgrading to 6.X can only be done from 5.3-RELEASE (or newer
RELENG_5). So somebody trying to do a source upgrade from 4.X need
If memory serves me right, "David O'Brien" wrote:
> I'm about to MFC this. Again, please run as many old apps as you can to
> see if this causes any problems.
This seems to have borken /usr/ports/security/gnupg-rsa:
bmah-freebsd-0:bmah% pkg_version.pl -v | grep gnupg
gnupg-1.0.4
If memory serves me right, "Passki, Jonathan P" wrote:
> When does the release information on the website usually get updated
> (http://www.freebsd.org/releases/index.html)? I've been slightly following
> the list, but I was just looking for a summary of changes and enhancements
> from 4.1.1 to
I'm going to try to move this to -mobile where it belongs...
If memory serves me right, Nate Williams wrote:
> > As I read it, some people have had success and others haven't. It's
> > difficult to figure out what the problem is, since there are so many
> > variables involved and the messages
If memory serves me right, Kent Stewart wrote:
> whisky wrote:
> >
> > How does one use mergemaster correctly after a make installworld of 4.2-R t
> o
> > 4.x-S
>
> Very, very carefully.
That applies to pretty much any system administration task.
> It will try to change all of the configurati
If memory serves me right, "whisky" wrote:
> Is it recommended to cvsup from 4.2-RELEASE to 4.x-STABLE
>
> Any exploits/bugs that might persuade me to defaintely do it..?
The release notes will tell you what's changed since the last release
along a branch, to within about a week. After you
[moved to -ports]
If memory serves me right, Mike Harding wrote:
>
> Well, just to defend myself...
>
> I find that pkg_version -c is a useful tool for helping me do
> upgrades. I do put the result in a file and do the appropriate thing.
^^^
If memory serves me right, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Martti Kuparinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [...]
> > The only solution for my problem might be to reinstall the port so that
> > this ORIGIN-entry would be created. I haven't checked the source code
> > so I'm not 100% sure but this see
If memory serves me right, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:00:00AM +0100, Michiel Boland wrote:
> > Somewhere between 4.2 and 4.3, someone changed the default for CVS_RSH to
> > 'ssh'. This does not appear to be documented anywhere. The info file still
> > says that 'rsh' is th
If memory serves me right, "Ken Menzel" wrote:
> Hi, The RELNOTES.TXT file of freebsd-stable (beta) states in the
> disk section that DPT V RAID controllers are not supported, when in
> fact they now are with the new asr0 driver (noted in HARDWARE.TXT).
> Support for DPT V, and VI as well as ad
If memory serves me right, "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2001 23:49:40 -0500
> "Brian D. Woodruff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> BW> I would rather be consistent across my servers than have some be one
> BW> release past the others.
>
> Allow me to investigate this a li
If memory serves me right, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> No worries, it's all done, it just took me awhile to clear the haze of
> a long day from my brain and get to *all* the docs that needed
> updating. :) You might want to check now to verify that the
> tagged files have the proper contents though.
If memory serves me right, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Couple o' random thoughts, don't have time to look into this myself...
> This could be done as an extension to pkg_version, since much of the
> code you will need to manage versions is already there, and it's a
> logical extension of that program's
If memory serves me right, "Kenneth Mays" wrote:
> Downloaded the ISO of 4.4-PreRelease a few days ago. I was looking to
> set up Sendmail 8.11.6. Should I test any apps against 4.4-PreRelease or
> just stick with what is on the CD?
Hi Ken--
Don't know if anyone answered this or not but...I'd s
If memory serves me right, Mike Meyer wrote:
> H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> > Mike Meyer wrote:
> > > Ports are supposed to run on -STABLE and -CURRENT, and
> > > generally run on everything from that branch without to much trouble.
> > I would like to see that ports are supposed to run on -RELE
If memory serves me right, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Note that pkg_version uses the INDEX file, which is in the repository
> but not get up to date. For best results, you need to do a "make
> index" in /usr/ports.
Quick correction here...pkg_version (for 4.3-RELEASE and newer) will use
information enc
If memory serves me right, Mike Meyer wrote:
> I hadn't realized that pkg_version had been updated. That's cool.
>
> Can we get "make search" to use it?
H. I thought that "make search" essentially does its job by doing
a grep on the INDEX file, which includes all manner of things besides
If memory serves me right, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> The file which changed was:
> src/sys/conf/Makefile.i386
>
> For the RELENG_4 branch, the significant commit was:
> 1.179.2.6 done on Thu Oct 18th.
[snip]
Awesome...great explanation. Might be a couple days until my next
release
If memory serves me right, Sam Drinkard wrote:
> Just discovered the utility /usr/share/misc/file is either broken or has
> changed behavior. Now, in order to determine what a file is, I must
> append the -i switch. Did I miss or mess something up in the upgrade
> from 4.3-R to 4.4-Stable?
Errr
If memory serves me right, Wency Arzadon wrote:
> I've been installing freebsd44 with source tree I downloaded.
>
> I know the files are compress and tar.. My question is I'm trying to
> modify the source that gets installed especially src/etc/* files. I know
> this can be many ways, and i trie
If memory serves me right, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
>
> Oops, hiroo-san was already said what I have said just before:)
>
> hiroo> % or in the errata?
>
> Errata is for the post-release announcement; relnotes is better IMHO.
Right. I'm monitoring this discussion. You might not see anything
If memory serves me right, Joao Pedras wrote:
> Today's -stable :
[lib_baudrate.c breakage]
It's been fixed. Re-cvsup and try again. :-p
Bruce.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
If memory serves me right, Josh Tiefenbach wrote:
> > After doing some tests, I found that connecting to this 4.5-RC1 box
> > from other machine by OpenSSH (without RSA/DSA key, nor rhost*auth,
> > assuming to use plain password to login), requires opie to login,
> > though /etc/opiekeys, and /etc
If memory serves me right, "tony" wrote:
> is this documented somewhere?
Release notes, tuning(7), coming soon to the Handbook I believe.
> when I left the maxusers at 0 it said
> something along the lines of "max users set to 0, assuming 8" now 8 seems
> very low to me, will that in some way au
If memory serves me right, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > After cvsup'ing the ports tree, whats the best way to upgrade all
> > of the installed ports?
> >
> > Probably involves portugrade, but I'm not certain how to use it
> > for this?
> >
>
> nah
>
>
> pkg_version -c > update
> vi update
> (
If memory serves me right, "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> How about a Changelog? NOTES (HEAD) and UPDATING in /usr/src are one
> way, but a semi-automatic way of making changes transparent to the
> administrator would be a good start, i think.
How is this different from the release notes?
src/r
If memory serves me right, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 12:15, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Reilly igpond.net.au> typed:
> > > Second biggie: I have a Matrox MGA G200 video card that was well
> > > supported in earlier releases. The new release doesn't wo
If memory serves me right, "Thomas Gravgaard" wrote:
> I have been getting a massive amount of the following errors in my messages o
> ver the last couple of weeks :
>
> > m_clalloc failed, consider increase NMBCLUSTERS value
> > fxp0: cluster allocation failed, packet dropped!
>
> As far as I c
If memory serves me right, Matthias Andree wrote:
> It says ata(4) tags problems were related to motherboard-based ATA
> channels. I see that Søren's patch to fix the panic on boot that I
> observed has now been merged into 4-STABLE, however, it seems as though
> the "timeout and fall-back to PIO
If memory serves me right, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Does anyone know if it is safe to use -j with 'make release' for
> -stable?
As of 4.4, the answer was "no" (because Murray listed that as "future
work" in his release engineering article).
However, I've used WORLD_FLAGS in src/release/M
If memory serves me right, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 18:14, Brian Reichert wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:56:28PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > Did you use mergmaster to update the RC scripts, etc? If not, you
> > > should. If you did, it would have asked you to r
If memory serves me right, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> However, I was expecting to see an approximately 600MB cd image and
> all I see is:
>
> apollo:/usr/obj/release/R/cdrom# ls -la
> total 408420
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel512 Jun 7 23:13 .
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root
If memory serves me right, "Mike Grissom" wrote:
> About what time is the release going to be uploaded and officially released?
Soon. Please be patient. :-)
The src/ tree has been tagged, but final builds take some time and
there's usually a very quick round of testing that the head release
en
If memory serves me right, dnu wrote:
> I was reading about cvsup in the handbook and I'm a bit confused.
> It said that releng_4 is the main stable branch while releng_4_6
> is for critical fixes.
>
> So, if I cvs releng_4, do I also need to cvs releng_4_6?
No. You either grab one or the
If memory serves me right, John Prince wrote:
> Not wanting to resurrect a dead horse, and
> please do not refer me to the ERATTA page...
>
> Is anyone else looking/still looking into this problem?
> Is Soren back yet?
Did you see this patch posted to stable@?
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If memory serves me right, Murray Stokely wrote:
> 4.6.1 RC1 (i386) is available now on the major FreeBSD FTP sites.
> This is currently only available for net installs. Ports, packages,
> and documentation are not available. An ISO image will be created for
> RC2 with full packages. This RC
If memory serves me right, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> Anyone seen this?
>
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/SDBM_File
> cd sdbm && make all
> rm -rf libsdbm.a
> rm: libsdbm.a: Read-only file system
The Perl build process is a little picky about timestamps on files.
I've seen this happen when I've fo
If memory serves me right, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 04:50:28PM -0300, Vitor de Matos Carvalho wrote:
> > Because when it left the 4.1.1-release version turned STABLE?
>
> I may be wrong, but I believe that was before the invention of the security
> branches. 4.1.1-RELEASE wa
If memory serves me right, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:37:09PM -0700, Andy Sparrow wrote:
> >=20
> > > If you are experiencing any problems with -STABLE then by all means
> > > speak up now!
> >=20
> > Hi,
> >=20
> > Can we please MFC termcap.src so that the xterm/xterm-co
If memory serves me right, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Murray Stokely wrote:
> > If you are experiencing any problems with -STABLE then by all means
> > speak up now!
>
> Please, MFC fix for bin/40177 before 4.7-RELEASE, I think memory leak in
> /bin/sh is a quite seriou
If memory serves me right, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 02:48:59PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> [...]
> > I fear this is going to be a FAQ when 4.7 hits the streets... Wouldn't
> > this be a good entry for the /usr/src/UPDATING file? :)
>
> It's in the release notes. The vers
If memory serves me right, Arnvid Karstad wrote:
> Trying to install FreeBSD on one of the older dual cpu pentium pro
> machines we have and it always seem to freeze up around when it's
> supposed to wait 15 seconds for the scsi devices to settle.
>
> Tried to boot both 4.5 and 4.6.2 release cd'
If memory serves me right, "John Daniels" wrote:
> I am about to do a new install. I do not want to wait 10+ days
> for 4.7-REL.
>
> Will there be a 4.7-RC2? (if so, when?)
Yes. Probably later this week. Mostly this depends on some pkg_*
issues getting solved.
> Is there a way to get 4-STAB
If memory serves me right, Philip Paeps wrote:
> On 2002-09-24 08:42:33 (-0700), Bruce A. Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Due to some difficulties encountered while testing bzip2 packages for
> > FreeBSD 4.7-RC1, the Release Engineering team (with agreement from the Port
If memory serves me right, Christopher Vance wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 08:08:16AM +0100, Nick Barnes wrote:
> : So the system which I upgraded to -STABLE just last week, for the sole
> : purpose of getting a working "pkg_add -r" (i.e. one which understood
> : bzip), will now no longer have
As mentioned by an earlier email, 4-STABLE now uses gzip as the default
compression scheme for package building and installation. The ports
cluster has finished building a gzip package set...it'll hopefully make
its way to the FTP sites sometime soon. (FYI: This package set will
also be the bas
If memory serves me right, Jeff Love wrote:
> >Of course, if you installed the new system before building the new
> >kernel, you would not have hit this problem, but you are living
> >dangerously when you install the new world and try to run with the old
> >kernel.
> >
> That is exactly how I've
If memory serves me right, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> > In the end, the exact origin of RELENG_5_1 is much less likely to have
> > any real effect on anybody than the state of the code at the time the
> > branch is made.
>
> So this means that HEAD is still kept in a stable state, or at least stable
> A
If memory serves me right, "Ned Wolpert" wrote:
> > So this means that HEAD is still kept in a stable state, or at least
> > stable API-wise, so that 5.1 can be branched from it if needed? What
> > changes are 'planned' for 5.1? Any overview available? Of course it's
> > not going to be comprehens
If memory serves me right, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 09:11 AM 03/03/2003 -0800, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote:
> >Module: contrib_sendmail
> >Announced: 2003-03-03
> >Credits:Mark Dowd (ISS)
> >Affects:All releases prior to 4.8-RELEASE and 5.0-RELEASE-p4
> >
At this point, I'd guess probably not, given that there was (is?) some
amount of work for the MAINTAINER to do to get it to build correctly,
and there's not much chance for testing before the release, which is
only two weeks away.
That's just my guess, though, not a policy statement. :-)
Bruce.
If memory serves me right, Scott Sewall wrote:
>
> I'm trying to run make release of RELENG_4 on i386, and am getting the following
> error:
>
> checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
> /ltconfig: Can't open /ltconfig: No such file or directory
> configure: error: libtool configure fai
If memory serves me right, Julian Stacey wrote:
> Reference:
> > From: "David A. Gobeille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2003 18:21:00 -0600
> > Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "David A. Gobeille" wrote:
> > I noticed that there were quite a few files
If memory serves me right, Warner Joseph wrote:
> I know everyone involved has worked and continues
> to work really hard on both branches and as a
> user I really appreciate that. It's quite evident
> that there are other vendors who don't even come
> close to what you guys do!
Thanks, we try.
If memory serves me right, Warner Joseph wrote:
> >There's a 4.9 scheduled for release later this year / early next year.
> >4-STABLE will be around until 5.x is deemed ready for everyday,
> >production use and a 5-STABLE branch is created. This is tentatively
> >scheduled for 5.2, but may be
If memory serves me right, Damian Gerow wrote:
> I was working with tcpdump and tcpslice earlier today, and had a bit of a
> struggle when I found out that it's not Y2K compliant - it doesn't
> understand any year beyond 1999. After stating this on a mailing list, it
> was pointed out that the cur
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
