TB --- 2011-07-26 06:15:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-07-26 06:15:19 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-07-26 06:15:19 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-07-26 06:15:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-07-26 06:15:33 - /usr/bi
Le 25/07/2011 11:59, Kostik Belousov a ?crit:
Ok the patched server crashed this morning strangely : all httpd processes were
stuck in nfs or vmopar
and were unkillable. Below is the full ps.
When tried to reboot it got stuck after "All buffers synced" with LOR :
lock order reversal:
1st 0xff
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49:13AM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> Le 25/07/2011 11:59, Kostik Belousov a Иcrit:
>
> Ok the patched server crashed this morning strangely : all httpd processes
> were stuck in nfs or vmopar
> and were unkillable. Below is the full ps.
Please see the
http://www.fre
Le 26/07/2011 12:06, Kostik Belousov a ?crit:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49:13AM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> > Le 25/07/2011 11:59, Kostik Belousov a ?crit:
> >
> > Ok the patched server crashed this morning strangely : all httpd processes
> > were stuck in nfs or vmopar
> > and were unkil
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:17:52PM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> Le 26/07/2011 12:06, Kostik Belousov a Иcrit:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49:13AM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> > > Le 25/07/2011 11:59, Kostik Belousov a ?crit:
> > >
> > > Ok the patched server crashed this morning strangely
Hi!
> > What kind of SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller is currently suggested
> > for use in 8/9 setups with large RAM (64G) setups with ZFS ?
> SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i
>
> PCIe controller with 2 multi-lane connectors (SFF-1087) supporting 8
> SAS/SATA ports. Supports two firmwares:
> IR mo
I installed FreeBSD from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/201105/FreeBSD-8.2-STABLE-201105-amd64-memstick.img
cvsup with latest sources
In make.conf set CPUTYPE?=nocona
make buildworld pass without any errors
make installworld print me this messages:
===> sys/boot/i386/boot2 (inst
On 2011-07-26 12:09, Mitya wrote:
...
make buildworld pass without any errors
make installworld print me this messages:
...
btxld:No such file or directory
This is usually due to the system clock being off, or the object tree
being modified after building. Most of the time, you can fix it b
on 25/07/2011 21:55 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> powernow expects a static table
> (via acpi_perf) but _PSS is dynamically constructed at runtime. I
> don't think we can support this case easily, sorry.
Just a side note.
Actually I do not see anything wrong with that _PSS except that ASL
on 26/07/2011 04:20 maestro something said the following:
> Hi,
>
> when using the ustack action on the latest FreeBSD8.2 i386 the kernel
> panics.
>
> Here is the information I could gather:
>
> let me know if I can provide more information. (i.e., i have the full crash
> information 80+mbs han
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to rebuild world, but without
upgrading or even compiling the kernel.
The problem is such : I am presently working on a FreeBSD station that
seems to have quite a lot of problem, notably with fsck. I am starting
to wonder whether this BSD station
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:04:04PM +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
> I would like to know if it is possible to rebuild world, but without
> upgrading or even compiling the kernel.
>
> The problem is such : I am presently working on a FreeBSD station
> that seems to have quite a lot of problem, notably
On 2011-07-26 13:04, Jerome Herman wrote:
I would like to know if it is possible to rebuild world, but without
upgrading or even compiling the kernel.
The problem is such : I am presently working on a FreeBSD station that
seems to have quite a lot of problem, notably with fsck. I am starting
to
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:04 +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if it is possible to rebuild world, but without
> upgrading or even compiling the kernel.
>
> The problem is such : I am presently working on a FreeBSD station that
> seems to have quite a lot of problem,
On 26/07/2011 13:44, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:04:04PM +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
I would like to know if it is possible to rebuild world, but without
upgrading or even compiling the kernel.
The problem is such : I am presently working on a FreeBSD station
that seems to
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
> [very large snip]
>
> So here I am starting to think that my disklabel and fsck are not in
> sync with my kernel.
I've never heard of either of these utilities (bsdlabel/disklabel, nor
fsck) having to be "in sync with the kernel". M
On 26/07/2011 15:16, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
[very large snip]
So here I am starting to think that my disklabel and fsck are not in
sync with my kernel.
I've never heard of either of these utilities (bsdlabel/disklabel, nor
fsck) ha
On 26/07/2011 13:58, Michal Varga wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:04 +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to rebuild world, but without
upgrading or even compiling the kernel.
The problem is such : I am presently working on a FreeBSD station that
seems to h
On 26/07/2011 15:01, Lars Eighner wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Jerome Herman wrote:
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to rebuild world, but without
upgrading or even compiling the kernel.
The problem is such : I am presently working on a FreeBSD station
that seems to have quite
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 04:25:38PM +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
> On 26/07/2011 15:16, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:50:28PM +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
> >>[very large snip]
> >>
> >>So here I am starting to think that my disklabel and fsck are not in
> >>sync with my kernel.
On Jul 26, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Jerome Herman wrote:
> Actually it is Raid 10 of a sort. Three first halves of the three disk
> concatenated and mirrored on the three second half of the same drives.
There's a significant problem right there. Not only will that configuration
badly degrade the perfo
On 26/07/2011 16:58, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 26, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Jerome Herman wrote:
Actually it is Raid 10 of a sort. Three first halves of the three disk
concatenated and mirrored on the three second half of the same drives.
There's a significant problem right there. Not only will tha
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 16:28 +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
> > PS: Whatever that means, please don't get your sources through
> > "sysinstall", that monster shouldn't even be present in a seriously
> > maintained FreeBSD installation. Get your sources "the proper way" with
> > csup:
> >
> > http://ww
On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Jerome Herman wrote:
> On 26/07/2011 16:58, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> On Jul 26, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Jerome Herman wrote:
>>> Actually it is Raid 10 of a sort. Three first halves of the three disk
>>> concatenated and mirrored on the three second half of the same drives.
>>
On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Michal Varga wrote:
> Well, that depends. Probably every single time I've seen someone
> touching sysinstal in a post-install environment, that OS was instantly
> rendered as much as good for a complete reinstall. It's just "one of
> those things" that shouldn't be pres
On 26/07/2011 17:19, Michal Varga wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 16:28 +0200, Jerome Herman wrote:
PS: Whatever that means, please don't get your sources through
"sysinstall", that monster shouldn't even be present in a seriously
maintained FreeBSD installation. Get your sources "the proper way"
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:34 -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Michal Varga wrote:
> > Well, that depends. Probably every single time I've seen someone
> > touching sysinstal in a post-install environment, that OS was instantly
> > rendered as much as good for a complete rein
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Michal Varga wrote:
> > Well, that depends. Probably every single time I've seen someone
> > touching sysinstal in a post-install environment, that OS was instantly
> > rendered as much as good for a complete reinstall. It'
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:09:25PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > What kind of SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller is currently suggested
> > > for use in 8/9 setups with large RAM (64G) setups with ZFS ?
>
> > SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i
> >
> > PCIe controller with 2 multi-lane connectors
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:42:07PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> > What kind of SATA 6g 4-port non-RAID controller is currently suggested
> > for use in 8/9 setups with large RAM (64G) setups with ZFS ?
> >
>
> SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i
>
>
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:17:52PM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> > Le 26/07/2011 12:06, Kostik Belousov a Иcrit:
> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:49:13AM +0200, Herve Boulouis wrote:
> > > > Le 25/07/2011 11:59, Kostik Belousov a ?crit:
> > > >
> > > > Ok the patched serve
31 matches
Mail list logo
