Hello,
I'm having a panic with the latest kernel build of my -Stable file server
(sources cvsupped around yesterday evening, CEST). The panic happens soon
after entering multi-user :
panic: vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page: paddr 0xf is not in any segment
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 1005 tid 1001
Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hello,
I'm having a panic with the latest kernel build of my -Stable file server
(sources cvsupped around yesterday evening, CEST). The panic happens soon
after entering multi-user :
panic: vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page: paddr 0xf is not in any segment
KDB: enter: pani
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 11:02:39AM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having a panic with the latest kernel build of my -Stable file server
> (sources cvsupped around yesterday evening, CEST). The panic happens soon
> after entering multi-user :
>
> panic: vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page:
Hi,
I have installed FreeBSD 7.2 on an old laptop. It's only for fun and
learning.
I wanted to make my console use full 1024x768, so I followed this howto:
http://kimklai.blogspot.com/2007/05/howto-freebsd-console-framebuffer.html
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERICVESA
Gives me after quite lon
Mikael Bak wrote:
> -options SMP
> -device apic
> -device eisa
>
Responding to myself.
I reactivated the above options, and now I get a different error:
/usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx.c:7896: internal compiler error: in
output_constructor, at varasm.c:4311
[snip]
*** Error code 1
I installed
Le Sunday 06 September 2009, Kostik Belousov a écrit :
>
> I expect that the following patch, that is the partial merge of r194459,
> would fix it. It patches sys/vm/vm_phys.c.
>
> Index: vm_phys.c
> ===
> --- vm_phys.c (revision 19445
(this problem seems to affect both current and -stable,
so let's see if here i have better luck)
I just noticed [Note 1,2] that when setting HZ > 2500 (even if it is
an exact divisor of the APIC/CPU clock) there is a significant
drift between the delays generated by usleep()/select() and those
com
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:37:52PM +0200, A.J. Fonz van Werven wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > I expect that the following patch, that is the partial merge of r194459,
> > would fix it. It patches sys/vm/vm_phys.c.
> >
> > Index: vm_phys.c
> > ===
First got this on my laptop (but not my headless build machine) --
each of which is i386 -- yesterday, at r196858; after reverting to
r196827 (from Thursday), then rebuilding stable/7 at r196886, it
recurred.
It appears to be happening when xdm(1) gets started., which is pretty
late in the transit
Le Sunday 06 September 2009, A.J. "Fonz" van Werven a écrit :
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > I expect that the following patch, that is the partial merge of r194459,
> > would fix it. It patches sys/vm/vm_phys.c.
> >
> > Index: vm_phys.c
> > ===
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 08:44:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> First got this on my laptop (but not my headless build machine) --
> each of which is i386 -- yesterday, at r196858; after reverting to
> r196827 (from Thursday), then rebuilding stable/7 at r196886, it
> recurred.
Please try r19689
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> I expect that the following patch, that is the partial merge of r194459,
> would fix it. It patches sys/vm/vm_phys.c.
>
> Index: vm_phys.c
> ===
> --- vm_phys.c (revision 194458)
> +++ vm_phys.c (revision 194
David Wolfskill wrote:
> It appears to be happening when xdm(1) gets started.
I'm getting the same when starting X manually (startx).
> I welcome clues.
A patch has been submitted to this list less than an hour ago and I've
already seen the SVN commit as well. I'm currently rebuilding, you migh
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:09:55PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 08:44:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > First got this on my laptop (but not my headless build machine) --
> > each of which is i386 -- yesterday, at r196858; after reverting to
> > r196827 (from Thursda
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:00:26AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 07:09:55PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 08:44:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > > First got this on my laptop (but not my headless build machine) --
> > > each of which is i3
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> (this problem seems to affect both current and -stable,
> so let's see if here i have better luck)
>
> I just noticed [Note 1,2] that when setting HZ > 2500 (even if it is
> an exact divisor of the APIC/CPU clock) there is a significant
> drift b
16 matches
Mail list logo