On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:45:07PM +0200, Karsten Patzwaldt wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I'm running 4.0-stable on a VAIO PCG-F400 and it seems as if APM is
> broken. When I enable APM in my kernel config, I can access APM infos
> etc., but when I try to suspend the computer, I get this message:
[...}
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have tried posting this about three times from my computer at home,
> but it never seems to go through. Unfortunately, I do not currently
> have access to the log of this, but if this makes it through this time
> I will attempt to make it availabl
* Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000410 13:34] wrote:
> > Ok, this looks like my machine is doing fine with this patch and doesn't
> > wedge under heavy IO anymore.
> >
> > Mike, any objections to putting this in 4.0?
>
> Yes; I plan to MFC the last megapatch ASAP. I just need a box to test it
On Mon, 2414 Sep 1993, Rob Nelson wrote:
> Can you provide a pointer to a web or ftp site for `screamto'? I
> haven't heard of this before and can find nothing on the search engines
> regarding screamto.
Well, maybe. Essentially, what I have is the source k0dez that I
was haX0ring almost a yea
They list some other 8 port cards, but none of the part numbers
match. has anybody tried any of the new ones?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Sun, 9 Apr 2000 00:05:16 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>I'm running a 10Mb ethernet and recently it has started taking a very logn
>time to connect and log into one system from another. These systems are
>all FreeBSD 4.0 of various dates, most recently April 6. I have an Ftp
>login, from the most
It seems that with 4.0 and a serial console enabled vidcontrol
panics the kernel with a pagefault.
I was unable to get a crashdump because of some other breakage and
I can't investigate this too heavily because this is a production
box. (grr)
I do however have a lot of config information to hope
Tony Byrne wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Apr 2000 00:05:16 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
>
> >I'm running a 10Mb ethernet and recently it has started taking a very logn
> >time to connect and log into one system from another. These systems are
> >all FreeBSD 4.0 of various dates, most recently April 6. I h
You don't have a line saying just "cd" at the start of your
.profile/bashrc/.cshrc by any chance, do you?
Graham
On Tue, 2 Jan 1996 01:22:11 +, you wrote:
> Hi. I'm seeing some "weird" stuff with my 4.0-STABLE box. The
> symptom is:
>
> tim:/tmp$ gdb /bin/pwd
> GNU gdb 4.18
>
>
> Has anyone got 4.0 working with recording from any soundcards?
> There are several I don't have, but the best result I've had has
> been a static-filled recording from a SB PCI 128 or PCI 16. I've
> always been able to get clean, quiet recording from 3.4, so I'd
> say you should stick with 3.x
I have a PostScript printer queue that, if I print multiple jobs to it, it
almost always stalls between each job. I have to "give it a kick" with:
lpc start all
to get it to go on and print more jobs.
Any idea why this might be happening?
I've attached my printcap. I print PostScript to
i've got a BB1008 i can throw in for testing if you need info on it. it's
just sitting in a box. right now, i have no real use for it. let me know if
u need any info on it. fyi: it's a few years old.
-Otter
- Original Message -
From: "Jaye Mathisen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECT
All-
For a while, I tracked 3.4-STABLE using the RELENG_3_4_0_RELEASE tag in my
supfile. When I decided to make the move to 4.0, I used
RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE instead. After the update completed, I checked
/usr/src/UPDATING for the 3.4 -> 4.0 "recipe" that has been publicized on
this list. In a
On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:25:54PM -0400, Paul A. Howes wrote:
> All-
>
> For a while, I tracked 3.4-STABLE using the RELENG_3_4_0_RELEASE tag in my
> supfile. When I decided to make the move to 4.0, I used
> RELENG_4_0_0_RELEASE instead. After the update completed, I checked
> /usr/src/UPDATIN
14 matches
Mail list logo
