On 03/03/2018 00:23, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Indeed. I have had the following for a few years now, due to USB drives
> with ZFS pools:
>
> --- /usr/src/etc/rc.d/zfs 2016-11-08 10:21:29.820131000 +0100
> +++ /etc/rc.d/zfs 2016-11-08 12:49:52.971161000 +0100
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>
> zfs_st
On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, tech-lists wrote:
On 03/03/2018 00:23, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Indeed. I have had the following for a few years now, due to USB drives
with ZFS pools:
--- /usr/src/etc/rc.d/zfs 2016-11-08 10:21:29.820131000 +0100
+++ /etc/rc.d/zfs 2016-11-08 12:49:52.971161000 +0
On 03/03/2018 12:56, Bruce Evans wrote:
> That won't work for the boot drive.
In my case the workaround is fine because it's not a boot drive
--
J.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
03.03.2018 19:56, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, tech-lists wrote:
>
>> On 03/03/2018 00:23, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> Indeed. I have had the following for a few years now, due to USB drives
>>> with ZFS pools:
>>>
>>> --- /usr/src/etc/rc.d/zfs2016-11-08 10:21:29.820131000 +0100
>>
Hi and thanks!
First time using/needing a patch could you give me a short advise how to use it
and for which version?
So far I have made a fresh FreeBSD 11.1 RELEASE install as a VM on a ESXi host
updated the system and did a svn checkout
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/11.1.0/
Then tried
Oops! I got Subject & body wrong s/inetd/init/ !
Was:memory leak in inetd 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
Should be: memory leak in init 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
Hi sta...@freebsd.org
I think I have found a memory leak with init on 10.3-STABLE
(server runs in a VM); server
That won't work for the boot drive.
When no boot drive is detected early enough, the kernel goes to the
mountroot prompt. That seems to hold a Giant lock which inhibits
further progress being made. Sometimes progress can be made by trying
to mount unmountable partitions on other drives, but
03.03.2018 23:11, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Oops! I got Subject & body wrong s/inetd/init/ !
>
> Was:memory leak in inetd 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
> Should be: memory leak in init 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
There is no evidence that /sbin/init has memory leak (nor ine
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 03.03.2018 23:11, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
> > Oops! I got Subject & body wrong s/inetd/init/ !
> >
> > Was:memory leak in inetd 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
> > Should be: memory leak in init 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
>
> There is no evidence t
03.03.2018 23:33, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 03.03.2018 23:11, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>>
>>> Oops! I got Subject & body wrong s/inetd/init/ !
>>>
>>> Was:memory leak in inetd 10.3-STABLE .svn_revision 304147 ?
>>> Should be: memory leak in init 10.3-STABLE .svn_
Hi, Reference:
> From: Eugene Grosbein
> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2018 23:48:42 +0700
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 03.03.2018 23:33, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
> > Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> >> 03.03.2018 23:11, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> >>
> >>> Oops! I got Subject & body wrong s/inetd/init/
Hi all,
can anyone get ddd get to work in 11.1-R or stable?
It seems that ddd from the ports is hanging while trying to get a
connection to gdb, tried the system gdb and the gdb-8.0.1 from the
ports.
What's happening here?
Regards,
Holm
--
Technik Service u. Handel Tiffe, www.tsht.de,
NAGY Andreas wrote:
>Hi and thanks!
>
>First time using/needing a patch could you give me a short advise how to use
>it >and for which version?
The only difference with kernel versions will be the line#s.
>So far I have made a fresh FreeBSD 11.1 RELEASE install as a VM on a ESXi host
>>updated th
13 matches
Mail list logo
