Hi,
> riker# dd if=riker-bin.068 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 4.869752 secs (215324315 bytes/sec)
I'm afraid that reading from file might give too good results since
you might be getting data from filesystem cache
Hi,
From: "ict technician" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Where's the other CPU?
> What's da0 - send dmesg output
The other CPU is sure active, at least when I look at things with top.
da0 is another pair of disks, but older ones. I don't expect them
to perform that well.
Here is dmesg:
I installed (and run) 4.9R on a DELL 600SC without any problems.
> --- "N. Fung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Has anyone gotten 4.9R to recognize the "ServerWorks
> > CSB6" ATA
> > controller on a Dell 600SC? How about installing
> > 5.2R on a 600SC? 5.2R
> > recognizes th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
>
> I think I heard Raymond Wiker say:
> >Ari Suutari wr
> Hello!
>
> Has anyone gotten 4.9R to recognize the "ServerWorks CSB6" ATA
> controller on a Dell 600SC? How about installing 5.2R on a 600SC? 5.2R
> recognizes the said controller, but it corrupts data.
We are using Dell 600SC with ServerWorks CSB6 for FreeBSD
5.1-RELEASE-p11. The machine
Jose F Nieves wrote:
I installed (and run) 4.9R on a DELL 600SC without any problems.
Sure, but 4.9R couldn't recognize the ServerWorks ATA controller and
without /boot/loader.conf.local saying:
hw.ata.ata_dma=0
it would corrupt data when copying stuff from one HD to another.
--
eof
---
UEDA Hiroyuki wrote:
...skipped ...
We are using Dell 600SC with ServerWorks CSB6 for FreeBSD
5.1-RELEASE-p11. The machine's dmesg is here:
...skipped...
atapci0: port
0x8b0-0x8bf,0x374-0x377,0x170-0x177,0x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 15.1 on pci0
ad0: 38146MB [77504/16/63] at ata0-master
I have been getting reboots of my box occassionaly under 4-STABLE for
awhile, and I would like some help trying to track it down.
Hardware:
1. Soltek 75DRV5.
2. 512MB Crucial unbuffered ECC memory
3. Ti4200 nVidia card
Software:
FreeBSD thor.farley.org 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Wed Dec 31
I was wondering if there is any way to misrepresent the hardware address
of a given card for the purpose of not having to call my ISP every time
I connect a different BSD box to my cable modem.
Any help is appreciated.
Dennis
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailin
[Please don't reply to random messages to start a new thread. It
confuses threaded mail readers.]
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:20:40PM -0500, Dennis Antunes wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any way to misrepresent the hardware address
> of a given card for the purpose of not having to call my I
All,
It's time for bi-monthly status reports. This one is a little late due
to the excitement of releasing 5.2, so please submit reports for Oct-Dec
2003. As always, the template is at
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml, and submissions
go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] While this repor
Hello.
OS:
# uname -a
FreeBSD devel.ucsnet.ru 4.8-RELEASE-p13 FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p13 #9: Wed Nov 26
12:38:10 YEKT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/PAVELSH_DEVEL i386
Problem - error message "No buffer space available".
But,
# netstat -m
145/18656/32768 mbufs in use (current/peak
12 matches
Mail list logo
