--- Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 27, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Unga wrote:
> > Appreciate if Chuck Swiger could enlighten us
> again on
> > what priority X run on Mac OSX? realtime or
> normal?
>
> The X11 server seems to run with mildly elevated
> priority (46, where
> realtime is
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:15:18AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hello list!
>
>
> When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK:
[...]
> Did I miss something? Thanks!
I discovered the same thing while experimenting with qemu and bridgeng.
I think it simply works diffe
On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:28:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: broken re(4):
PY> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit?
PY> There were similiar reports on this issue. It seems that it's very
PY> hard to make re(4) work so many RTL8168/8169/8111 revisions wi
Guido Falsi ha scritto:
I discovered the same thing while experimenting with qemu and bridgeng.
I think it simply works different from (for example) widnows bridging.
I think it's meant to be like that.
It also looks more logical either. I think of the bridge as just a
packet router, which ro
On Wednesday 28 May 2008 01:15:18 Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hello list!
>
>
> When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK:
> -
> bs1% uname -a
> FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25
> 20:15:26 MSD 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/s
On Wed, 28 May 2008 09:28:23 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
about Re: broken re(4):
PY> > Any hints what I should do next to find the culprit?
PY> There were similiar reports on this issue. It seems that it's very
PY> hard to make re(4) work so many RTL8168/8169/8111 revisions w
Hello,
i have configured lagg interface on two Broacom (bce0 bce1).
I have tried with laggproto lacp (supported by the Nortel switch), with fce
and failover, but they all shows the same symptom:
Everything works fine until i unplug the cable of the first interface
(bce0), it will
show status: n
Hello,
my buildworld on a 7-stable-amd64 blocks on the following line :
TERM=dumb TERMCAP=dumb: ex - /files/bsd/src7/share/termcap/termcap.src <
/files/bsd/src7/share/termcap/reorder
ex(1) stays in lockd state, and is unkillable, either by Ctl-C or
kill -9
/files/bsd is nfs-mounted as follows
On 28 May 2008, at 20:57, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hello,
my buildworld on a 7-stable-amd64 blocks on the following line :
TERM=dumb TERMCAP=dumb: ex - /files/bsd/src7/share/termcap/
termcap.src < /files/bsd/src7/share/termcap/reorder
ex(1) stays in lockd state, and is unkillable, either b
I have a rather busy Apache 2.2 server; tons of small & some large
requests. It's a standard Dell 2650 server using the bge (broadcom)
network driver.
I seem to have a rather strange problem where after just a day or so
Apache just stops processing new connections. You can connect to port
Hi--
You didn't mention which version of FreeBSD you are running-- that's
rather important info.
On May 28, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
ipfw:
00200 allow tcp from any to me 80 setup
00200 allow icmp from any to me icmptype 0,3,8,11
00200 deny log ip from any to me
Also, surely
On May 28, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
You didn't mention which version of FreeBSD you are running-- that's
rather important info.
Actually, I just checked, this is a 4.11 server, I thought it was
running at least 6.2.
00200 allow tcp from any to me 80 setup
00200 allow icmp fro
On May 28, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
That's a known problem with FreeBSD 4, which is now well past EOL. I
would suggest moving to FreeBSD 7 ASAP.
Is it? I searched and searched and never found any hits or PR's
regarding this. When was it first fixed? 5.x? 6.x? or not until
Robert Blayzor wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
You didn't mention which version of FreeBSD you are running-- that's
rather important info.
Actually, I just checked, this is a 4.11 server, I thought it was
running at least 6.2.
That's a known problem with FreeBSD 4, w
Robert Blayzor wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
That's a known problem with FreeBSD 4, which is now well past EOL. I
would suggest moving to FreeBSD 7 ASAP.
Is it? I searched and searched and never found any hits or PR's
regarding this.
Not sure where you looked th
Doug Barton wrote:
Robert Blayzor wrote:
On May 28, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
That's a known problem with FreeBSD 4, which is now well past EOL. I
would suggest moving to FreeBSD 7 ASAP.
Is it? I searched and searched and never found any hits or PR's
regarding this.
Not sure
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
The Apache page:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.3/misc/perf-tuning.html
It mentions FIN_WAIT_2 not 1, so this might be a different/new problem.
IIRC it actually is the same problem, but in any case you're missing
the bit where 4.x is EOL. :) Hence m
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 06:13:04PM -0400, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> Here is what I have on the server now:
>
> and loader.conf
>
> accf_http_load="YES"
You shouldn't bother with this. Let the apache22 rc.d script handle
loading it dynamically. Use apache22_http_accept_enable="yes" in
rc.conf.
I'v
18 matches
Mail list logo
