On Sun, 2006-May-07 02:48:27 -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Here is the issue ... periodically, for 60-120 secs, my SSH connections
>to servers in both Panama, Central America and Toronto, Canada, will hang
>... seems to be totally random ...
Presumably there are no messages reported...
If t
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
g'day ...
I've recently started having an issue on my desktop that I've been
kinda hounding the cable provider about, but, from their end, they see
absolutely no issues ... so I figured I'd see if there was maybe
something happening within the OS itself ...
Here
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 09:26:51PM +0100, Chris wrote:
> 1 - it does increase stability if the extra time is spent fixing bugs
> and testing the fixes.
This assumes that you can persuade committers to focus on bugfixes instead
of on other things that they consider more fun.
> I happen to think be
I'm trying to install a new server which has a hardware RAID controller.
All I need is a simple working RAID5 setup and this is my first time
doing it in FreeBSD. I noticed that /sbin/sysinstall does not support
configuring the drives through (g)vinum* therefore, I have to normally
partition the "s
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Duane Whitty wrote:
Have you considered it might be an Azureas issue?
That I have, but nice to hear from someone that has experienced similar
... the problems did start *around* the same time ... maybe taking up to
many "slots" due to the connections ...
Hrmmm ... might
/etc/rc.d/pf rcvar - returns YES
my pf doesn`t have any ALTQ use
I will try pf_flags -v
Any other suggestions...
On 5/7/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 07 May 2006 01:59, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> I noticed such a problem:
>
> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
>
> pf_e
Also (if i didn`t mentioned it)..with rc_debug set i can`t see the pf being
checked at all...
in /var/log/messages i have..
May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: inetd_enable is
set to NO.
May 7 12:00:30 tms_slave root: /etc/rc: INFO: checkyesno: hostapd_enable is
set to NO.
Yousef Raffah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to install a new server which has a hardware RAID controller.
Hardware RAID controllers such as amr(4) or twe(4) (I've seen LSI
MegaRAID SCSI 320-1 and 3Ware Escalade 8006-2 LP, the latter is a 2-port
SATA controller and can't do RAID5 for la
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 11:34 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Yousef Raffah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to install a new server which has a hardware RAID controller.
>
> Hardware RAID controllers such as amr(4) or twe(4) (I've seen LSI
> MegaRAID SCSI 320-1 and 3Ware Escalade 8006-
Yousef Raffah wrote:
> The machine is a compaq server with Smart RAID controller
Is the controller recognised by FreeBSD during startup?
If it's a SmartArray 5xxx then the 'ciss' driver is the one you want:
ciss0: port ...
[...]
da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 01:00:56PM +0200, Daniel Eriksson wrote..
> Yousef Raffah wrote:
>
> > The machine is a compaq server with Smart RAID controller
>
> Is the controller recognised by FreeBSD during startup?
>
> If it's a SmartArray 5xxx then the 'ciss' driver is the one you want:
Or the i
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 13:00 +0200, Daniel Eriksson wrote:
> Yousef Raffah wrote:
>
> > The machine is a compaq server with Smart RAID controller
>
> Is the controller recognised by FreeBSD during startup?
>
Yes
> If it's a SmartArray 5xxx then the 'ciss' driver is the one you want:
>
> ciss0:
the include /usr/include/crypto/rijndael.h seems to belong to
src/sys/crypto/rijndael.h
while the one in /usr/lib/libssh.a seems to want
src/crypto/openssh/rijndael.h
unless, ofcource, im wrong :-)
danny
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
>
> I noticed such a problem:
>
> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
>
> pf_enable="YES"
> pflogd_enable="YES"
pf_rules="/etc/pf.conf" # rules definition file for pf
I have also that line
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:49:08PM +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> >> Hello to all,
> >>
> >>
> >> I noticed such a problem:
> >>
> >> I have a 6.1 RC2 and i have in rc.conf
> >>
> >> pf_enable="YES"
> >> pflogd_
Yousef Raffah wrote:
> Why should I define it from the card's BIOS?
Because there are no utilities in FreeBSD to configure the array during
runtime. Your only option is to do it from the BIOS when you boot your
computer.
> Is it done through the system's startup (F9)?
Just boot your server and
My mistake..
Is is actually pflog_enable="YES"
also i checked the /etc/rc.d/pf file permission => 755...
I just don`t know
On 5/7/06, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:49:08PM +0300, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> On 5/7/06, Pertti Kosunen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> KK> > Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into CVS
in the
DM> KK> > last 24-48 hours. Once they've settled for a few weeks, and assuming
they
DM> KK> > don't have complex dependencies, they will get merged to RELENG_6.
D
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
>
> DM> KK> > Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into CVS
> in the
> DM> KK> > last 24-48 hours. Once they've settled for a few weeks, and
> assuming they
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KB> > Alas, it is locked again:
KB> >
KB> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ps axlww | grep snap
KB> > 032 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL??0:04.55
[bufdaemon]
KB> > 035 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL??0:01.11
[s
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:59:33PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> > Alas, it is locked again:
> KB> >
> KB> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ps axlww | grep snap
> KB> > 032 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL??0:04.55
> [bufdaem
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KB> > I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to 7 May.
KB> It would be great to show the patchset. Also note that relevant changes are
KB> not limited to ufs/ffs. For instance, rev. 1.671 of kern/vfs_subr.c is
KB> also impor
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:29:08PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
> KB> > I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to 7
> May.
>
> KB> It would be great to show the patchset. Also note that relevant changes
> are
> KB>
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
KB> > KB> > I'm running RELENG_6 with hand-merged sys/ufs/ffs changes from 1 to
7 May.
KB> >
KB> > KB> It would be great to show the patchset. Also note that relevant
changes are
KB> > KB> not limited to ufs/ffs. For instance, rev. 1.671 of kern/vf
On 07/05/06, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris wrote:
> On 05/05/06, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Make Jakubik wrote:
>>
>> > FreeBSD users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an
>> > influx of new bells and whistles just before the release [...] I fully
On 05/07/06 04:27, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2006, Duane Whitty wrote:
>> Have you considered it might be an Azureas issue?
>
> That I have, but nice to hear from someone that has experienced similar
> ... the problems did start *around* the same time ... maybe taking up to
> many "s
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Jonathan Noack wrote:
On 05/07/06 04:27, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Duane Whitty wrote:
Have you considered it might be an Azureas issue?
That I have, but nice to hear from someone that has experienced similar
... the problems did start *around* the same
Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
>
> I noticed such a problem:
>
> I have a 6.1 RC2
Step one should be to upgrade to the latest 6-stable, and run mergemaster.
> and i have in rc.conf
>
> pf_enable="YES"
> pflogd_enable="YES"
I think you already corrected yourself to say that you hav
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> I know that a lot of
> people are anxiously awaiting 6.1-RELEASE and it's been a *long* release
> cycle...just be patient a little longer...
And for those of you who can't be patient, there is nothing stopping you
from cvsup'ing and building it yourself. :)
Doug
--
Th
On Saturday 06 May 2006 21:17, Sam Leffler wrote:
> A new test snapshot is available at:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/ath_hal-20060506.tgz
>
> This is 0.9.17.0 and is known to work on sparc (tested) and may well
> work on alpha (untested but likely the same issue that broke sparc).
>
> This c
On Sunday 07 May 2006 21:39, JoaoBR wrote:
the former patch was the wrong one, sorry
João
--- if_ath.c.ori Sun May 7 20:38:42 2006
+++ if_ath.c Sun May 7 07:18:07 2006
@@ -293,7 +293,8 @@
if_initname(ifp, device_get_name(sc->sc_dev),
device_get_unit(sc->sc_dev));
- ah = ath_hal_attach(de
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:06:00PM +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote:
> Why should I define it from the card's BIOS? Is it done through the
> system's startup (F9)?
IIRC for most of the Compaq RAID controllers you'll need the Smartstart
CD that came with the server. A couple of the models I think can be
Janet Sullivan wrote:
Mike Jakubik wrote:
arrive at the sacrifice of stability. I think FreeBSD should only be
released when known major bugs are worked out. A known broken release
to me and most new users is useless, lets not release simply for the
sake of numbering.
For me, and many oth
Pyun,
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 04:22:15PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote..
> > On Mar 28, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > and sparc64(SMP) and I never see above errors. The only issue known to
> > > me is occasional w
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
> Pyun,
>
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 04:22:15PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 07:48:46PM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote..
> > > > On Mar 28, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > > > and sparc64(SMP)
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 12:10:46AM -0400, Miles Lubin wrote:
> On Fri, 5 May 2006, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 5 May 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> >>I had a similar event last night, on a P4 on an Asus P4P800. The current
> >>driver is much less prone to this lockup problem than it
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
> Pyun,
>
> ...
> Is this NIC supported by if_sk driver?
>
Hmm, It seems that the NIC is SysKonnect V2.0(SK98XX2) which is
supposed to work with sk(4). Did it ever work with sk(4)?
No, it is new server an
David Nugent wrote:
Janet Sullivan wrote:
No, I don't use quotas. I doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do.
I don't either, but "the majority of FreeBSD users" is a shifting
thing, and very hard to make generalisations about. Once quota was
about shell users, now it's more common for mail s
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:34:34AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> David Nugent wrote:
> >Janet Sullivan wrote:
> >>No, I don't use quotas. I doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do.
> >
> >I don't either, but "the majority of FreeBSD users" is a shifting
> >thing, and very hard to make generalisatio
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:33 -0600, security wrote:
> Daniel Eriksson wrote:
>
> >Yousef Raffah wrote:
> >
> >
> >>How can I have my volumes configured? Is it after the system is being
> >>installed or during installation? Please forgive my newbie
> >>questions :|
> >>
> >>
> >
> >You need t
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 02:25:48PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
> > > Pyun,
> > >
> > > ...
> > > Is this NIC supported by if_sk driver?
> > >
> >
> >Hmm, It seems that the NIC is SysKonnect V2.0(SK98XX2) which
Pyun,
I can not apply the patch cleanly on
http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c
What version of sk driver should I use?
Ganbold
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 02:25:48PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 01:15:54PM +0
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:13:28PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
> Pyun,
>
> I can not apply the patch cleanly on
> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c
> What version of sk driver should I use?
>
The patch was generated against HEAD.
> Ganbold
>
--
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 03:13:28PM +0900, Ganbold wrote:
> Pyun,
>
> I can not apply the patch cleanly on
> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/sk/sk_test2/if_sk.c
> What version of sk driver should I use?
>
The patch was generated against HEAD.
I see, but how
44 matches
Mail list logo
