On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:34:02 +0200, Dan Naumov <dan.nau...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am wondering if the numbers I am seeing is something expected or is
something broken somewhere. Output of bonnie -s 1024:
on UFS2 + SoftUpdates:
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
--Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
/sec %CPU
1024 56431 94.5 88407 38.9 77357 53.3 64042 98.6 644511 98.6
23603.8 243.3
on ZFS:
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input--
--Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
--Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
/sec %CPU
1024 22591 53.7 45602 35.1 14770 13.2 45007 83.8 94595 28.0
102.2 1.2
atom# cat /boot/loader.conf
vm.kmem_size="1024M"
vm.kmem_size_max="1024M"
vfs.zfs.arc_max="96M"
Isn't 96M for ARC really small?
Mine is 860M.
vfs.zfs.arc_max: 860072960
kstat.zfs.misc.arcstats.size: 657383376
I think the UFS2 cache is much bigger which makes a difference in your
test.
Ronald.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
