On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, 11:09-0000, Ian Dowse wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hans Petter Selasky writes: > >On Friday 10 November 2006 10:08, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > >> The second question: is it OK to commit uark(4) as is and then convert > >> it to the new model? > > > >I would prefer no. It is better to commit "uark(4)" to the USB p4 project, > >than HEAD, because then we don't have to worry about integrating the driver. > > If the driver works, then there should be no need to hold off on > committing it to -CURRENT. Having it in -CURRENT now allows it to > be MFC'd to RELENG_6 sooner. From a quick glance it looks fine to > me, so I'd say just go ahead and commit it Maxim.
Yes, it works. I'd prefer to commit it first and then adopt for a new model too. Thank you both! -- Maxim Konovalov _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
