NAGY Andreas wrote: >Hi and thanks! > >First time using/needing a patch could you give me a short advise how to use >it >and for which version? The only difference with kernel versions will be the line#s. >So far I have made a fresh FreeBSD 11.1 RELEASE install as a VM on a ESXi host >>updated the system and did a svn checkout >http://svn.freebsd.org/base/release/11.1.0/ > >Then tried to apply the patch in /usr/src/sys via patch < >/tmp/reclaimcom2.patch > >Output was: >Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... >The text leading up to this was: >-------------------------- >|--- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdserv.c.savrecl 2018-02-10 20:34:31.166445000 >-0500 >|+++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdserv.c 2018-02-10 20:36:07.947490000 -0500 >-------------------------- >Patching file fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdserv.c using Plan A... >No such line 4225 in input file, ignoring >Hunk #1 succeeded at 4019 (offset -207 lines). >done Since it says "Hunk #1 succeeded...", I think it patched ok. However, you can check by looking at nfsrvd_reclaimcomplete() in sys/fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdserv.c. Before the patch it would look like: if (*tl == newnfs_true) nd->nd_repstat = NFSERR_NOTSUPP; else nd->nd_repstat = nfsrv_checkreclaimcomplete(nd); whereas after being patched, it will look like: nd->nd_repstat = nfsrv_checkreclaimcomplete(nd); if (*tl == newnfs_true) nd->nd_repstat = 0;
rick [stuff snipped] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
