Hello!
Will rcorder on /usr/local/etc/rc.d problem solved before the 5.4
release? Or it will be still run only for /etc/rc.d?
--
With respect,
Boris
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-s
Ken Smith wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:57:11PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Ken Smith wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/todo.html
Is SCHED_ULE abandoned for 5.x?
I wouldn't go as far as to say that but at the moment there are no plans
to make changes in the default scheduler for 5.4. A
Eli K. Breen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running in to an issue where I can't set the clock on a machine
> because the secure level was bumped to 2 before the clock was set.
> Unfortunately adjustments are now clamped to < 1s. Is there any way I
> can force ntpd to adjust the clock by
EVERYBODY: Could you please check if you have a rl(4) driven NIC and check if
you experienced a speed degradation as well. Please let me know either way
with information about the chipset on your NIC. Thanks!
Hi,
I'm using several 8139 NICs, all of them do good :)
since 5.3 I'm every now and t
Hi all, I know this is quite off topic for this lists, I was wondering
if you guys will agree to share your anti-spam softwares' spam
lists...
the reason is obvious...
Especially for SpamAssasin...
Thank,
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li
Hi all, I know this is quite off topic for this lists, I was wondering
if you guys will agree to share your anti-spam softwares' spam
lists...
the reason is obvious...
Especially for SpamAssasin...
Thanks,
Dan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing l
I'm sorry if I was annoying, i hit send and then saw that i wrote
"Thank", instead of "Thanks" and I thought to be polite
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:30:18 +0100, Ruben de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Spamming multiple lists with multiple copies of the same off-topic
> messages is good en
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 23:34, Dorian Büttner wrote:
> > EVERYBODY: Could you please check if you have a rl(4) driven NIC and
> > check if you experienced a speed degradation as well. Please let me know
> > either way with information about the chipset on your NIC. Thanks!
>
> Hi,
> I'm usi
I'm not sure that this will cut it as it will days a very long time to
adjust to the proper time. Is there any way to speed this up?
-E-
David Magda wrote:
On Feb 2, 2005, at 16:56, Eli K. Breen wrote:
Lastly this machine is in production and cannot be rebooted.
Stop the NTP daemon and restart i
On Thursday, February 03, 2005 5:57 PM, Eli K. Breen <> unleashed the infinite
monkeys and produced:
> I'm not sure that this will cut it as it will days a very long time to
> adjust to the proper time. Is there any way to speed this up?
Not within NTPd itself. You could go with manually steppin
Rob MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eli K. Breen wrote:
> > I'm not sure that this will cut it as it will days a very long time to
> > adjust to the proper time. Is there any way to speed this up?
>
> Not within NTPd itself. You could go with manually stepping the time in 1s
> interv
Sorry for replying to myself ...
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding to that, the following /bin/sh snippet should do
> (untested!). You have to kill ntpd before.
>
> STEP=100# number of seconds to step forward
> while [ $STEP -gt 0 ]; do
> date -f %s $(( `dat
Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well-behaved 3rd party scripts ought to start Perl via:
> #! /usr/bin/env perl
Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which
have /bin/env?
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
In the last episode (Feb 03), Christian Weisgerber said:
> Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well-behaved 3rd party scripts ought to start Perl via:
> > #! /usr/bin/env perl
>
> Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which
> have /bin/env?
Are there any system
On Feb 3, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Well-behaved 3rd party scripts ought to start Perl via:
#! /usr/bin/env perl
Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which
have /bin/env?
Name one such system. [1]
Hint: the path to env isn't going to change on a standar
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:54:02AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> Ok, so the plan is to MFC the changes into RELENG_5? AFAIK, the ULE code
> in RELENG_5 is still the same as in 5.3-release.
>
That's correct.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from
ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
This is the much rumoured ATA update that I've been working on for some time.
It contains a number of new things, and lacks a few features of the old code.
New items include:
o ATA is now fully newbus'd and split into modules.
This means that on a mo
Charles Swiger:
> >Why should the authors of those scripts break them for systems which
> >have /bin/env?
>
> Name one such system. [1]
There was a discussion about this a few years ago on comp.unix.shell.
Let's see...
http://tinyurl.com/45zqx
Ah, I see, the starting point was actually the reve
On Feb 3, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
[ ... ]
Ah, I see, the starting point was actually the reverse assumption
that all systems had /bin/env. Somebody mentioned /sbin/env on
Irix, but I don't know whether that was instead of /usr/bin/env or
in addition to it.
Of course I can alw
have a look at this compiling a eggdrop had the same with some other
apps as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eggdrop1.6.17 # make config
make: Permission denied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eggdrop1.6.17 # make config
make: Permission denied
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eggdrop1.6.17 # cd ..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gazzeh # cd eggdr
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:52:57PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
>
> As usual, even if it works on all the HW I have here in the lab, thats by
> far not the same as it works on YOUR system. So use glowes and safety shoes
> and if it breaks I dont want the pieces, but would like to hear the nifty
> d
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 21:52:57 +0100, Søren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ATA-mkIII first official snapshot.
Using it without any problems on a few days old 6.0-CURRENT (P2 400 MHz)
I decided to take the plunge and go for the kernel-module-approach.
The only thing i was curious about is if t
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:40:43 -0800, Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only thing i was curious about is if there is any way to build the
> kernel-module using ATA_STATIC_ID .. (as i used to do in my normal
> kernel-configs)
Ok .. I whacked myself with the proverbial clue-stick .. and
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
> > > I can't reproduce this on my systems, many of which started at 5.3 and now
> > > build 5-stable. Are you using the system ssh or one you built from ports?
> > >
> > > What is the output of 'ls -l /etc/login.conf*'?
>
> I knew I wasn't hallucina
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, David Gilbert wrote:
> Gmirror on the fix-it CD appears to be impotent. It appears to have
> only 'help', 'list', 'load' and 'unload' as commands. Not useful.
If you manually load the geom_mirror.ko kernel module it probably gets
useful. Someone pointed out that there's a ha
25 matches
Mail list logo
