Re: FreeBSD 4.9 losing mbufs!!!

2006-04-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Stephen Clark wrote: I have discovered that if I disable quaqqa/ospfd then I don't lose mbufs! This makes it appear that the mbuf leak is in the multicast routing logic. In fact I lose mbufs even with the both system basically idle but with a 100 vpn/gre with multicast goi

Re: 6.1RC system nearly freezing

2006-04-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Henri Hennebert wrote: I upgrade a web, squid, mail server (under SMP with 2 pentium III) to 6.1-RC (Apr 9 2006) and encounter 2 `freezing'. The system is still responding to http requests but I can't login on the console or through ssh -- no shell prompt. No more mail d

Re: FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE (April 5, 2006) randomly rebooting on Dell Poweredge 650

2006-04-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Matt Watson wrote: I'm not sure if this is the right place to be sending this or not but I figured I'd give it a shot. This (freebsd-stable) is a good place to send the message. Do you have a serial console on the box? If not, could you try putting one on there? Some k

Re: 6.1 prerelease graid3 livelock?

2006-04-24 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 12:04:33PM -0700, Bradley W. Dutton wrote: +> Hi, +> +> I'm experiencing a sort of livelock on a 6.1 prerelease box. It appears +> all of the IO related activity hangs but the box continues to do +> routing/NAT/etc for internet access from my other boxes. I can usually +>

HP DL145G2 SCSC Raid Controlle Q

2006-04-24 Thread Thomas Krause
Hello, I hope, this question is not off topic for this list. In the HP config tool for the DL145 I can select a HP PL100 SCSI RAID Controller (PN 355671-B21) Does this controller work with FreeBSD? I'm not sure, if this is a relabled LSI controller. Kind regards, Thomas. _

Re: FreeBSD 4.9 losing mbufs!!!

2006-04-24 Thread Stephen Clark
Robert Watson wrote: On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Stephen Clark wrote: I have discovered that if I disable quaqqa/ospfd then I don't lose mbufs! This makes it appear that the mbuf leak is in the multicast routing logic. In fact I lose mbufs even with the both system basically idle but with a 100

Stable Build Error

2006-04-24 Thread Lawrence Farr
I've been seeing this for a week or so, and have deleted /usr/obj and run make ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Stable Build Error

2006-04-24 Thread Lawrence Farr
I've been seeing the following for a week or so, and have deleted /usr/obj , re-cvsupped and run cd /usr/src && make cleandir && make cleandir make.conf is empty. Anyone got any ideas? ===> kerberos5/tools/make-roken (all) ===> kerberos5/tools/asn1_compile (all) cd /usr/src/kerberos5/tools/as

Re: Stable Build Error

2006-04-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 04:18:06PM +0100, Lawrence Farr wrote: > I've been seeing this for a week or so, and have deleted > /usr/obj and run make My telepathy powers aren't working. What's the error? :) -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655

Re: HP DL145G2 SCSC Raid Controlle Q

2006-04-24 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Thomas Krause wrote: TK> Hello, TK> I hope, this question is not off topic for this list. TK> In the HP config tool for the DL145 I can select a TK> HP PL100 SCSI RAID Controller (PN 355671-B21) TK> Does this controller work with FreeBSD? I'm not sure, if this TK> is a relable

Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

2006-04-24 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> kKK> > one of my servers had to be rebooted uncleanly and then I have backgrounded DM> KK> > fsck locked for more than an our in snaplk: DM> KK> > DM> KK> > 742 root 1 -44 1320K 688K snaplk 0:02 0.00% fsck_ufs DM> KK> > DM>

Re: HP DL145G2 SCSC Raid Controlle Q

2006-04-24 Thread Thomas Krause
Dmitry Morozovsky schrieb: On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Thomas Krause wrote: TK> Hello, TK> I hope, this question is not off topic for this list. TK> In the HP config tool for the DL145 I can select a TK> HP PL100 SCSI RAID Controller (PN 355671-B21) TK> Does this controller work with FreeBSD? I'm not s

Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

2006-04-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:04:57PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > DM> kKK> > one of my servers had to be rebooted uncleanly and then I have > backgrounded > DM> KK> > fsck locked for more than an our in snaplk: > DM> KK> > > DM> KK> > 742 roo

Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

2006-04-24 Thread Michael Butler
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: one of my servers had to be rebooted uncleanly and then I have backgrounded fsck locked for more than an our in snaplk: Given that this system came down uncleanly, have you tried starting up in single-user and manually doing an fsck (without '-p') on the afflicted fil

Re: 6.1RC system nearly freezing

2006-04-24 Thread Henri Hennebert
Robert Watson wrote: On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Henri Hennebert wrote: I upgrade a web, squid, mail server (under SMP with 2 pentium III) to 6.1-RC (Apr 9 2006) and encounter 2 `freezing'. The system is still responding to http requests but I can't login on the console or through ssh -- no shell

Re: 6.1RC system nearly freezing

2006-04-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Henri Hennebert wrote: Are you running with WITNESS and INVARIANTS enabled? If not, could you do so and see if the problem is reproduceable, and if so, whether or not WITNESS (and friends) generate any warnings? It looks like something has leaked a lock, resulting in de

Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

2006-04-24 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> > What bothers me most is that it is the only machine reproducibly hangs in KK> > snapshots, and it did not hang before RELENG_5 -> RELENG_6 upgrade. Other KK> > RELENG_6 machines do snapshot backups flawlessly (knock-on-wood!) KK> KK> Are you quite

Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

2006-04-24 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Michael Butler wrote: MB> Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: MB> > one of my servers had to be rebooted uncleanly and then I have MB> > backgrounded fsck locked for more than an our in snaplk: MB> MB> Given that this system came down uncleanly, have you tried starting up in MB> single-

Re: 6.1RC system nearly freezing

2006-04-24 Thread Henri Hennebert
Robert Watson wrote: On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Henri Hennebert wrote: Are you running with WITNESS and INVARIANTS enabled? If not, could you do so and see if the problem is reproduceable, and if so, whether or not WITNESS (and friends) generate any warnings? It looks like something has leaked a

Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

2006-04-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:24:07AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > KK> > What bothers me most is that it is the only machine reproducibly hangs > in > KK> > snapshots, and it did not hang before RELENG_5 -> RELENG_6 upgrade. > Other > KK> > RELEN

Re: 6.1RC system nearly freezing

2006-04-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:28:11PM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote: > At the first boot I got a panic on a gif interface. I don't need it now so > I commented it out of rc.conf.local and reboot. What panic? This shouldn't happen, naturally. > I am at home and the serial console is not connected. I

Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

2006-04-24 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: KK> > I'll try to build DDB kernel tomorrow evening to check. Which commands should I KK> > issue in ddb ? KK> KK> 'show lockedvnods', 'ps' and 'alltrace' are important. Last note: are these lines added enough? Or some are unneeded? options KD

Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

2006-04-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:45:08AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > KK> > I'll try to build DDB kernel tomorrow evening to check. Which commands > should I > KK> > issue in ddb ? > KK> > KK> 'show lockedvnods', 'ps' and 'alltrace' are important. >