Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 08:42:44PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> >
> > > zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well
> > > as amd64.
> > >
> >
> > Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed on
Glen Barber wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 07:44:43PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> > > Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM.
> >
> > The only correct answer to "how much RAM do you need to run ZFS" is
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:51:07PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 07/23/15 16:21, Stari Karp wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I had a problems with FreeBSD 10.2-BETA2. I used freebsd-update
> > ugrade and update FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. Is it possible to downg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 7/24/15 00:20, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:51:07PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 07/23/15 16:21, Stari Karp wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I had a problems with FreeBSD 1
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:11AM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
>
> On 7/24/15 00:20, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 04:51:07PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
> >>
> >> On 07/
On 07/24/15 07:58, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> ..interrestingly people here seem to focus my problem to ZFS.. but my
> problem was to build an raid over 4 disks on my old i386 machine and that
> failed with 2 different approaches.
>
> I'm accepting that ZFS is a too big thing for the i386 architecture
> a
On 07/24/15 07:58, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> ..interrestingly people here seem to focus my problem to ZFS.. but my
> problem was to build an raid over 4 disks on my old i386 machine and that
> failed with 2 different approaches.
>
> I'm accepting that ZFS is a too big thing for the i386 architecture
> a
Hello,
I’ve made the experience that enabling local_unbound does not play too well
if I am using a chroot’ed unbound environment like chroot: “/var/unbound” in
the configuration file.
In particular, there is no way to automatically mount a devfs and create a link
to the syslog socket. Also, the
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 07/24/15 07:58, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> > ..interrestingly people here seem to focus my problem to ZFS.. but my
> > problem was to build an raid over 4 disks on my old i386 machine and that
> > failed with 2 different approaches.
> >
> > I'm accepting that ZFS is a too big
On Jul 24 12:27, John Marshall wrote:
I have submitted a patch to the distributed ntp.conf to enable ntpd pool
client functionality. This was not possible in the ancient version of
ntpd shipped with FreeBSD releases over the past several years.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:54:00AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually I'm quite sucessfully running zfs on i386 (in a VM) ... here's
>> the trick (which leads me to suspect ARC handling as the problem) - when
>> I get to 512M of kernel space or less than 1G of
On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 16:51 -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> On 07/23/15 16:21, Stari Karp wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I had a problems with FreeBSD 10.2-BETA2. I used freebsd-update
> > ugrade and update FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. Is it possible to downgrade
> > BETA2 to 10.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update upgrade -r 1
> I had a problems with FreeBSD 10.2-BETA2. I used freebsd-update ugrade
> and update FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE.
> Is it possible to downgrade BETA2 to 10.1-RELEASE with freebsd-update
> upgrade -r 10.1-RELEASE, please?
In my experience, downgrading with freebsd-update works fine, although I only
went
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> ...more RAM? Always more RAM?
For ZFS, yes. Stick to UFS otherwise.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net
unix, openafs,
Bezüglich Matt Smith's Nachricht vom 24.07.2015 11:35 (localtime):
> On Jul 24 12:27, John Marshall wrote:
>> I have submitted a patch to the distributed ntp.conf to enable ntpd pool
>> client functionality. This was not possible in the ancient version of
>> ntpd shipped with FreeBSD releases ove
Bezüglich Ian Lepore's Nachricht vom 12.07.2015 17:41 (localtime):
> And let's all just hope that a week or two of testing is enough when
> jumping a major piece of software forward several years in its
> independent evolution.
…
> I wonder how many other such things could be lurking in 4.2.8, wai
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:50:52 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote
> On 07/24/15 07:58, Holm Tiffe wrote:
> > ..interrestingly people here seem to focus my problem to ZFS.. but my
> > problem was to build an raid over 4 disks on my old i386 machine and that
> > failed with 2 different approaches.
> >
> > I
Bezüglich Harald Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 24.07.2015 15:19
(localtime):
> Bezüglich Ian Lepore's Nachricht vom 12.07.2015 17:41 (localtime):
>> And let's all just hope that a week or two of testing is enough when
>> jumping a major piece of software forward several years in its
>> independent
Hi!
> 1. VT module doesn't load.
> In /boot/loader.conf I have:
> kern.vty=vt
> but it doesn't work. If I manual loada module witk kldload radeonkms I
> got just black screen and nothing more.
As I know it's not a module. And you can't load it.
I have a workstation under 10.2-BETA2 amd64
Hi Melifaro,
Bug persists.
(root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 list
(root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 add 0.0.0.0/8
(root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 list
::/8 0
(root@mail)[/usr/src]# uname -a
FreeBSD mail.stefaninogueira.com 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE
#1 r285832: Fri Jul
Hi!
> Bug persists.
>
> (root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 list
>
> (root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 add 0.0.0.0/8
> (root@mail)[/usr/src]# ipfw table 22 list
> ::/8 0
Do you have a problem report for this in bugzilla ? I try to poke re@
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi!
> Do you have a problem report for this in bugzilla ? I try to poke re@
Found it:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200169
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
___
freebsd-stable@free
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
> ...more RAM? Always more RAM?
>
> Reality check please, this is an i386 Machine with 2 Gbytes.
> It has two of 3 sockets polluted with RAM Modules (1G), there is not
> that
> much Space to give it more RAM.
>
> i386 is a supported architecture as far as I know, ok it where nice to
> have i
Hi!
> This one was fixed in r266310 (based on bin/189471) but I haven't
> merged it to -stable.
Because it changes ip_fw.h, would it break KABI or ABI ?
Would that prevent a merge to 10.2 ?
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
_
On 24-07-2015 11:31, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
This one was fixed in r266310 (based on bin/189471) but I haven't
merged it to -stable.
Because it changes ip_fw.h, would it break KABI or ABI ?
Would that prevent a merge to 10.2 ?
I do not know if it affects the rule or whether it is merely visual
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Marcelo Gondim
wrote:
> On 24-07-2015 11:31, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> This one was fixed in r266310 (based on bin/189471) but I haven't
>>> merged it to -stable.
>>>
>> Because it changes ip_fw.h, would it break KABI or ABI ?
>> Would that prevent a mer
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:50:10AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > >
> > > For me -- degradate network performance, about 30%. I am do
> > > verification now, by downgrading kernel.
> >
> > What kind of workload and what NIC are you using?
>
> Chelsio T580-LP-CR, http serving.
> r276179 can
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:25:55AM -0700, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:50:10AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For me -- degradate network performance, about 30%. I am do
> > > > verification now, by downgrading kernel.
> > >
> > > What kind of workload and
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 06:40 -0700, timp wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > 1. VT module doesn't load.
> > In /boot/loader.conf I have:
> > kern.vty=vt
> > but it doesn't work. If I manual loada module witk kldload radeonkms I
> > got just black screen and nothing more.
>
> As I know it's not a module. A
accessing hardware isn't free. Locking also isn't free. That's why
there's this mechanism.
-adrian
On 24 July 2015 at 08:58, wrote:
>
> OK.
>
> I read the document and understood it I guess.
> Very interesting, and well engineered.
>
> On x86/i386/amd64, could not all this be replaced by a s
OK.
I read the document and understood it I guess.
Very interesting, and well engineered.
On x86/i386/amd64, could not all this be replaced by a simple call to apic
timer ?
We would get the timestamp, we can even store it, make calculation on top of it.
My jugement may miss something important
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 06:40 -0700, timp wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > 1. VT module doesn't load.
> > In /boot/loader.conf I have:
> > kern.vty=vt
> > but it doesn't work. If I manual loada module witk kldload radeonkms I
> > got just black screen and nothing more.
>
> As I know it's not a module. A
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
2015-07-24 19:17 GMT+03:00 Stari Karp :
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 06:40 -0700, timp wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> > 1. VT module doesn't load.
>> > In /boot/loader.conf I have:
>> > kern.vty=vt
>> > but it doesn't work. If I manual loada module witk kldload radeonkms I
>> > got just black screen and nothin
2015-07-24 18:43 GMT+03:00 Stari Karp :
> On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 06:40 -0700, timp wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> > 1. VT module doesn't load.
>> > In /boot/loader.conf I have:
>> > kern.vty=vt
>> > but it doesn't work. If I manual loada module witk kldload radeonkms I
>> > got just black screen and nothin
I noticed that in stable/10, /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf was switched from
using latest package set to whichever one that is "quarterly" word is
pointing to at the moment. What is the motivation for this change?
Quarterly package sets are useful if the end-user is able to pick which
one to pull from
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 23:07 +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> 2015-07-24 18:43 GMT+03:00 Stari Karp :
> > On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 06:40 -0700, timp wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> > 1. VT module doesn't load.
> >> > In /boot/loader.conf I have:
> >> > kern.vty=vt
> >> > but it doesn't work. If I manual lo
On 24 Jul, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
> Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Should r282973 and r283060 be MFCed to FreeBSD 10? On amd64 and i386,
>> which use clang as their base compiler and don't have gcc in base by
>> default, the math/scilab port uses clang for cc and
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 23:07 +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> 2015-07-24 19:17 GMT+03:00 Stari Karp :
> > On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 06:40 -0700, timp wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> > 1. VT module doesn't load.
> >> > In /boot/loader.conf I have:
> >> > kern.vty=vt
> >> > but it doesn't work. If I manual lo
On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 23:07 +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> 2015-07-24 18:43 GMT+03:00 Stari Karp :
> > On Fri, 2015-07-24 at 06:40 -0700, timp wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> > 1. VT module doesn't load.
> >> > In /boot/loader.conf I have:
> >> > kern.vty=vt
> >> > but it doesn't work. If I manual lo
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:15:52PM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> I noticed that in stable/10, /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf was switched from using
> latest package set to whichever one that is "quarterly" word is pointing to
> at the moment. What is the motivation for this change?
>
This was not done
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:15:28PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 24 Jul, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> > I'm not fond of lang/gcc as openmp "provider": if a port use c++, it
> > will cause linkage headaches with libc++ (I never was able to have
> > graphics/darktable working, for example).
>
> You might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
The first RC build of the 10.2-RELEASE release cycle is now available.
Installation images are available for:
o amd64 GENERIC
o i386 GENERIC
o ia64 GENERIC
o powerpc GENERIC
o powerpc64 GENERIC64
o sparc64 GENERIC
The image checksums follow at the
On 2015-07-24 17:27, Glen Barber wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:15:52PM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
I noticed that in stable/10, /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf was switched from
using
latest package set to whichever one that is "quarterly" word is
pointing to
at the moment. What is the motivation
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:23:12PM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> On 2015-07-24 17:27, Glen Barber wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 05:15:52PM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> >>I noticed that in stable/10, /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf was switched from
> >>using
> >>latest package set to whichever one t
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 06:36:32PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 08:25:55AM -0700, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:50:10AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > For me -- degradate network performance, about 30%. I am do
> > > > >
47 matches
Mail list logo
