Pawel Malachowski wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 07:46:45PM +0900, Rob wrote:
So, why not using swapfile without swap partition at all.
Have it on a big partition with lots of space. If there's a
problem with the space, I can easily move the swap elsewhere.
A swapfile is so much more flexible.
Is there a downside of not using swap partition, and have only
swapfile instead?
What about saving kernel crashdumps? :)
Saving what?
I add swap to my system just for having more virtual RAM
during regular operation of the OS.
I don't have, and I'm not interested in kernel crashes.
In that case, is there no difference between the use of
swap partition and swapfile?
Rob.
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
