I am wondering if the numbers I am seeing is something expected or is
something broken somewhere. Output of bonnie -s 1024:
on UFS2 + SoftUpdates:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- -
Hi--
On Jun 16, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Andrew Reilly wrote:
I bought a pair of identical WD 750G SATA drives the other day
and was surprised to discover that they were different sizes:
ad4: 715403MB at ata2-master SATA150
ad6: 715404MB at ata3-master SATA150
Luckily for me I built the file system
Hello folks,
I need to upgrade the OpenSSH from the shiped 4.5p1 versions in 6.x and
7.x branches to 4.5p2 or higher(1).
I've updated the source tree in 6.3 and 7.0 RELENG boxes with a system
upgrade in mind, but the version is 4.5p1:
# cat /usr/src/crypto/openssh/version.h | grep -i ssh_ve
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> I need to upgrade the OpenSSH from the shiped 4.5p1 versions in 6.x and
> 7.x branches to 4.5p2 or higher(1).
[...]
> ¿How can I upgrade the OpenSSH in the _same_ RELENG? ¿Maybe using the
> ports?
portsnap fetch update
cd /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/
make ins
* Erik Stian Tefre [2009-06-17 12:34]:
> Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
> > ¿How can I upgrade the OpenSSH in the _same_ RELENG? ¿Maybe using the
> > ports?
>
> portsnap fetch update
> cd /usr/ports/security/openssh-portable/
> make install clean
> /etc/rc.d/sshd stop
> Set sshd_enable="NO" in /etc/
Hi.
This is on 6.4-RELEASE-p5
Early in boot (probably due to network outage)::
Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt.
Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]...
/boot/kernel/acpi.ko text*0x44f40 |
readin failed
elf32*loadimage: read failed
GDB: no debug ports present
and th
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 10:00:49 am Bruce Simpson wrote:
> Vlad Galu wrote:
> > ...
> > Thanks, Ivan. I'll take a better look at this after our first release,
> > which is due in a couple of weeks. Right now the team efforts aren't
> > focused on portability, so it's a low priority issue, but somet
hail,
I have a 8-current using a small zfs pool:
[r...@harry ~]# zpool status
pool: zdados
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zdados ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1ONLINE 0 0 0
ad8
On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use
> VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will
> just work ?
>
> Kip Macy created a branch were there is the new zfs code, but I didn't get
> it if it is
On Wed, June 17, 2009 11:16, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>> And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use
>> VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will
>> just work ?
>>
>> Kip Macy created a branch were
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:03:34PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
> As for allpcpu, I often see the picture, when one CPU runs the "irq17:
> bce1 aacu0" thread
> and another one runs arcconf. I wonder if that might be a source of
> bad locking or races, or..
> The arcconf utility uses ioctl that goes into
2009/6/17 Ed Maste :
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 07:03:34PM +0400, pluknet wrote:
>
>> As for allpcpu, I often see the picture, when one CPU runs the "irq17:
>> bce1 aacu0" thread
>> and another one runs arcconf. I wonder if that might be a source of
>> bad locking or races, or..
>> The arcconf utili
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Wed, June 17, 2009 11:16, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use
VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will
just work ?
Kip Macy created a bra
The difference in layout can easily explain a 2x difference in
sequential transfer performance.
I seriously doubt your disk is really getting 23K seeks/s done in the
UFS case - 100/s sounds much more reasonable for real hardware. Perhaps
the results of caching?
Joe Koberg
Dan Naumov wro
In the last episode (Jun 17), Dan Naumov said:
> I am wondering if the numbers I am seeing is something expected or is
> something broken somewhere. Output of bonnie -s 1024:
>
> on UFS2 + SoftUpdates:
>
> ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input--
> --Random--
>
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:51 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
> > thanks, I was just looking for this update on web interface to cvs and
> > there is nothing in UPDATING for RELENG_7 there. is this really supposed
> > to happen ?
>
> Sadly a known and ignored problem of cvsweb
>
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:51 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
thanks, I was just looking for this update on web interface to cvs and
there is nothing in UPDATING for RELENG_7 there. is this really supposed
to happen ?
Sadly a known and ignored problem of
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:34:02 +0200, Dan Naumov
wrote:
I am wondering if the numbers I am seeing is something expected or is
something broken somewhere. Output of bonnie -s 1024:
on UFS2 + SoftUpdates:
---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
All the ZFS tuning guides for FreeBSD (including one on the FreeBSD
ZFS wiki) have recommended values between 64M and 128M to improve
stability, so that what I went with. How much of my max kmem is it
safe to give to ZFS?
- Dan Naumov
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Isn
19 matches
Mail list logo
