week ago) it was in dying Asus RS-120
which was running 6.2-RELEASE for about 6 month. So the problem is not
related to 6.2-RELEASE, but to hardware.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
(30MB) and then
install from internal CD-ROM or from network (FTP, NFS...). Or you can
create completely working instalation media with packeges etc on USB
stick bigger than 512MB.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
(restored from backup). I am
writing this as note to somebody who can investigate if there are
something wrong or not.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe
pluknet wrote:
Hello.
On 21/11/2007, Miroslav Lachman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not 100% sure, maybe I overlook something in binary major version
upgrade procedure, but after upgrade from 6.2 to 7.0-BETA3 my roots
~/.cshrc was "accidentally" replaced with dist version of
upgrade of all my 6.2 UP machines until 7.x UP will
behave better or 6.x will reach EOL.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
if anybody from them will
try your freebsd-update.sh upgrade from FreeBSD 6.2 to newer release
will lose pf.conf and end up with unfirewalled machine after reboot
without knowing it. (just like me)
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
, check HDD with smartmontools (from ports
tree), or try to switch from ataraid to gmirror.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[
not expect multiple occurrence of the same first part of
a hostname
example: johndoe.example.org and johndoe.comethingelse.org
3) script does not expect multiple occurrence of exactly matching
hostname (coused by jail zombies)
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> It is nice idea, but I think you should have a better scripting style ;)
Yes, it almost looked like perl. :-)
May I suggest a few further improvements?
> login_shell="/bin/tcsh"
I certainly wouldn't want tcsh. How about l
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We're using gmirror on our sun fire x2100 and FreeBSD 6.1-p10. Some days
ago I found this in the logs:
Apr 1 02:12:05 x2100 kernel: ad6: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error
(retrying request) LBA=612960533
Apr 1 02:12:05 x2100 k
otherboard BIOS
must support booting from more than one disk)
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
lder
if it is possible or somehow get a clean copy of the /usr/sbin/ folder
into my upgraded machine. Any hints on how to do that?
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
T
axvnodes="400000"
vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable="1"
vfs.zfs.arc_min="16M"
vfs.zfs.arc_max="128M"
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Ivan Voras wrote:
2009/4/8 Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz>:
(Lighttpd problem may be related to jail instead of ZFS - I did not test it
yet)
Completely unrelated to ZFS, but wasn't there some issue with lighttpd
and sendfile() relatively recently (sendfile is the default)? Hav
.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
there any know problems with Twin servers generally, or are there
any issus with FreeBSD 7.x with used CPU / chipsets / NICs?
Any advices will be welcomed.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Andrew Snow wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
are there somebody with some experiences (bad or good) with Supermicro
Twin servers? Mainly with 2U model 6026TT-TF or 1U model 6016TT-TF
build on top of Intel 5520 Tylersburg (or any other?)
They lack PS2 ports so you need USB keyboard to work
Louis Kowolowski wrote:
On Apr 30, 2009, at 6:09 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Hi all,
are there somebody with some experiences (bad or good) with
Supermicro Twin servers? Mainly with 2U model 6026TT-TF or 1U model
6016TT-TF build on top of Intel 5520 Tylersburg (or any other?)
We would
t=1000
to clear the begining of the disks. The next step should be to clear the
few last sectors, where metadata of GEOM mirror, journal, stripe etc.
are stored, so you end up with "clear disks" which you can use in
whatever setup you want without problem with old data, partitions
is
better place to ask.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2009-January/000702.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2008-December/000631.html
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
USB flash disk contains normal installation of the whole system, but
is set to read only in fstab. ZFS is used for /tmp /var /usr/ports
/usr/src /usr/obj and storage.
root filesystem is remounted read write only for some configuration
changes, then remounted back to read only.
Mirosla
backups of dozen webservers and mailserver.
I am using
mount -u -o current,rw /
[do some configuration work]
sync; sync; sync;
mount -u -o current,ro /
The sync command is maybe useless, but I feel safer with it ;o)
(root filesystem is not using soft-updates)
Miroslav Lachman
claudiu vasadi wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
Jun 7 21:10:47 da1 kernel: ad6: detached
Jun 7 21:10:47 da1 kernel: g_vfs_done():ad6s1d[READ(offset=86540058624,
length=16384)]error = 6
Jun 7 21:10:47 da1 kernel: g_vfs_done():a
o do?
I think BATCH=yes is unrelated to portmaster. This variable is (should
be) read by port build process it-self as if you build it by command cd
/usr/ports/category/port & make install clean
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@
about it in the announcement.
So my question is: Is it ok to do this binary upgrade without start
single user mode first?
If no, must I reboot my machine to enter single user mode?
I always did upgrade in multiuser for minimalising the downtime of servers.
M
allation CD/ISO, but if 7.2-RELEASE is installed on
the HDD with GENERIC kernel, remote console / keyboard works fine.
8.0 CD / ISO works fine. So in our case, the problem is only with 7.2
kernel used for installer, not with GENERIC kernel of running system.
Can you confirm this behavior?
M
~/# zpool list
NAMESIZEUSED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT
tank444G353G 91.2G79% ONLINE -
gmirror gms1 is for system files, ports etc. zpool (444GB) is for jails
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable
Mark Stapper wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[...]
Yes, I am using it this way:
r...@cage ~/# gmirror status
NameStatus Components
mirror/gms1 COMPLETE ad4s1
ad6s1
r...@cage ~/# zpool status
pool: tank
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config
.
Hi,
I did this (boot via usb to upgrade zfs /) a couple of months ago and
the system told me the zfs pool was owned by another machine. How can I
handle that?
I think zpool export and then zpool import should fix it. See the manpage.
Miroslav Lachman
___
an error occurs.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ch will be later the productive system.
If you only need jails with several IPs, IPv6 or noIPs, you can go for
7-STABLE. The multi-IP was committed right after the 7.2-RELEASE and I
an running it for half a year without any problems + cpuset ability
reached (about 50-60
parallel clients) the throughput drops down to 6 Mbps.
I can server hundereds of clients on same HW using Lighttpd not in jail
and UFS2 with gjournal instead of ZFS reaching 100 Mbps (maybe more).
I don't know if it is ZFS or Jail
Ivan Voras wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[..]
I have more strange issue with Lighttpd in jail on top of ZFS.
Lighttpd is serving static content (mp3 downloads thru flash player).
Is runs fine for relatively small number of parallel clients with
bandwidth about 30 Mbps, but after some number
re 7 jails, each with one or more IP addresses. No problem.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
t fresh instalation of FreeBSD 10.1 and some
services without any public content.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Jeremy Chadwick wrote on 10/29/2015 11:09:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:00:32AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote on 10/27/2015 06:05:
(I am not subscribed to the mailing list, please keep me CC'd)
Issue: a stable/10 system that has an abnormally high load average (e.g.
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 10/29/2015 12:47:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote on 10/29/2015 11:09:
[...]
I've seen it on both bare-metal and VMs. Please see c#8 in the ticket;
there's an itemised list of where I've seen it, but I'm sure it's not
limited to just those.
OK, I h
or current
version of the system (the version you need to update to) and then try this
cd /usr/src
mergemaster -F -v -i -P -U -t /var/tmp/mergemaster/anu_6002 -d -D
/jails/anu_6002
Miroslav Lachman
*** The directory specified for the temporary root environment,
/var/tmp/temproot, exists. Thi
Aristedes Maniatis wrote on 11/14/2015 14:22:
On 15/11/2015 12:14am, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I am getting a failure running mergemaster as per the FreeBSD handbook. I'm a
bit lost as to what the error is telling me to do.
What was the method used to upgrade host system and jail? Did you
performance or reliability? Or is this just outdated folklore?
It was on Solaris but not on FreeBSD. If you were using partitions on
Solaris the drive cache was disabled (or something like that, I am not
100% sure)
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable
rks fine on FreeBSD 8.4
Is it intentional behavior?
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Michael B. Eichorn wrote on 11/21/2015 21:42:
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:31 +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I noticed some weird behavior of "su" command in shell scripts
running
from cron after upgrade from FreeBSD 8.4 to 10.2.
If I have this in script
su -m www -c 'ls -l
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 11/22/2015 12:03:
Michael B. Eichorn wrote on 11/21/2015 21:42:
On Sat, 2015-11-21 at 13:31 +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I noticed some weird behavior of "su" command in shell scripts
running
from cron after upgrade from FreeBSD 8.4 to 10.2.
If I ha
Erich Dollansky wrote on 11/23/2015 00:31:
Hi,
On Sun, 22 Nov 2015 14:04:25 +0100
Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
Miroslav Lachman
The only workaround I found is adding
export TERM=""
at the top of the script.
this is a bit strange. TERM should be always de
pgraded
from central build server by "make installkernel && make installworld"
throught NFS mounted /usr/src and /usr/obj
I will try this script in clean FreeBSD 10.2 install in VirtualBox and
will report results later.
Thank you for your time!
Miroslav Lachman
build + install world and
kernel)
Anyway - it would be better to not have these partitions mounted with exec.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e back.
I think there is some bug (leftover) in make install / mtree or
something like this and those directories should not be created any more.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
he start of a more exhaustive sweep.
I suppose opening a PR could have helped but I procrastinated :-(.
OK, I will open PR for this today.
Thank you for your suggestions.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 01/16/2016 14:28:
Philippe Michel wrote on 01/16/2016 13:51:
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016, freebsd-stable-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
I updated the server 3 times in one week (to 10.2-p8, -p9, -p10).
Those directories were deleted by delete-old
# make
Was sshd ever killed? I think FreeBSD has some "exceptions" implemented
and some processes have higher value - not to be killed so easily.
I had some system without swap and there were many processes killed
every few days, but never sshd.
Miroslav Lachman
_
ned in manpage.
Is it error in default config or error in sshd? What should be fixed?
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &quo
Miroslav Lachman wrote on 04/05/2016 03:04:
I had "PrintLastLog yes" in my sshd_config for many years but after
upgrade to 10.3 I got this error message:
/etc/ssh/sshd_config line 112: Unsupported option PrintLastLog
It is confusing because "#PrintLastLog yes" is still
://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/11.0-CURRENT/base.txz)
the booting speed is back to normal.
Is it know problem? What was changed in loader between 10.3 and 11?
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https
with 10.3 loader and
hw.memtest.tests="0" in loader.conf
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
there will not be 10.4 Release, there is nothing to fix, because 11.0
works, I know...
But still - is this something already known and fixed in 11 loader or is
it something fixed by coincidence?
Can it be covered by some regression test?
Miroslav La
(8) in the base!
There are no plans to have pkg in base - not until base will be packaged
too. (there are good reasons for this)
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
eft unfixed.
mrsas is very strange so I moved to mfi driver for Dell PowerEdge T130
with PERC H330.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200993
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
t;shutdown -r now" and
then everything booted fine.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ess. It is much faster transfer than making
archives.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Jonathan Haack wrote on 2016/10/19 10:09:
Awe geez ... pkg won't work ... says "shared object "libssl.so.7" not found, required by
"pkg"
Do not panic, just run pkg-static to upgrade pkg it-self
/usr/local/sbin/pkg-static in
Matthew Seaman wrote on 2016/10/19 11:08:
On 2016/10/19 09:55, Matt Smith wrote:
On Oct 19 10:38, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jonathan Haack wrote on 2016/10/19 10:09:
Awe geez ... pkg won't work ... says "shared object "libssl.so.7" not
found, required by "pkg"
x27;s not 100% reproducible (I mean, if I
fill the directory with dozens of thousands of files, I will not
certainly get this lag after the deletion).
What about snapshots? Are there any snapshots on this filesystem?
Or scrub running in the background?
Miroslav Lachman
_
mirroring from the time when it
was introduced. It was always working with MRB/BSD.
gmirror label gm0 ada0 ada1
And then you can use fdisk + bsdlabel or gpart to create slices and
partitions and set it bootable on /dev/mirror/gm0.
I didn't tried it with FreeBSD 10.3, but it works with 8.
ded. Or recycling freed JID. It
was few years ago when I talked about this with BZ.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk0tank0 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk1tank0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
# uname -srmi
FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p1
Steven Hartland wrote on 2016/12/02 02:06:
Are you sure your kernel and world are in sync?
Yes, built from sources on our build server and then distributed by NFS
to all machines:
# freebsd-version -u
10.3-RELEASE-p12
# freebsd-version -k
10.3-RELEASE-p12
On 01/12/2016 23:53, Miroslav
from backups.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
edit rights. Probably someone needs to clean up and merge many of
these pages: https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/
I changed the page, now it has 512k for boot partition.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebs
periodic tasks.
The best way is to randomize these times on jail creation time.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-s
t know if the G suffix is stripped by formatting to columns / size
of field is limited to 4 characters if '-h' is used or anything else.
The FS is ZFS if this matters.
Is this known issue? Should I file PR for this?
Miroslav Lachman
___
f
ut not by freebsd-update. We are using
make installkernel + make installworld method. 9.3 to 11.1 can work
similarly.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe,
jail name.
path= "/usr/jail/$name";
exec.consolelog = "/var/log/jail/$name.console";
mount.fstab = "/etc/fstab.$name";
## Jail www
www {
host.hostname = "jailname.example.com";
ip4.addr = 10.10.10.10;
allow.r
booting with fresh image of CURRENT (12.0).
You can find it on ftp.freebsd.org
/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/12.0
Or you can try to boot some older ISO like 10.3. I remember some
regression years ago with booting problem on newer version.
Miroslav Lachman
100% 4204k
I tried to run areca-cli but it also shows nothing. OS is running from
RAID device da0 fine, but controller info is inaccessible.
Was there some changes between 10.3 / 10.4?
What can I do to debug this problem?
Kind regards
Miroslav Lach
e sure everything is OK.
There is (maybe) simpler way - download (or create own) tar balls of
base and kernel of your target version (10.4 or 11.1), unpack it over
old system (in single user) then you can use make delete-old if you will
have /usr/s
t; | logger
cp "$notify_state.now" "$notify_state"
fi
rm "$notify_state.now" "$notify_state.diff"
fi
else
if [ -f "$notify_state" ]; then
rm "$notify_state"
subject="$subject_pref n
'ssi_cables'
[-Wmissing-variable-declarations]
const char *ssi_cables[] =
^
1 warning generated.
buildworld continued and I was able to run installworld so it seems
"everything" works, but I think there should not be these errors.
Miroslav Lachman
_
the question is - If I want to plot "busy %" in the graph - how the
"busy" value in the first example is calculated?
Is it possible to calculate it from the numbers that I have from "iostat
-I -x" and the know time interval between two runs?
Miroslav Lachman
_
verage of these last 60
seconds. But it also means monitoring probe will wait 60 seconds to get
this value (each time) so it is the same problem as I described in my
original post with "iostat -x".
Miroslav Lachman
Am 20.06.2018 um 16:55 schrieb Miroslav Lachman
<000.f...@quip
Warner Losh wrote on 2018/06/20 18:13:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz
<mailto:000.f...@quip.cz>> wrote:
I would like to know how the value of disk "busy" is calculated?
I want to use values from iostat in the monitorin
set" takes only numerical ID of the jail...
Shouldn't it be consistent across all FreeBSD base utilities so all of
them can use numerical ID and name?
Should I file a PR for it?
Miroslav Lachman
PS: I am on FreeBSD 10.4 so I don't know if something is different in
newer branches
Chris H wrote on 2018/06/22 23:46:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:13:17 +0200 "Miroslav Lachman" <000.f...@quip.cz>
said
I don't know if it is better to discuss it in jail@ or stable@ list so
a do cross-post.
FreeBSD has many jail aware utilities but they are inconsist
James Gritton wrote on 2018/06/23 17:30:
On 2018-06-22 16:03, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Chris H wrote on 2018/06/22 23:46:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 23:13:17 +0200 "Miroslav Lachman"
<000.f...@quip.cz> said
I don't know if it is better to discuss it in jail@ or stable@ lis
cpuset
and sockstat).
Thank you very much. I really appreciate your neverending work on jails!
I hope it will be committed soon.
Kind regards
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-s
c_t column anymore and there are ms/r ms/w ms/o and
ms/t columns not mentioned in man page.
Is it a documentation bug?
Is ms/t the same what was previously known as svc_t?
Kind regards
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
Will Andrews wrote on 2018/08/20 15:33:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 9:30 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote this message on Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 02:29 +0200:
I upgraded one of our servers from 10.4 to 11.2 and scripts using output
of "iostat -x" are not working anymore.
/pkgdb.rb:957:in `autofix'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:475:in `main'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:718:in `main'
from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:815:in `initialize'
from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:209:in `main'
f
knowledge - from where goes this error? What should be
fixed? Ruby-bdb or portupgrade?
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
0: provider mirror/gm0 launched.
GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: rebuilding provider ad4.
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/mirror/gm0s1a
bge0: link state changed to UP
uname:
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE #0: Sun May 7 04:42:56 UTC 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386
Miroslav Lachman
will not fail after 1 day, problem is solved)
At last - now I think this was not GEOM/gmirror related. I tried remove
ad8 provider from gmirror (gm0), boot up system from gm0 with one
provider (ad4) and test ad8 mounted separately - ad8 failed again
Johan Ström wrote:
[...]
On 17 jul 2006, at 17.40, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
[..]
Install the smartmontools from
/usr/ports/sysutils/smartmontools/
and post the output of
smartctl -a /dev/ad8
smartmontools was previously installed and running as daemon without
any bad
days).
Please let me now, if you also have nonzero Reallocated_Sector_Ct in
smartctl -A output.
I will test those servers with brand new Samsung drives, hope that it helps.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
one can not use SATA / ICH7 under high load in
FreeBSD 6.1 (tested on RELEASE and STABLE) (I am not so HW / FreeBSD
experienced to locate the problem by myself)
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Igor Robul wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I upgraded to RELENG_6, changed all HW (whole servers and changed
Seagate HHDs to Samsung so every piece of HW is different from time of
my first post), but after one week I got the same error and system
eds - from 2.5MB/s to 15MB/s, so the
whole synchronization is done after more then 5 hours (the longest was
20 hours to synchronize 250GB HDDs)
I don't know what more can I test, what more could be done to solve
these problems. :(
Any help will be appreciated
M
Greg Byshenk wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:51:29PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Greg Byshenk wrote:
[...]
This happened four times (with the same errors that have been discussed
here), running 6.1 STABLE as of June 22. Before attempting to RMA the
drives, I tried an updated kernel
Matt Dawson wrote:
On Monday 21 August 2006 13:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can confirm the same behaviour with a ULi M1689/Newcastle Athlon64
based system running 6.1-RELEASE-p3 (i386). ad6 just detaches without
warning and it takes a reboot to bring it back. atacontrol reinit has no
effect
27;config' which should be used if you are on a system where you do
not have the time or the disc space to rebuild the world and simply want
to recompile the kernel ?
AFAIK you can use make buildkernel && make installkernel without
recompiling whole world if you have system
1. find out pci handle of your SMB controller:
# pciconf -lv | fgrep 0x0c0500 -A 4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:1: class=0x0c0500 card=0x5348108e chip=0x005210de rev=0xa2
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation'
device = 'nForce4 SMBus'
class= serial bus
subclass = SMBus
2. read
al CD/DVD drive.
I do not understand this part of system well, but let me know if I can
provide some more information about systems where I can boot well or
where I can not boot FreeBSD from USB CD / DVD.
Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-stable@freebs
201 - 300 of 324 matches
Mail list logo
