On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:15:18AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Hello list! > > > When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK: [...] > Did I miss something? Thanks!
I discovered the same thing while experimenting with qemu and bridgeng. I think it simply works different from (for example) widnows bridging. I think it's meant to be like that. It also looks more logical either. I think of the bridge as just a packet router, which routes them to all the interfaces(physical and virtual as well) so if the bridge intercepts them with it's own address they can't ereach other interfaces, obviosusly. Maybe I'm wrong here? -- Guido Falsi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
