Am 15.01.2012 um 05:20 schrieb Joe Holden:
> Guys
>
> Is a panic **really** appropriate for a filesystem that isn't even in
> fstab?
>
> ie;
> panic: ufs_dirbad: /mnt: bad dir ino 3229 at offset 0: mangled entry
>
> Which happened to be an file-backed md volume that got changed as I forgot
On 15/01/2012, at 18:42, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Most filesystems work under the assumption that they're the sole owner of the
> disk. This means that any changes to the on-disk data must come from
> filesystem code itself; if that data is inconstistent, it must be a bug in
> the filesystem cod
On 15/01/2012 08:12, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Yes, a panic is the correct action here. While I agree that it's super
annoying, the filesystem notices that something is *really* wrong. Instead of
letting the problem fester and continue to corrupt data, it stops the system.
One could argue instea
Actually, that would be a safe assumption especially now that the
installer rightly or wrongly defaults to a single / filesystem, but
perhaps if it could be tunable via mount flags that would be sensible
also...
Thanks,
J
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
>
> On 15/01/2012 08:1
Hi,
I'm trying to boot 9.0-RELEASE on sparc64, but I'm
getting stuck at:
panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3
cpuid = 0
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0xc079841c at ??+0
#1 0xc04ca59c at ??+0
#2 0xc0487f90 at ??+0
#3 0xc0098028 at ??+0
I'm not able to break into the kernel debugger from
th
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 5:02 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to boot 9.0-RELEASE on sparc64, but I'm
> getting stuck at:
>
> panic: kmem_suballoc: bad status return of 3
> cpuid = 0
> KDB: stack backtrace:
> #0 0xc079841c at ??+0
> #1 0xc04ca59c at ??+0
> #2 0xc0487f90 at ??+0
> #3
- Original Message -
From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb"
To: "Steven Hartland"
Cc: "ml-freebsd-stable Stable"
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: HPN-SSH question
On 14. Jan 2012, at 23:56 , Steven Hartland wrote:
On a similar note I'm actually quite concerned by the inclusio
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:37:50 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 02:24:41AM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:15:50 -0500
> > John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:11:10 pm Rob Clark wrote:
> > > > System: Dell 600sc
> > > > Currently
Hi all,
We're trying to implement our puppet infrastructure, and have discovered
something strange about TCP connections between jails on the same host. As our
jails haven't generally been doing a lot of connections between each other,
this issue hasn't popped up before.
We have two 100% equa
On Jan 15, 2012, at 18:44, Eirik Øverby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're trying to implement our puppet infrastructure, and have discovered
> something strange about TCP connections between jails on the same host. As
> our jails haven't generally been doing a lot of connections between each
> other,
Hi all,
We're trying to implement our puppet infrastructure, and have discovered
something strange about TCP connections between jails on the same host. As our
jails haven't generally been doing a lot of connections between each other,
this issue hasn't popped up before.
We have two 100% equa
On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote:
> Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably
> reduced transfer rates on high latency links, exactly the opposite
> as one would expect. I don't have the exact figures I'm afraid as
> we just went straight back to standard
I have a problem with sound in FreeBSD9 stable as a VBOX guest. The
problem happens about 30-45 minutes after boot. While playing a stream
from the web the sound will suddenly stop. I see the following in the log:
Jan 15 16:36:06 BSD9 kernel: pcm0: chn_write(): pcm0:virtual:dsp0.vp0:
play i
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <
bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
> On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> > Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably
> > reduced transfer rates on high latency links, exactly the opposite
> > as one
On 16. Jan 2012, at 04:56 , Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <
> bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote:
>
>> On 15. Jan 2012, at 16:28 , Steven Hartland wrote:
>>
>>> Yep we installed openssh-portable + HPN and experienced noticeably
>>> reduced transfer r
15 matches
Mail list logo
