Kostik Belousov wrote:
> I expect that the following patch, that is the partial merge of r194459,
> would fix it. It patches sys/vm/vm_phys.c.
>
> Index: vm_phys.c
> ===================================================================
> --- vm_phys.c (revision 194458)
> +++ vm_phys.c (revision 194459)
> @@ -382,8 +382,7 @@
> if (pa >= seg->start && pa < seg->end)
> return (&seg->first_page[atop(pa - seg->start)]);
> }
> - panic("vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page: paddr %#jx is not in any segment",
> - (uintmax_t)pa);
> + return (NULL);
> }
>
> /*
Hi,
A quick grep on the file in question revealed that there are two
functions that may panic() with "page not in any segment": the
vm_phys_paddr_to_vm_page() being patched and also the next function
vm_phys_paddr_to_segind(). I'm not exactly current with the memory
management code so this may be a very stupid question, but I'll ask it
anyway: don't both functions need to be patched?
My apologies if I'm way off the mark here, but I'm just trying to help.
Regards,
Alphons
--
All right, that does it Bill [Donahue]. I'm pretty sure that killing
Jesus is not very Christian.
-- Pope Benedict XVI, Southpark season 11 episode 5
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
