Am Sonntag, 7. November 2004 06:30 schrieb secmgr:
> On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 04:16, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> > Did you try to simply 'start' the plex? This works for
> > initialisation of a newly created RAID5-Plex as well as for
> > recalculating parity informations on a degraded RAID5-Plex.
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 02:19:25AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> im trying to get some use of the linux emulation :), ive got a debian box
> just for iptables tryouts (thats a waste of a machine:). i guess the best
> choice is to get it to work in my fbsd5 and play there, but,
> linux_base-deb
Hi,
With 5.3 it has become much easier to add swap as a regular file,
remove it later, or add a bigger or smaller one instead.
The swap partition always causes me little headache: once the
size is choosen at partitioning during install, it's fixed.
I can't size it up or down anymore, unless I go fi
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 07:46:45PM +0900, Rob wrote:
> So, why not using swapfile without swap partition at all.
> Have it on a big partition with lots of space. If there's a
> problem with the space, I can easily move the swap elsewhere.
> A swapfile is so much more flexible.
>
> Is there a down
Pawel Malachowski wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 07:46:45PM +0900, Rob wrote:
So, why not using swapfile without swap partition at all.
Have it on a big partition with lots of space. If there's a
problem with the space, I can easily move the swap elsewhere.
A swapfile is so much more flexible.
Is
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 21:16, Rob wrote:
> With 5.3 it has become much easier to add swap as a regular file,
> remove it later, or add a bigger or smaller one instead.
>
> The swap partition always causes me little headache: once the
> size is choosen at partitioning during install, it's fixed.
> I can
I just successfully completed a source code upgrade from 4.10 to 5.3.
All pretty perfect and seamless, thank you!
However, just noticed a problem when I run:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wicontrol -i wi0 -C
[1/1614089728]: 32:80:00:00:00:00, 61.0.0.0, sig: 0, noise: 0, qual: 0
[2/1614089728]: 00:00:00:00:00
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:12:38PM +0900, Rob wrote:
> I don't have, and I'm not interested in kernel crashes.
> In that case, is there no difference between the use of
> swap partition and swapfile?
Performance I guess (more abstraction layers because swapfile
is accessed via filesystem).
--
Scott Long wrote:
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE. This release marks a milestone in the FreeBSD 5.x
FTP
---
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/
The file
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/README.TXT
needs an upda
Rob wrote:
Scott Long wrote:
It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of
FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE. This release marks a milestone in the FreeBSD 5.x
The file
/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile
says at the top
# This file contains all of the "CVSup collections"
Hi,
I have installed 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD on dual amd64 with 4Gb ram and
problem with sk driver is still present. At least system is no longer
crashing, but when I try file copy from server (eiter via nfs or ftp) sk0
hangs with message: sk0 watchdog timeout. It makes no difference if kernel
is co
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Goran Gajic wrote:
Hi,
> I have installed 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD on dual amd64 with 4Gb ram and
> problem with sk driver is still present
check the archives; to get an overview perhaps start at
http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/if_sk.html
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
From all patches submited I have found that only sk_jfree locking
makes some difference (no more kernel crashes) but problem
with copying from (not to) server over NFS or ftp is still bringig
sk into hang state and sk watchdog timeouts :(
skc0: port 0x3000-0x30ff mem
0xd830-0xd8303fff irq 2
secmgr wrote:
No, I mean self corrupting raid5 sets during initialization. Discussed
about 2-3 weeks ago.
In the following message you seemed to claim that adding 64 sectors of
slack to the
beginning of the vinum partition fixed this problem, as I suggested. Did
that fix it or not?
The rea
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:01:07PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 02:19:25AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > im trying to get some use of the linux emulation :), ive got a debian box
> Linux emulation is for userland apps, IPTables won't work.
user-mode-linux is user
All,
I installed 5.3R on one of my systems, but as soon as I attempt to compile
something (make buildworld), after 10 seconds or so gcc bombs with an
internal compiler error,
and/or the machine crashes with a 'fatal trap 12' error. This seems to
happen at random places.
The dumps and some screen
Hello Mohd
man ipfw is your frend!
Am Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:08:55PM +0800 Mohd Rasfan schrieb:
> Hello All,
>
> what is the diffrent between firewall stable and current
> what is diffrent beetween deny or reject what is the best market practice
>
> Best Regards ,
> @@
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 05:50:10PM +0100, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
> > Linux emulation is for userland apps, IPTables won't work.
> user-mode-linux is userland. Does it work with freebsd linux emulation?
UML relies on host Linux kernel.
Only some Linux syscalls are emulated under FreeBSD.
UML h
It did, but can you tell me anywhere in the docs it says to do that? Or
maybe that vinum should sense that and throw some error rather than just
blindly corrupting itself.
jim
On Sun, 2004-11-07 at 09:38, Joe Koberg wrote:
> secmgr wrote:
>
>
> >No, I mean self corrupting raid5 sets during init
* Joan Picanyol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 18:09]:
> * Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 14:24]:
> > - It would be useful to see if less complicated NFS meta-transactions than
> > "Start GTK" can trigger the problem. For example, doing a large dd to a
> > file in NFS, varying the
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Joan Picanyol wrote:
> * Joan Picanyol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 18:09]:
> > * Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20041025 14:24]:
> > > - It would be useful to see if less complicated NFS meta-transactions than
> > > "Start GTK" can trigger the problem. For example, do
[Reposted, no answer from the SCSI list]
I'm wondering if this has been seen before exactly? I'm seeing the
following on a FreeBSD server:
/kernel: (da1:ahd1:0:0:0): SCB 0x12 - timed out
/kernel: (da1:ahd1:0:0:0): Other SCB Timeout
/kernel: ahd1: Recovery Initiated - Card was not paused
Googling
I just got a panic with GENERIC 5.3-RELEASE:
Script started on Mon Nov 8 08:42:44 2004
$ cd /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC
$ kgdb kernel /var/crash/vmcore.1
[GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so:
Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"]
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD
23 matches
Mail list logo
