This crap definitely does not belong on this list.
Please take it offline.
> At 7:56 PM +0200 1999/9/6, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > Please stop spreading such disinformation. It only comes across as an
> > infantile attempt to cover up the fact that you didn't do your
> > homework, and it
Is it possible to limit this flamewar to just one list or, even better, move
it off the freebsd lists?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 03:58:12PM +0400, Gene Sokolov wrote:
> Is it possible to limit this flamewar to just one list or, even better, move
> it off the freebsd lists?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the place for this kind of thing ;)
Joe
--
Josef KarthauserFreeBSD: How many times have you boote
on Tuesday, 7 Sep 1999 15:58:12, Gene Sokolov wrote:
> Is it possible to limit this flamewar to just one list or, even better, move
> it off the freebsd lists?
I agree, I can't understand where this will arrives. We are spend our
time, personal troubles and gossips aren't matters to any freebsd l
[At the risk of posting to the wrong list, as I deleted the original
message after reading it ...]
Jordan wanted to know if the Power Pak had been seen at any CompUSA
stores outside of California. Well, I saw it today at a CompUSA here
in Lexington KY for $49.99 and bought a copy since my order
This is primarily to Mr. Brad Knowles, who cannot fathom what else the
readers of this list would rather do than read his alarmist rants. I do not
(and neither does anyone else) want a reply, and I only provide this to the
entire list so we can use the archived version to deal with others like Mr
Brad Knowles wrote in message ID
:
> Someone else was kind enough to explain to me why bpf is needed
> -- DHCP depends on it. While I find this a very regrettable
> situation, and I would encourage work to try to help ensure that this
> is not the c
I'm using WMaker, and I'm not using the "no async dns" option. Whatever the
combination is, X grows in memory until it exposes hardware instabilities in
my system. X never gets that big in memory unless I run Communicator. It's
just that the odds of a crash are low when I'm not using much memory a
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> I recently received the request (accompanied by patches to emphasize the
> importance :-) from Junho Choi to add xpm to linux_base. xpm is used by X
> binaries, including Netscape. I'm in doubt. What's your opinion?
I think it would be great! xpm is r
> > Have all the problems wrt cvsupp-ed kernel builds been sorted out then ?
> > Or should 'to be upgraded' boxes hold back for a couple more days ?
>
> You should be able to build the world and kernels in -stable now.
>
> - Jordan
>
>
Thanks
--
Kiril Mitev, IT Operations Mgr, London
IDEAgl
In NYC, a friend of mine saw it at a CompUSA for 39.99. Wow, I didn't
realize it'd be so cheap.
Kenn Martin wrote:
>
> [At the risk of posting to the wrong list, as I deleted the original
> message after reading it ...]
>
> Jordan wanted to know if the Power Pak had been seen at any CompUSA
On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Laurence Berland wrote:
> In NYC, a friend of mine saw it at a CompUSA for 39.99. Wow, I didn't
> realize it'd be so cheap.
I was going to attempt an online order, however it seems that the site
isn't Netscape friendly (i get a blank page), either that or demand for
the P
[Given the nearness of 3.3, I've put what I can quickly in a message
here. If opening a PR with more info would help, please let me
know.]
I've just updated my SMP test machine to STABLE as of today and can
now repeatably hang the box. Looks like it's stuck at some spl level,
as it will respo
On Tue, Sep 07, 1999 at 11:15:21AM +, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Laurence Berland wrote:
>
> > In NYC, a friend of mine saw it at a CompUSA for 39.99. Wow, I didn't
> > realize it'd be so cheap.
>
> I was going to attempt an online order, however it seems that the si
14 matches
Mail list logo