Re: libnetgraph compilation problem

2006-01-11 Thread Frédéric PRACA
Selon Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Do you have ccache stuff in /etc/make.conf? Yes, but I already tried with NOCCACHE and the problem is still there. Fred ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: libnetgraph compilation problem

2006-01-11 Thread Frédéric PRACA
Selon Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > F> > Is your /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_split.h file correct? > F> I just cvsup'ed few hours ago with RELENG_6. Of course, I could hack the > source > F> code but that's not my goal. > > May be /usr/include/netgraph/ng_split.h is incorrect? But if it affec

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-11 Thread Brian Szymanski
Stijn, thanks for your help, I'm getting closer... >> I took 6.0 for a test drive today and was disappointed to find that >> vinum/gvinum are still in disarray. For example there is a man page for >> vinum, but only a gvinum binary. gvinum help still lists lots of old >> vinum >> commands that are

[5.4-p6] Trouble with swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer on LSI(PERC4)-RAID on Dell PE6650

2006-01-11 Thread Raphael H. Becker
Hi *, one of our Dell PE6650 (4x Xeon, HTT, 2GB RAM) crash from time to time with kernel messages like: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device amrd1s1d, blkno 77 Any access to the RAID is impossible (e.g. login on console, shutdown, ... ), have to powercycle it. What is the meaning of this

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-11 Thread Stijn Hoop
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 06:58:34AM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote: > Stijn, thanks for your help, I'm getting closer... Great! > > > But most importantly, gvinum configuration (at least for a raid-5 plex) > > > still doesn't persist across a reboot :( > > > > That's a bug; I think it might be relat

Re: libnetgraph compilation problem

2006-01-11 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:51:06AM +0100, Fr?d?ric PRACA wrote: > Selon Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > F> > Is your /usr/src/sys/netgraph/ng_split.h file correct? > > F> I just cvsup'ed few hours ago with RELENG_6. Of course, I could hack the > > source > > F> code but that's not my g

Re: Recurring problem: processes block accessing UFS file system

2006-01-11 Thread Denis Shaposhnikov
Hi! > "Don" == Don Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Don> Are you using any unusual file systems, such as nullfs or Don> unionfs? >> Yes, I'm use a lots of nullfs. This is a host system for about 20 >> jails with nullfs mounted ro system: Don> That would be my guess as to the cause of

Re: libnetgraph compilation problem

2006-01-11 Thread Frédéric PRACA
Selon Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think I asked you this question already, but... Do you have ccache stuff > in your /etc/make.conf? If not, show me your /etc/make.conf and the exact > command you use to build world. Ouups, sorry, I forgot this part of your question. I have ccache st

Re: libnetgraph compilation problem

2006-01-11 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:52:30AM +0100, Fr?d?ric PRACA wrote: > Selon Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Do you have ccache stuff in /etc/make.conf? > Yes, but I already tried with NOCCACHE and the problem is still there. > The example in /etc/make.conf that you copied from the port is w

GDM problem

2006-01-11 Thread Justin Smith
After upgrading to STABLE a few days ago, several odd problems developed: 1. cups did not start automatically. It turned out the CUPS script was being given the parameter 'faststart' rather than 'start' 2. GDM started but in an odd mode that didn't detect any keyboard input (so I couldn't log

Re: GDM problem

2006-01-11 Thread Paul T. Root
Two of us just went through it, last week. A number of tweaks gets you going again, but the real answer is to set: VTAllocation=true in /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/gdm.conf You may want to set the Virtual Terminal you want as well. I turn off 5-8 to tty, and have mine come on VT5. I never use the four a

Re: gvinum/vinum on 6.0

2006-01-11 Thread Joan Picanyol i Puig
* Brian Szymanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20060111 13:01]: > >> But most importantly, gvinum configuration (at least for a raid-5 plex) > >> still doesn't persist across a reboot :( > > > > That's a bug; I think it might be related to compiling gvinum

[6.0-RELEASE] Trouble with

2006-01-11 Thread Raphael H. Becker
Hi *, there's another system causing me headaches: It is an Intel-Server with onboard SATA-RAID Controller (Adaptec Firmware [1]). The two Seagate Barracuda SATA Drives[2] are configured as RAID1(mirror). The system worked fine, for example cvsup, bonnie++, make world and so on worked for me fo

Re: [6.0-RELEASE] Trouble with

2006-01-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
Raphael H. Becker wrote: So I guess will need another SATA-RAID-Controller (PCI). Which SATA-RAID-controller works "rock solid" with 6.0-RELEASE? 3ware, areca, and highpoint are good choices. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: RELENG_6 devfs problem

2006-01-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Daniel O'Connor wrote: I just installed the latest mgetty and ran it, then found it wasn't talking to my modem so I disabled it in /etc/ttys and killed the process. I ran fstat /dev/cuad0 to check it was dead and fstat got stuck in the devfs state. It seems that everythin

Re: 6.0-STABLE Panic

2006-01-11 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Dikshie wrote: Dear All, my 6.0-STABLE always panic when "make buildworld" This is actually a long-standing bug, but comes to light when accounting is used with recent versions of INVARIANTS, whcih are better able to detect the bug. In principle, if you turn off INVARIAN

Re: [5.4-p6] Trouble with swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer on LSI(PERC4)-RAID on Dell PE6650

2006-01-11 Thread Jim Pingle
Raphael H. Becker wrote: > Hi *, > > swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device amrd1s1d, blkno 77 > > Any access to the RAID is impossible (e.g. login on console, shutdown, > ... ), have to powercycle it. > > What is the meaning of this message? I have encountered this error once before, and

powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
It seems that powerd does very little in terms of reducing heat, and sacrifices performance while doing so. Am i wrong to assume that lowering the cpu's frequency should reduce consumed power, and therefore reduce the amount of heat produced? I have tested with mbmon and i see no difference bet

Re: powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:57, Mike Jakubik wrote: > It seems that powerd does very little in terms of reducing heat, and > sacrifices performance while doing so. Am i wrong to assume that > lowering the cpu's frequency should reduce consumed power, and therefore > reduce the amount of heat produced? I

Re: powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:57, Mike Jakubik wrote: It seems that powerd does very little in terms of reducing heat, and sacrifices performance while doing so. Am i wrong to assume that lowering the cpu's frequency should reduce consumed power, and therefore reduce the amoun

Re: powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:52, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > powerd won't run your CPU at a specific clock frequency - it varies the > > CPU frequency based on current load conditions. > > The load was 0, only thing that was running was mbmon. Fair enough.. still.. makes testing simpler IMO. > > You could

Re: powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:52, Mike Jakubik wrote: powerd won't run your CPU at a specific clock frequency - it varies the CPU frequency based on current load conditions. The load was 0, only thing that was running was mbmon. Fair enough.. still.. makes testi

Re: powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Jonathan Noack
Mike Jakubik wrote: Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:52, Mike Jakubik wrote: powerd won't run your CPU at a specific clock frequency - it varies the CPU frequency based on current load conditions. The load was 0, only thing that was running was mbmon. Fair enough.. still.. make

Re: powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:05, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > Fair enough.. still.. makes testing simpler IMO. > > Agreed. However thats how i tested it :P Heh > > What does sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq_levels say? > > CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1410.21-MHz 686-class CPU) > > # sysctl dev.cpu.0 > dev.cpu.0.%des

Re: powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
Daniel O'Connor wrote: Wow, that's weird, wish my AMD would do speeds like that :) As for your temperature observation - I have no idea sorry. It would appear that powerd is doing the right thing but for some reason your CPU is not benefiting. That said checking by measuring temperature is fra

Re: FreeBSD Update is the binary update solution [Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006]

2006-01-11 Thread Jo Rhett
> >On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 10:47:38AM +0100, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > >> While I agree with much of your reasoning, I know exactly zero > >> people running a modified kernel of any version of Windows, > >> Mac OS X or Solaris, to name just three commercial OS's. > On Fri, 2006-Jan-06 02:34:40 -

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2006-01-11 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 06:44:36AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > In general, volunteer projects have a surfeit of ideas and a shortage > of real implementations. The Project is never going to agree to import > an idea without some substance. Always true, and I wouldn't expect less. But we've cov

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2006-01-11 Thread Jo Rhett
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:16:36PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > You're trying to target to large of an audience... You need to get _A_ > committer interested in your work, and get HIM to guide you and commit > your work... DING! Now we are FINALLY understanding what my goal for this topic w

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates..

2006-01-11 Thread Jo Rhett
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 01:05:13PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > So *you're* the AC that keeps predicting the death of *BSD on /.! I have no idea what you are referring to. Not something I would say anyway. > > I don't bother writing up patches for FreeBSD because every time I > > do they

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2006-01-11 Thread Jo Rhett
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:20:11PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > I imagine there are a few committers interested, but I'd say you need to ask > the right way first.. As in...? But again, there are lots of people interested in this topic. Colin for an obvious one. But if Colin can't convince

Re:powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Zoran Kolic
Hi all! This issue was written over and over, and a lot of people, including me, have more questions. Don't want to crosspost, cause I think that it is related. On Celeron M laptop, with cpufreq and powerd, also with this in rc.conf: performance_cx_lowest="LOW" economy_cx_lowest="LOW" I have C

Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006)

2006-01-11 Thread Jo Rhett
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:27:18PM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote: > I'm actually wondering how yahoo for instance handles this situation. To > my knowledge, they have several thousand of FreeBSD based servers. > Either they are all the same in regards to configuration and version, or > they have some

Re: powerd effectiveness

2006-01-11 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:27:13PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote: > It seems that powerd does very little in terms of reducing heat, and > sacrifices performance while doing so. Am i wrong to assume that > lowering the cpu's frequency should reduce consumed power, and therefore > reduce the amount o