Re: Dell XPS 8940 SATA and NVMe disk controller not recognized

Hello :-) You may take a look at http://bsd-hardware.info/ report your hardware issues and see if other people have it working :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailm

Re: Dell XPS 8940 SATA and NVMe disk controller not recognized

On Sun, Apr 4, 2021, 00:10 Karl Dunn wrote: > That worked, precisely as it did for you: gpart list shows partitions > and drives much to my expectations, and Win10 no longer boots. I can > boot windows by setting the BIOS config back to RAID. That's not much > of a pain. Now to try installing

Re: Dell XPS 8940 SATA and NVMe disk controller not recognized

On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:25:30PM -0500, Karl Dunn wrote: > I have new Dell XPS 8940 that came with Windows 10 Home installed. I have > created two partitions for FreeBSD, one on its NMVe 256GB SSD, and one on > its WD 1TB HD. > > For now, I have 12.2-RELEASE-p4 GENERIC on a USB memstick, so I

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

On Sat, 2021-04-03 at 16:39 -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system > before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447 > (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page. > I had originally planned to try to do this before 13.0, b

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

I'm actually in shock that you would propose such a thing! Many wysiwyg web builders still use ftp as their publishing mechanism. I'd bet that most freebsd servers out there have ftpd enabled, but of course that's just my opinion. I really wish it would do secure ftp, but that's another discussi

Re: Dell XPS 8940 SATA and NVMe disk controller not recognized

> On Apr 3, 2021, at 2:37 PM, Barney Wolff wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:25:30PM -0500, Karl Dunn wrote: >> I have new Dell XPS 8940 that came with Windows 10 Home installed. I have >> created two partitions for FreeBSD, one on its NMVe 256GB SSD, and one on >> its WD 1TB HD. >> >>

Re: FreeBSD 13.0-RC5 Now Available

On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 9:34 AM Glen Barber wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > The fifth RC build of the 13.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available. > > Installation images are available for: > > o 13.0-RC5 amd64 GENERIC > o 13.0-RC5 i386 GENERIC > o 13.0-RC5 powerpc G

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

On 03/04/2021 22:39, Ed Maste wrote: I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447 (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page. I had originally planned to try to do this before 13.0, but it dropped off my

Re: FreeBSD 13.0-RC5 Now Available

On Sun, Apr 4, 2021 at 3:38 PM Colin Percival wrote: > On 4/4/21 1:50 PM, Alan Somers wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 9:34 AM Glen Barber > > wrote: > > > > The fifth RC build of the 13.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available. > > > > In the past, making these release

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

> On 5 Apr 2021, at 00:22, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote: > > On 03/04/2021 22:39, Ed Maste wrote: >> I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system >> before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447 >> (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the ma

Re: FreeBSD 13.0-RC5 Now Available

Is it necessary to quote the *entire* email (including checksums)? Glen Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity and/or typos. > On Apr 4, 2021, at 4:50 PM, Alan Somers wrote: >  > On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 9:34 AM Glen Barber wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 at 08:40, Ed Maste wrote: > > I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system > before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447 > (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page. > I had originally planned to try to do this before 13.0, but

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

> On 03/04/2021 22:39, Ed Maste wrote: > > I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system > > before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447 > > (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page. > > I had originally planned to try to do this before 13.0, but i

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >> On 03/04/2021 22:39, Ed Maste wrote: >> > I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system >> > before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447 >> > (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page. >> > I had originally planned to try

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

My vote is for no. Reasoning is simple... at what point does it stop?  By continuously moving stuff from base to ports, FreeBSD slowly becomes just a Kernel. 😉 On 4/3/2021 4:39 PM, Ed Maste wrote: I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system before FreeBSD 14, and open

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

My vote is also for no. I still use it on most of my systems. Easy to configure easy to use. On Sun, 4 Apr 2021, Daniel Morante via freebsd-stable wrote: My vote is for no. Reasoning is simple... at what point does it stop?  By continuously moving stuff from base to ports, FreeBSD slowly

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

> On Apr 4, 2021, at 8:05 PM, Daniel Morante via freebsd-stable > wrote: > > My vote is for no. > > Reasoning is simple... at what point does it stop? By continuously moving > stuff from base to ports, FreeBSD slowly becomes just a Kernel. 😉 That’s a +1 here, both for the “keep it” and for

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

On Sun., Apr. 4, 2021, 5:04 p.m. Rick Macklem, wrote: > > I wonder what others find convenient when moving files to/from > Windows? > SCP works beautifully for transferring files to/from Windows stations. Haven't needed FTP support for about a decade now at $WORK and at home. SSH has quickly bec

Re: Deprecating base system ftpd?

On 05.04.2021 06:25, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > Eugene mentioned the convenience of ftpd in the same sentence as ipsec. > I'm willing to bet those systems have ports installed too. Ports/packages are great but they are not replacement for solid operating system with bundled software tested and pro