Hi,
I recently replaced an old DDS-II Tape with a not so old AIT-Tape in one
of my FBSD-Boxes. However, access via RMT is really slow :-(
When I perform a local dump of the machines that hosts the drive I get 4
- 6MB/s throughput. I get roughly the same speed, when I move the Tape
to one of
Hi Hans,
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, 08:38+0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 09 November 2006 18:29, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > [ iedowse CC'ed ]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, 5 May 2006, 11:04-0400, David Coder wrote:
> > > thx for the suggestions, guys. with
> > >
> > > device uftdi
>
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:31:59 -0800 (PST) Minette Pamela wrote:
> hi, i got this problem with linux-firefox. I Installed it before in my
> KDE in FreeBSD with no problems and been able to use flash
> plugins. Then, I changed to Gnome recently and installed
> linux-firefox. Now, when I tried to insta
On Friday 10 November 2006 03:45, Robert Marella wrote:
> Aloha All
>
> One of my computers has an Asus A8N-VM motherboard. I have been running
> i386 on it for nearly a year. I played around with AMD64 earlier stuck
> with the i386.
>
> Last week I set up a dual boot with i386 and AMD64. The i386
SNIP
> >(FreeBSD 4.x) : cd /usr; tar clpf - . | (cd /mnt; tar xvf -)
> >(FreeBSD 5.x+) : cd /usr; gtar clpf - . | (cd /mnt; gtar xvf -)
> iirc tar(1) has changed in 5.3. why do you use gtar please? is new tar
> missing something?
Well, technically no, but it requires more typing.
gtar su
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Vlad Galu wrote:
-- cut here --
lock order reversal:
1st 0x80501ba0 cdev (cdev) @ kern/kern_conf.c:61
2nd 0x858d20f8 sleep mtxpool (sleep mtxpool) @ kern/kern_prot.c:1877
isn't that http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#187 ?
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
Install flash plugin from the port. "cd /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin7
& make install".
In firefox options change the default download directory to where you can
write.
HTH,-vlado
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Minette Pamela wrote:
hi, i got this problem with linux-firefox. I Installed it
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Minette Pamela wrote:
Ppass on Q1 .. what Vladimir said.
> Now, maybe is somehow related to the errors I always get when I try
> to download files or open files from the linux-firefox browser like :
> "/tmp/, could not be saved, because you cannot change the
> contents of
Hi All,
I have a bit of a wierd problem, My laptop has no serial ports, as is
the norm these days, so i have a FTDI based usb serial connector which
is very handy and works well. However, what i have found is that freebsd
still detects a serial port anyway
sio0: configured irq 4 not in bit
At 07:17 AM 11/10/2006, Vince wrote:
Hi All,
I have a bit of a wierd problem, My laptop has no serial ports, as is
the norm these days, so i have a FTDI based usb serial connector which
is very handy and works well. However, what i have found is that freebsd
still detects a serial port an
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Vince wrote:
> I have a bit of a wierd problem, My laptop has no serial ports, as is
> the norm these days, so i have a FTDI based usb serial connector which
> is very handy and works well. However, what i have found is that freebsd
> still detects a serial port anywa
Aaron Burke wrote:
> SNIP
> > >(FreeBSD 4.x) : cd /usr; tar clpf - . | (cd /mnt; tar xvf -)
> > >(FreeBSD 5.x+) : cd /usr; gtar clpf - . | (cd /mnt; gtar xvf -)
> > iirc tar(1) has changed in 5.3. why do you use gtar please? is new tar
> > missing something?
> Well, technically no,
On Friday 10 November 2006 10:08, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, 08:38+0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 November 2006 18:29, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > > [ iedowse CC'ed ]
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 5 May 2006, 11:04-0400, David Coder wrote
[...]
> > The second question: is it OK to commit uark(4) as is and then convert
> > it to the new model?
>
> I would prefer no. It is better to commit "uark(4)" to the USB p4 project,
> than HEAD, because then we don't have to worry about integrating the driver.
>
> I looked at your uark.diff, and
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hans Petter Selasky writes:
>On Friday 10 November 2006 10:08, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>> The second question: is it OK to commit uark(4) as is and then convert
>> it to the new model?
>
>I would prefer no. It is better to commit "uark(4)" to the USB p4 project,
>than
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, 11:09-, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hans Petter Selasky writes:
> >On Friday 10 November 2006 10:08, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >> The second question: is it OK to commit uark(4) as is and then convert
> >> it to the new model?
> >
> >I would prefer no
Ian Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Vince wrote:
>
> >I have a bit of a wierd problem, My laptop has no serial ports, as is
> > the norm these days, so i have a FTDI based usb serial connector which
> > is very handy and works well. However, what i have found is that freebsd
> > still
Hello Barry,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:56:30AM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
B>I see you listed on the EM stability issues list. I have a Tyan
B> H1000S with dual em ports on 6.1, and it won't stay up 5 minutes
B> without EM watchdog resets unless I use giant locks.
B>Is there any way you'd
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:48:40 +0200
Andrei Kolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 10 November 2006 03:45, Robert Marella wrote:
> > Aloha All
> >
> > One of my computers has an Asus A8N-VM motherboard. I have been
> > running i386 on it for nearly a year. I played around with AMD64
> > earlier
On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Robert Marella wrote:
Thank you for your response. It seems unlikely that it is the power
supply because I can buildworld on the same machine with an i386
install. The only difference is the i386 is on a SATA drive while the
AMD64 is on an IDE drive.
The funny th
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:33:44 -0500
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Robert Marella wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your response. It seems unlikely that it is the power
> > supply because I can buildworld on the same machine with an i386
> > install. The only d
I have just built a new SunFire X4100 server with an Adaptec 2230SLP
RAID card using FreeBSD 6.2-PRE kernel (from September 20).
Everything is working extremely well except I cannot run the aaccli
utility on this controller. When I try to open the controller, it
gives this error:
Command
on 10/11/2006 14:32 Oliver Fromme said the following:
> Aaron Burke wrote:
> > SNIP
> > > >(FreeBSD 4.x) : cd /usr; tar clpf - . | (cd /mnt; tar xvf -)
> > > >(FreeBSD 5.x+) : cd /usr; gtar clpf - . | (cd /mnt; gtar xvf -)
> > > iirc tar(1) has changed in 5.3. why do you use gtar plea
So far so good. I updated to the latest, including jfv's revision
1.65.2.21 from this AM.
With the 6.1 ISO distribution, I would get watchdogs within seconds of
starting a file transfer (except giant locked which worked fine).
With RELENG_6 I've transfered 100's of GB via ftp and NFS over both
The machine in question has a 2-core Xeon, 2GB RAM and a new
ciss-compatible controller, for which I appologise for not remembering
the exact model but it's "200-something" with three attached 7.2k RPM
SATA drives (so it's probably SAS-compatible) in RAID5, and 128 MB cache
with BBU. I'm trying to
At 05:00 PM 11/9/2006, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 10:51 AM 11/9/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:19 PM 11/8/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
BUT, I've added the FAST_INTR changes back into the code, so
if you go into your Makefile and add -DEM_FAST_INTR you will
then get the taskqueue stuff
I have set CPUTYPE=p3 in make.conf. When I compile my kernel I see
-march=pentium3 as I expect. I also see -mno-mmx and -mno-sse are set
which I do not expect given that -march=pentium3 is used. I presume
that I want MMX and SSE since my processor supports it. What options do
I set and wher
On 11/10/06, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some more tests. I tried again with what was committed to today's
RELENG_6. I am guessing its pretty well the same patch. Polling is
the only way to avoid livelock at a high pps rate. Does anyone know
of any simple tools to measure end to end
>From /usr/src/sys/conf/kern.mk:
# On the i386, do not align the stack to 16-byte boundaries. Otherwise GCC
# 2.95 adds code to the entry and exit point of every function to align the
# stack to 16-byte boundaries -- thus wasting approximately 12 bytes of
stack
# per function call. While the 16-
Jason C. Wells wrote:
I have set CPUTYPE=p3 in make.conf. When I compile my kernel I see
-march=pentium3 as I expect. I also see -mno-mmx and -mno-sse are set
which I do not expect given that -march=pentium3 is used. I presume
that I want MMX and SSE since my processor supports it. What opt
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:34:22 -0800
"Jason C. Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have set CPUTYPE=p3 in make.conf. When I compile my kernel I see
> -march=pentium3 as I expect. I also see -mno-mmx and -mno-sse are
> set which I do not expect given that -march=pentium3 is used. I
> presume th
At 05:00 PM 11/10/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 11/10/06, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some more tests. I tried again with what was committed to today's
RELENG_6. I am guessing its pretty well the same patch. Polling is
the only way to avoid livelock at a high pps rate. Does anyone kno
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:34:22AM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> I have set CPUTYPE=p3 in make.conf. When I compile my kernel I see
> -march=pentium3 as I expect. I also see -mno-mmx and -mno-sse are set
> which I do not expect given that -march=pentium3 is used. I presume
> that I want MMX
Luck ran out. Hard "must press the reset button" hang. No console
messages. The system was idle at the time.
Is there anything you'd like me to do to attempt to narrow down the
problem or get debugging output? I do not know if the freeze was
related to em or something else.
-Barry
Barry
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 04:28:30PM -0600, Barry Boes wrote:
B>
B> Luck ran out. Hard "must press the reset button" hang. No console
B> messages. The system was idle at the time.
B>Is there anything you'd like me to do to attempt to narrow down the
B> problem or get debugging output? I do
On 11/10/06, Barry Boes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luck ran out. Hard "must press the reset button" hang. No console
messages. The system was idle at the time.
Is there anything you'd like me to do to attempt to narrow down the
problem or get debugging output? I do not know if the freeze
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:56:54AM -1000, Robert Marella wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:33:44 -0500
> Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Robert Marella wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for your response. It seems unlikely that it is the power
> > > supply b
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Oct 24, 2006, at 12:27 PM, Nguyen Tam Chinh wrote:
The size of your DB is not all that large. There are people running
terabyte DB's under postgres. Our big DB is around 60Gb with hundreds of
millions of rows spread across dozens of tables which a
On Saturday 11 November 2006 08:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The kernel itself _will not_ use any SSE or MMX operations when built.
> This is because these optimisations are known to break the FreeBSD
> kernel. This applies to all i386 architectures, and probably 64-bit
> architectures too (not su
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:19:42 +1030
"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 11 November 2006 08:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > The kernel itself _will not_ use any SSE or MMX operations when
> > built. This is because these optimisations are known to break the
> > FreeBSD kernel.
Sources from today, right before the compile.
I have paused the virtual machine if someone would like me to issue
further db> commands.
Thanks,
Scott
FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Nov 11 02:47:35 UTC 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj.pfSense/usr/src/sys/pfSense_Dev.6
lock order reversal: (
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 05:00 PM 11/10/2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 11/10/06, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some more tests. I tried again with what was committed to today's
RELENG_6. I am guessing its pretty well the same patch. Polling is
the only way to avoid livelock at a high pps ra
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Long" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike Tancsa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "freebsd-net" ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
; "Jack Vogel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At
Whatever that last em commit was, it seems to have made the interrupt
issues better. It still seems high, but it's a lot better than the
2000/s I was getting before.
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 54 0
irq6: fdc0
44 matches
Mail list logo
