RE: 8.1-STABLE: zfs and sendfile: problem still exists

2010-10-31 Thread Alexander Zagrebin
> >> I apologize for my haste, it should have been VM_ALLOC_WIRED. > > > > Ok, applied and tested under some load(~1200 active > connections, outgoing > > ~80MB/s). Patch work as expected and i has noted no side > effects. Just one > > question - should grow Active memory counter, if some pages

Re: 8.1-STABLE: zfs and sendfile: problem still exists

2010-10-31 Thread Ronald Klop
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:02:44 +0100, Alexander Zagrebin wrote: >> I apologize for my haste, it should have been VM_ALLOC_WIRED. > > Ok, applied and tested under some load(~1200 active connections, outgoing > ~80MB/s). Patch work as expected and i has noted no side effects. Just one > question

option DDB broken between r214547 - r214596

2010-10-31 Thread David Wolfskill
On one of my machines, I've been having some issues such that I adjusted the kernel config to include some debugging options: options KDB options KDB_TRACE options KDB_UNATTENDED options DDB options DDB_NUMSYM options GDB options DEBUG_REDZON

Re: option DDB broken between r214547 - r214596

2010-10-31 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, David Wolfskill wrote: Hi, On one of my machines, I've been having some issues such that I adjusted the kernel config to include some debugging options: options KDB options KDB_TRACE options KDB_UNATTENDED options DDB options DDB_NUM

Re: option DDB broken between r214547 - r214596

2010-10-31 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: Hi David, Now, I actually build for the system in question on my build machine (which builds a GENERIC kernel for itself, as well as kernels for the above-mentioned machine and another). This morning, it was running FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE r214547, buildin

Re: option DDB broken between r214547 - r214596

2010-10-31 Thread David Wolfskill
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 04:57:42PM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >... > ... > >>/usr/src/sys/net/if_debug.c > >>/usr/src/sys/net/if_debug.c: In function 'if_show_ifnet': > >>/usr/src/sys/net/if_debug.c:65: error: 'struct ifnet' has no member named > >>'if_index_reserved' > >>*** Error code 1 > > >

Re: Degraded zpool cannot detach old/bad drive

2010-10-31 Thread Rumen Telbizov
Hi Artem, everyone, Here's the latest update on my case. I did upgrade the system to the latest stable: 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sun Oct 31 11:44:06 PDT 2010 After that I did zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade -r all the filesystems. Currently I am running zpool 15 and zfs 4. Everything went f

HEADS UP: FreeBSD 6.4 and 8.0 EoLs coming soon

2010-10-31 Thread Colin Percival
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, On November 30th, FreeBSD 6.4 and FreeBSD 8.0 will have reached their End of Life and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team. Since FreeBSD 6.4 is the last remaining supported release from the FreeBSD 6.x stable branc