How about a configuration of two Ad-hoc cards pointing towards eachother between two
buildings
and an IPSec tunnel is applied. Wouldn't it be great if (unencrypted) packets
destined to go through
that IPSec tunnel could go through in full ethernet size, without fragmentation, pr
host tcp
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 06:09:11PM -0600, Dave Uhring said:
> > You do realize, I hope, that Linux and Solaris roll over their uptimes
> > at something like 492 days.
>
> from http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/accuracy.html#whichos
> --
> Additionally HP-UX, Linux, Solaris and recent releases of Free
I have noticed that if I disconnect the serial port from my usb to serial adapter and
leave the dongle
in(Aten International Serial adapter, SiS 5571 usb controller), my machine will
reset as soon as I
[Attempt to] send data from the usb side. So maybe you are losing carrier signal
sometime d
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 10:05:05 -0800 (PST) Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 26 www.cravath.com 102 ok892 939 940 Solaris 8
> Apache/1.3.27 (Unix) PHP/4.2.3
>
> That's certainly more than 492 days... so even if they do reboot,
> netcraft is ignoring it or accomodating it s
Just a quick email to let everyone interested know that it all seems to be working again.
Thanks!
--Shaun
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike Hogsett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:02 AM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability
> I like to point people in the direction of:
>
> http://uptime.netcraft.c
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 02:17, Mark wrote:
>
> What is it that makes people rave about the longest uptime? To me, this is
> just a list of sites whose admins have neglected to perform the necessary
> upgrade-maintenances, seemingly for almost three years even. To me, this is
> just a list of potenti
> I haven't seen FBSD 4.7 system with uptime > 1000 days, for quite
> obvious reasons.. Should I recommend everyone to install FBSD 2.2.8
> since it has good uptime records? :)
Sorry to step into the middle of a thread here, but to me it says that
FreeBSD has had, and likely continues to have, a
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2003-01-03 at 02:29:49 Chris Doherty wrote:
>
> >> Additionally HP-UX, Linux, Solaris and recent releases of FreeBSD cycle
> >> back to zero after 497 days
>
> > wacky. how/why is this the case?
>
>
