On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 07:07:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I am glad to read that you found the bug!
> The fix (patch) seems trivial - will it be commited / MFCed? :)
Andrey told me that he was not sure when he would be able to commit
his work, so I have just committed my fix. I am goin
Hi,
We carried few tests under FreeBSD using our LSI HBA after enabling
multipathing. During the test of verifying the fail over, inconsistently we are
observing data corruption while removing the active path. The way we enabled
multipathing and steps that we had followed for the test are as be
Will it be updated after ports? So then, I can just use pkgng :-)
On 2012/09/17 14:07, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Also, the "official" pkgng repositories aren't really in action yet
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 04:14:14 -0500, Pasupathy, Subramani
wrote:
Kindly let us know if there any issues similar to this has been reported
to the community. Or does it look like a fresh and does it really seem
to be potential defect?
I did extensive testing of the new(er) multipath code
On 9/14/2012 11:41 PM, Mike Manilone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using ports with pkgng enabled. But I found that portmaster won't
> work. Is there any way to update ports? Thanks!
>
> Sincerely,
> Mike Manilone
ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel will work with PKGNG out of the box.
Bryan
_
I have patches to add locking to the adv(4), adw(4), aha(4), ahb(4), aic(4),
and bt(4) drivers so that they no longer use Giant. I would appreciate any
testing folks are able to do. The patches are against HEAD but should apply
to 8 or 9. Make sure you have INVARIANTS and INVARIANT_SUPPORT en
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:04:20AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:49:24PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > Is there a specif PR to use for ports that fails with clang and does
> > not specify to use gcc ( > devel/cdecl and deskutils/calibre so were
> > the culprits so far)
TB --- 2012-09-17 19:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-09-17 19:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.2-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4: Wed Sep 28 13:48:49 UTC 2011
mdtan...@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/server amd64
TB --- 2012-09-17 19
On 09/13/12 18:04, Chris Nehren wrote:
> Relevant to my interests, too. I've followed the instructions on the
> wiki / in the handbook (on 9.0/9.1-PRE) and only receive error messages.
> Is DTrace supposed to be working properly on 9.x, or is it still
> experimental?
>From my experience, as long a
On 2012-09-17 21:43, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:04:20AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
...
For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of
our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't
really help us all that much.
Those are b
10 matches
Mail list logo