> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 02:08:06 -0800
> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > I have several systems with broken PCI chipsets that I need to upgrade to
> > 3.4-R from 2.2.7-R. I've patched 'pcibus.c' to fix the problem on these
> > systems (reversed the
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Kiril Mitev wrote:
> In other words "2.2 is our most stable version"
I hope you realise that no single person speaks for FreeBSD, especially
people who aren't committers. That said, a lot of people found 2.2 to be a
very stable branch. A lot of people found the same thing ab
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Kiril Mitev wrote:
>
> > In other words "2.2 is our most stable version"
>
> I hope you realise that no single person speaks for FreeBSD, especially
> people who aren't committers. That said, a lot of people found 2.2 to be a
*sigh*
yes i do, a "newbie" wont
> This i
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Didier Derny wrote:
>
> > freebsd seems running version after version and not stability...
>
> > in 1999 (3.x) I was not so sure at all, no stability too many problems.
>
> hmmm
>
> # uptime
> 1:44AM up 46 days, 22:
At 17.34 30/03/00 +, you wrote:
>next time I shall remember to put SARCASM somewhere in BIG letters ..
>(my fault, yes)
Yes Kiril,
Let's do a little joke huh? Stay in tune and prepare your flames:) I tried
2.2.8, maybe was stable but was also the most ignorant system ever seen.
Rude and pur
At 07:13 PM 3/30/00 +0200, The Unicorn wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Didier Derny wrote:
>>
>> > freebsd seems running version after version and not stability...
>>
>> > in 1999 (3.x) I was not so sure at all, no stability too many problems.
>
Thanks for all the useful suggestions! I exchanged the board for a Gigabyte
GA-7IXE and the DIMMs for 2 x 256MB PC100 6ns with 5 year warranty, i.e.
supposedly quality parts and I also got a (newer) 650 MHz Athlon. So far
this combination seems to be absolutely stable, not a single process has
die
Just general question about these types of hardware problems. Do they
occur often under NT or windows as well? Or does FreeBSD just seem to
push hardware to its limits more?
jm
--
Jonathon McKitrick -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The spice must flow
On 30-Mar-00 C J Michaels wrote:
> Judging the stability of 3.x by the postings in this list is inaccurate.
> The purpose of this list is to help with problems/questions/etc... Of
> course people aren't going to post daily "my 3.x system works great,
> thanks!".
My 3.4-STABLE system works great
> > I have several systems with broken PCI chipsets that I need to upgrade to
> > 3.4-R from 2.2.7-R. I've patched 'pcibus.c' to fix the problem on these
> > systems (reversed the config mode probe order) but now I need to build
> > boot/install stiffies to get these machines up and running. Is th
Hi,
I'm using freebsd 3.4-RELEASE with CREATIVE CD-RW RW4224E:
/kernel: wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): , removable,
accel, dma, iordis
/kernel: acd0: drive speed 4125KB/sec, 1860KB cache
/kernel: acd0: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track
/kernel: acd0: supported write types: CD-R, CD-R
For anyone who'd like to know, I was able to successfully upgrade to 4.0-RELEASE
by downloading the source tarballs, and unpacking them in my /usr/src directory.
I cleared it out of the old 3.4 sources beforehand, and found that you must
first compile a 4.0 kernel and reboot before attempting a ma
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Steve O'Hara-Smith" writes:
: to be at least as good as 2.x'.
... if not better...
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
13 matches
Mail list logo
