At 08:18 PM 4/9/01 -0700, Yann Sommer wrote:
>Heya all,
>
>I've been following this thread with some extra attention, since I remember
>beeing new to FreeBSD and complaining about a dedicated Server I ordered,
>running BETA. It is just, as has been mentioned a few times before on this
>list, again
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
in machine was installed:
fxp0, fxp1, fxp2, xl0, ep0.
(ep0 record included in kernel file)
After cvsup/make world/make-install kernel/reboot
( FreeBSD 4.3-RC #0: Tue Apr 10 01:02:55 MSD 2001 )
ep1 was appeared instead ep0.
I hope, in 4.3-R|ELEASE this bug was fixed?
Hi all,
Last night I tried to upgrade to 4.3RC2 but have had problems. Here's what
I did. Sorry for the brief info but I am not at my machine. Any insight
would be appreciated.
I cvsup'd to latest. Which was only about 4 files as I have been keeping
track but not installed since March 20th
Hello !!
I have problems with high load on FBSD box. First I had the 4.2 STABLE ,
then I cvsuped to 4.3-RC. Same thing.
When high traffic occurs on 100mbit hub, to wich is fxp0 connected, load
and processor usage on natd process is very high and after a while it
won't pass packets anymore to out
Hello !!
I have problems with high load on FBSD box. First I had the 4.2 STABLE ,
then I cvsuped to 4.3-RC. Same thing.
When high traffic occurs on 100mbit hub, to wich is fxp0 connected, load
and processor usage on natd process is very high and after a while it
won't pass packets anymore to out
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Lehey writes:
>> # disklabel -r -w da0s1 auto
>> /kernel: da0: cannot find label (no disk label)
>> /kernel: da0: cannot find label (no disk label)
>> /kernel: da0s1: cannot find label (no disk label)
>> /kernel: da0s1: cannot find label (no disk label
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 03:54:32PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> Next, the case of the bind and ntpd updates. Yes, these were fixed
> in -STABLE and -CURRENT very quickly, but were only documented in UPDATING.
> How many people who are running -RELEASE have this? That's right, none. If
> the
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:29:43AM +1200, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Christopher Schulte wrote:
> > At 03:45 AM 4/10/2001 +1200, Dan Langille wrote:
> > >Give meaningful and widely used names to things which people are familiar
> > >with.
> >
> > -CURRENT fits all those requirements
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 05:55:13PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> > > Just because the problem is difficult to solve does not mean it can not be
> > > or should not be solved.
> > Fine, how about you solve it and the rest of us will get back to all
> > the o
On 10-Apr-2001 Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> At 07:45 PM 4/9/01 -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
>
>>On 09-Apr-2001 Miha Nedok wrote:
>> >> I really wish it'd be possible to just make selective portions
>> >> of the source tree, is that possible?
>> >
>> > You might look at /etc/defaults/make.conf
>>
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 01:38:15PM -0400, Michael R. Rudel wrote:
> x.x-BETA is ... notoriously buggy. It has bugs, that's the point of the
x.y-GAMMA rather than x.y-BETA might would be a good move. Then we'd
have 1/2 the world asking what "GAMMA" means. We could then hit over the
head them wit
FreeBSD Admin wrote:
> Can someone point me to a clear step-by-step explanation of how to do
> this? I have cvsup'd the stable sources and the ports, but now what?
1. Set KERNCONF=FOO in /etc/make.conf, where FOO is the name of your kernel.
2. cvsup, you say you've done that bit.
3. # cd /usr
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:16:45PM -0700, Christian Chen wrote:
> > But why is "something" breaking ? The build process should be clean. If
> > not, something is messed in your source code repository.
>
> Well, I know that when I installed 4.2-RELEASE off of CD, make world
> in /usr/src did not
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:36:20PM -0400, FreeBSD Admin wrote:
> Please bear with me. I have tried to understand this process, but still it
> is not clear to me. I have read
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/current-stable.html
> http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/synching.html
> http://www.freebs
Kind regards and grateful appreciateion to those who responded. I thyink I
get it now. Thanks again. - Ralph
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
:I have a dual-homed machine doing routing and firewalling on which hundreds
:of the following messages appear in my logs every 10 minutes or so:
:
: /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 44069/200 pps
: /kernel: arp: runt packet
: last message repeated 14691 times
:
:At the same time these m
subscribe freebsd-stable
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Hello all,
You'll have to excuse me, I'm quite the new user. I sychronized my source
with the stable branch using cvsup. Everything went ok with buildworld but
now installworld is giving me errors. I get something along the lines of:
ln: /usr/share/man/man3/mvaddnstr.3.gz
no such file
rm -f
:: Seems to me that if the lowest-common-denominator had some way to
:: stay stable that didn't involve using cvsup or a compiler, this would
:: be a non-issue.
::
:: Numbered binary patches, anyone?
Troll!
;-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in
problem fixed. I misread the handbook and thought I could use the -j during
make for the installworld. I got rid of it and all was well.
thanks
Gregg
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 12:07:34PM +0200, Marko Cuk wrote:
>
> I have also 84 ipfw rules for firewall ( most of them reset and deny and
> a few dummynet pipes ).
> Is the processor too slow for that ?
Depending on the order of these rules: possibly.
--
Bill Fumerola - security yahoo /
"Bruce A. Mah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It seems that they've been moved, the new ata(4) explains how to set them
> > (ie from the loader)
>
> And it's also mentioned in RELNOTES.TXT:
>
> # To provide more flexible configuration, the various options for the
> # ata(4) driver are now boot
Since, noone supplied a patch that will help users to find the
information when the tag changes from -STABLE/-CURRENT to -BETA
or -RC. I created a patch to newvers.sh that will display an
informitive message.
This patch changes the version string to include a message
that can be used to inform t
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010410 17:11]
wrote:
> Since, noone supplied a patch that will help users to find the
> information when the tag changes from -STABLE/-CURRENT to -BETA
> or -RC. I created a patch to newvers.sh that will display an
> informitive message.
>
> This patch c
24 matches
Mail list logo
