Hi,
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 12:44:36PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Bottom line: people enable compression on an fs, issue large amounts of
> write I/O to that fs (say hundreds of megabytes, or gigabytes), and
> start to see the entire system intermittently stalling hard (for
> multiple seconds
Hello,
I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on an IBM x3550 M3 server.
Installation went smoothly, RAID controller and network cards were
successfully recognised.
But, after the installation, the server fails to boot from disk.
There were some posts, about two years ago, in this list implying
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163843
The fix was committed to -current, but in 9.1 it's still not working.
cheersRuben
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, sen
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:23:53 +0200
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on an IBM x3550 M3 server.
> Installation went smoothly, RAID controller and network cards were
> successfully recognised.
>
> But, after the installation, the server fails t
Hello :-)
I have found 9.1 to be far more less responsive than 9.0 and previous
releases on my desktop. I have noted this slow down at 9.1-RC. I have
AMD64 4GB RAM i3 CPU and when I simply run Chromium, VBox with Windows
XP 64bit (1GB allocated) and VBox with Ubuntu 64bit (1GB allocated) my
machin
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, CeDeROM wrote:
> Hello :-)
>
> I have found 9.1 to be far more less responsive than 9.0 and previous
> releases on my desktop. I have noted this slow down at 9.1-RC. I have
> AMD64 4GB RAM i3 CPU and when I simply run Chromium, VBox with Windows
> XP 64bit (1GB all
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> You can try to switch to emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy which is
> VirtualBox 4.1.x
> just to rule out that this is a vbox regression. Just be sure to power
> down the VMs
> first.
> It would be interesting to watch if the machine starts
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:06 PM, CeDeROM wrote:
> I have found 9.1 to be far more less responsive than 9.0 and previous
> releases on my desktop.
Right now as I backup my data (~250GB) I also notice deadlocks on data
transfers. I also noticed that on another machine (6 cores, 16GB RAM)
with 9.1-R
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:48 PM, CeDeROM wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>> You can try to switch to emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy which is
>> VirtualBox 4.1.x
>> just to rule out that this is a vbox regression. Just be sure to power
>> down the VMs
>> first.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
> VBox itself also needs some RAM and the emulated Graphics Card which
> can easily be 128M per VM.
This is what I get with CP and one VBox running - memory use is not
that high but the responsiveness is getting low now:
last pid: 20852;
Greetings,
I received the following last night:
Feb 10 23:31:20 udns kernel: t_delta 16.0106d62009e53600 too long
Feb 10 23:31:36 udns kernel: t_delta 15.fefb2d70ffb0bf00 too short
While I'm _guessing_ disk, I'm not sure from where it originates.
Should I be concerned?
Thank you for all your ti
On 11/2/2013 14:11, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:23:53 +0200
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on an IBM x3550 M3 server.
Installation went smoothly, RAID controller and network cards were
successfully recognised.
But, after the
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Panagiotis Christias
wrote:
> On 11/2/2013 14:11, Erich Dollansky wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:23:53 +0200
>> Panagiotis Christias wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on an IBM x3550 M3 server.
>>> Installation wen
Le jeudi 7 février 2013 10:55:09 Andriy Gapon a écrit :
> Without so much as a stack trace there is nothing to chew on.
> A useable vmcore would be better.
>
> Did you perhaps use kgdb with a mismatching kernel?
--
I still have panic, and recompiled kernel, the stack info is not better but I
ha
on 11/02/2013 22:33 David Demelier said the following:
> Le jeudi 7 février 2013 10:55:09 Andriy Gapon a écrit :
>> Without so much as a stack trace there is nothing to chew on.
>> A useable vmcore would be better.
>>
>> Did you perhaps use kgdb with a mismatching kernel?
Please don't leave stray
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 1:16:16 pm CeDeROM wrote:
> Hey :-) I have just noticed that booting installation media for
> FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE AMD64 from ISO bootonly under VirtualBox 4.2.6
> results in a kernel panic both when ACPI is enabled and disabled in
> the boot dialog screen (seems differe
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:06 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, February 10, 2013 1:16:16 pm CeDeROM wrote:
>> Hey :-) I have just noticed that booting installation media for
>> FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE AMD64 from ISO bootonly under VirtualBox 4.2.6
>> results in a kernel panic both when ACPI is ena
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, CeDeROM wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
>> VBox itself also needs some RAM and the emulated Graphics Card which
>> can easily be 128M per VM.
>
> This is what I get with CP and one VBox running - memory use is not
> that high but
As far as I remember, there is no apic option in amd64 kernel,
because it's always included.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-RELEASE-AMD64-crash-under-VBox-4-2-6-when-IO-APIC-is-disabled-tp5785747p5786129.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:58:41 +0200
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> On 11/2/2013 14:11, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:23:53 +0200
> > Panagiotis Christias wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 on an IBM x3550 M3 server.
> >> In
On Fri, 2013-02-08 at 10:16 -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> For those that may have run across the story on Slashdot about this NIC,
> here is our statement:
>
> Recently there were a few stories published, based on a blog post by an
> end-user, suggesting specific network packets may cause the Intel®
On 02/12/2013 02:59 AM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:43:55AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Panagiotis Christias
wrote:
I suppose trying an 8.3 installation would be the easiest way to use MBR
instead of GPT, right;
That would do it, but
Yes I have added debugging option in my kernel. I have makeoptions DEBUG=-g
in my config. Do I need more ?
I'm not sure to understand what you meant about stray signatures..
--
Demelier David
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
23 matches
Mail list logo
