On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Sun, 7 May 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > DM> KK> > Also, as an FYI, several quota-related snapshot fixes went into CVS > in the > DM> KK> > last 24-48 hours. Once they've settled for a few weeks, and > assuming they > DM> KK> > don't have complex dependencies, they will get merged to RELENG_6. > DM> KK> > Presumably if there is sufficient demand, and they adequately > address the > DM> KK> > reports of deadlocks with quotas+snapshots, they could be merged to > DM> KK> > RELENG_6_1 as an errata update. > DM> KK> > DM> KK> The fixes seem to indeed correct all the deadlocks I was seeing. I > DM> KK> don't have time to produce a 6.x patch now though, but it should be a > DM> KK> simple matter for someone else to do. > DM> > DM> FWIW, for me it is much stabler too, at least in normal load patterns. > I'll > DM> spend a bit of time to stress-test this on our Samba quota-enabled server > DM> during our long weekend (today-to-Tuesday) to catch possible rare races. > > Alas, it is locked again: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ps axlww | grep snap > 0 32 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:04.55 > [bufdaemon] > 0 35 0 0 -4 0 0 8 snaplk DL ?? 0:01.11 > [softdepflush] > 0 45080 45061 0 -4 0 5980 2768 snaplk D ?? 0:00.09 > /usr/local/sbin/smbd -D > 0 46040 46039 0 -4 0 4492 3616 snaplk D+ p1 0:15.04 rsync -av > /ar/winroot/distrib/ /st/winroot/tmp/distrib-temp/ > 1002 46116 726 0 -4 0 1612 1144 snaplk D+ p3 0:00.00 ls -GF > -la /st/.snap/ > > Unfortunately, this was with non-debug kernel. I'm trying to reproduce the > lock > with debug kernel right now, but still with no luck - sometimes machine is > almost hangs but up to now revives 4 or 5 times. > So, you are running CURRENT ? Or did you manually backported changes from CURRENT to 6-STABLE ? Note that none of the relevant commits where MFCed still.
pgpxhX76HOvj6.pgp
Description: PGP signature