> On Apr 4, 2021, at 8:05 PM, Daniel Morante via freebsd-stable > <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> wrote: > > My vote is for no. > > Reasoning is simple... at what point does it stop? By continuously moving > stuff from base to ports, FreeBSD slowly becomes just a Kernel. đ
Thatâs a +1 here, both for the âkeep itâ and for the comment above regarding complete OS vs. kernel and a teeny userland. Ideally, weâd modernize ftpd to support TLS. The PITA with ports solutions is you immediate run into the issue of which of the many ftp daemons is going to fit your needs and not require some non-trivial amount of configuration. The stock ftpd âjust worksâ for local user accounts and has a simple method for blocking of swaths of users from using it if that sort of restriction is needed. This reminds me of Apple removing the telnet client. Sure, most people donât *need* telnet, but itâs handy to have, both as a simple test tool and as a way to get into old crufty network gear that never moved on to ssh. Charles > > On 4/3/2021 4:39 PM, Ed Maste wrote: >> I propose deprecating the ftpd currently included in the base system >> before FreeBSD 14, and opened review D26447 >> (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26447) to add a notice to the man page. >> I had originally planned to try to do this before 13.0, but it dropped >> off my list. FTP is not nearly as relevant now as it once was, and it >> had a security vulnerability that secteam had to address. >> >> I'm happy to make a port for it if anyone needs it. Comments? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" >> >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
