On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 01:04:20AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:49:24PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > Is there a specif PR to use for ports that fails with clang and does > > not specify to use gcc ( > devel/cdecl and deskutils/calibre so were > > the culprits so far) > > There is no specific PR. We have not yet placed the requirement on our > ports maintainers to deal with clang. > > For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of > our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang" doesn't > really help us all that much.
Those are build failures. What about crashes? E.g. I've recently had crashes with x11-wm/i3 and x11/rxvt-unicode. Both problems disappeared after recompiling them with gcc46. Roland -- R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)
pgpI9WK6wuK68.pgp
Description: PGP signature
