> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 07:51:41AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:59:00PM +0100, Dominic Bishop wrote:
>> > I am running a RELENG_6 from yesterday on amd64 and the VIA PATA
>> > controller is being detected as GENERIC ATA, from dmesg:
>> >
>> > atapci0: port
>> > 0x1f0-
Hello,
I installed FreeBSD-6.1 on my home PC. After sometime frequently get em0
UP/DOWN message.
After that I upgraded to 6.2-PRERELEASE still exist UP/DOWN problem, but
between two of cycle time longer than before.
I put below original FreeBSD-6.1 /var/log/messages:
==
At 08:09 AM 10/14/2006, Balgansuren Batsukh wrote:
Hello,
I installed FreeBSD-6.1 on my home PC. After sometime frequently get
em0 UP/DOWN message.
There is a patch you can try that might help you at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029224.html
---Mike
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:09 AM 10/14/2006, Balgansuren Batsukh wrote:
Hello,
I installed FreeBSD-6.1 on my home PC. After sometime frequently get
em0 UP/DOWN message.
There is a patch you can try that might help you at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029224.ht
At 10:32 AM 10/14/2006, Scott Long wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 08:09 AM 10/14/2006, Balgansuren Batsukh wrote:
Hello,
I installed FreeBSD-6.1 on my home PC. After sometime frequently
get em0 UP/DOWN message.
There is a patch you can try that might help you at
http://lists.freebsd.org/piperm
Hello,
gk# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 356 0
irq6: fdc0 3 0
irq15: ata1 100 0
irq18: em0 uhci2+ 342734 1
cpu0: timer
Hello Scott,
I found below email:
=
Mike,
I have a new patch that I hope addresses the actual bug, instead of
shuffling the timing. Would you be willing to test it? I can't
guarantee that it's safe for production use yet, though. It seems
to work, but it might set your dog on fire
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006, at 19:32:39 -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I rebooted my machine today and when it came back up and I tried to
> load the snd_emu10k1 kernel module, the machine hung without returning
> to the prompt. I tried waiting 5-10+ minutes and it was totally
> irrecoverabl
RW> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 00:17:20 +0100 (BST)
RW> From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RW> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
RW>
RW> > Perhaps work on 7 should have been delayed until 5 and 6 were able to woo
RW> > people away from 4 -- or at least not leave valid reasons for peop
