It seems something broke with the battery display. Last night it
showed 94% remaining capacity for more than 2 hours.
Afterwards I docked the machine (HP6510b) and rebooted it. Since then
more than 8 hours have passed, but it still shows 16% (the LED indicators
state that the battery is full and
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:11:43AM +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> > Real time scheduler changing would be insane! I was thinking that
> > both/any/all schedulers could be compiled into the kernel, and the
> > choice of which one to use becomes a bo
Am 16.12.2011 09:11, schrieb Luigi Rizzo:
> The interesting part is probably the definition of the methods that
> schedulers should implement (see struct _sched_interface ).
>
> The switch from one scheduler to another was implemented with a
> sysctl. This calls the sched_move() method of the curr
2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
>>
> it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is
> usin
2011/12/15 Steve Kargl :
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:25:51PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> I basically went through all the e-mail you just sent and identified 4
>> real report on which we could work on and summarizied in the attached
>> Excel file.
>> I'd like that George, Steve, Doug, Andrey a
Am 16.12.2011 08:06, schrieb O. Hartmann:
> For the underlying OS, as far as I know, the compiler hasn't as much
> impact as on userland software since autovectorization and other neat
> things are not used during system build.
>
> From my experience using gcc 4.2 or 4.4/4.5 does not have an impac
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:46:35AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 16.12.2011 09:11, schrieb Luigi Rizzo:
> > The interesting part is probably the definition of the methods that
> > schedulers should implement (see struct _sched_interface ).
> >
> > The switch from one scheduler to another was imp
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> It seems something broke with the battery display. Last night it
> showed 94% remaining capacity for more than 2 hours.
>
> Afterwards I docked the machine (HP6510b) and rebooted it. Since then
> more than 8 hours have passed, but it still shows 16
Hi,
[resend on the ml, my bad]
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>>>
>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_ite
Can someone please write up a nice, concise blog post somewhere
outlining all of this?
Extra bonus points if it's a blog that is picked up by
blogs.freebsdish.org and/or some of the other BSD sites.
Guys/girls/fuzzy things - this is 2011; people look at shiny blog
sites with graphs rather than ma
Some others have problem with HP laptop and freebsd battery indicator.
kern/162859: [acpi] ACPI battery/acline monitoring partialy working (switching)
On 12/16/11, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > It seems something broke with the battery display. Last night i
freebsd-stable@,
I'm building Samba using net/samba36 with the following config:
LDAP=on "With LDAP support"
ADS=on "With Active Directory support"
CUPS=off "With CUPS printing support"
WINBIND=on "With WinBIND support"
SWAT=off "With SWAT WebGUI"
ACL_SUPPORT=on "With
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:51:09PM -0600, Shaun Meyer wrote:
> freebsd-stable@,
>
> I'm building Samba using net/samba36 with the following config:
> LDAP=on "With LDAP support"
> ADS=on "With Active Directory support"
> CUPS=off "With CUPS printing support"
> WINBIND=on "With
Hi all,
Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting?
That may be an acceptable solution for now.
Adrian
___
freebsd-
On 12/16/2011 12:53, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
>
> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
> boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting?
>
> That may be an acceptable solution for now.
That, o
Adrian Chadd said:
> Hi all,
>
> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
>
> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
> boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting?
>
> That may be an acceptable solution for now.
As Luigi explained, the pro
O Hartmann says:
> For the underlying OS, as far as I know, the compiler hasn't as much
> impact as on userland software since autovectorization and other neat
> things are not used during system build.
>
> From my experience using gcc 4.2 or 4.4/4.5 does not have an impact
> beyond 3% when SSE
On 12/16/2011 13:40, Michel Talon wrote:
> Adrian Chadd said:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
>>
>> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
>> boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting?
>>
>> That may be an a
Le 16 déc. 2011 à 22:51, Doug Barton a écrit :
> On 12/16/2011 13:40, Michel Talon wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd said:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
>>>
>>> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
>>> boot-time, so th
On 12/16/2011 14:16, Michel Talon wrote:
> Of course, you are perfectly right., and i had misunderstood Adrian's
> post.
Happens to the best of us. :)
> But if the problem is only to change scheduler by rebooting, i think
> it is no more expensive to compile a kernel with the other scheduler.
>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:51:26PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 13:40, Michel Talon wrote:
> > Adrian Chadd said:
> >
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
> >>
> >> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
(This was originally posted to freebsd-hackers, I'm reposting following
email suggestions.)
We've observed a panic in FreeBSD 7 (7.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD) several
times that we've not been able to track down. Upgrading is not an
option at this time.
Does this look at all familiar to anyone?
On 12/16/2011 14:59, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> It really looks much easier than i thought initially.
Awesome!
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
On 12/03/2011 07:24, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Every time I run mergemaster(8) on 7.4-STABLE, I'm now presented
> with
>
> *** There is no /var/db/zoneinfo file to update /etc/localtime.
> You should run tzsetup
>
> Running tzsetup(8) does however not create /var/db/zoneinfo, so
> mergema
24 matches
Mail list logo
