On 2007-May-24 16:19:07 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
>> * Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
>> > I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
>> > upgrade had gone t
On Saturday 26 May 2007 10:22:23 Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 May 2007 09:14:21 Stefan Lambrev wrote:
> >> This is off topic in this mail list.
> >>
> >> Why do not you please move the thread to freebsd-x11/freebsd-ports
> >> Most of us are subscribed to this list becaus
On Saturday 26 May 2007 09:14:21 Stefan Lambrev wrote:
>
> This is off topic in this mail list.
>
> Why do not you please move the thread to freebsd-x11/freebsd-ports
> Most of us are subscribed to this list because they are interested in
> FreeBSD-STABLE,
> and if we want to read discussions about
Hi,
JoaoBR wrote:
On Friday 25 May 2007 23:36:24 Scot Hetzel wrote:
On 5/25/07, JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... it tells to run script xorg-upgrade but this xorg-upgrade does not
exist either
The UPDATING entry does not tell you to run a script named
xorg-upgrade, it tel
On Friday 25 May 2007 23:36:24 Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On 5/25/07, JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... it tells to run script xorg-upgrade but this xorg-upgrade does not
> > exist either
>
> The UPDATING entry does not tell you to run a script named
> xorg-upgrade, it tells you to run the script
On 5/25/07, JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... it tells to run script xorg-upgrade but this xorg-upgrade does not exist
either
The UPDATING entry does not tell you to run a script named
xorg-upgrade, it tells you to run the script(1) command, which will
then save all output to the file xorg-
On Friday 25 May 2007 13:54:04 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> JoaoBR wrote:
> > Roland Smith wrote:
> > > It didn't. All the drivers were in one huge package, the X server. Now
> > > they are in seperate ports. But the xorg or xorgs-drivers meta-ports
> > > should install all of them.
> >
> > ok, tha
Roland Smith wrote:
Tools like portupgrade and portmaster and even the ports system are
great but they have their limitations. I think they are kept relatively
simple for a reason. It's much better to have a simple (maintainable)
tool that does 95% of the jobs well than to build an extremely
com
JoaoBR wrote:
> Roland Smith wrote:
> > It didn't. All the drivers were in one huge package, the X server. Now
> > they are in seperate ports. But the xorg or xorgs-drivers meta-ports
> > should install all of them.
>
> ok, that is what I ment, the better way would be that portupgrade instal
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:59:51AM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> >Grr, OK. Well, you might have got it wrong, so we still need to see a
> >portupgrade log from someone who followed the directions.
>
> Kris,
>
> FWIW - I followed the instructions in UPDATING - unfortuna
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Grr, OK. Well, you might have got it wrong, so we still need to see a
portupgrade log from someone who followed the directions.
Kris,
FWIW - I followed the instructions in UPDATING - unfortunately I did 'em
pretty much as I read 'em... so I noticed the CAVEAT *after* th
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:45:52AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 17:08 -0400]:
> > > Unfortunately portupgrade (nor portupgrade-devel) cannot yet handle
> > > the rigors of the xorg upgrade without a small bit of help:
> > >
> > > # portupg
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 17:08 -0400]:
> > Unfortunately portupgrade (nor portupgrade-devel) cannot yet handle
> > the rigors of the xorg upgrade without a small bit of help:
> >
> > # portupgrade -Rf libXft
> >
> > before you do the portupgrade -a?
>
> No, that is t
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:42:38PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 16:19 -0400]:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > * Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
> > > > I've found this proble
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 16:19 -0400]:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
> > > I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
> > > upgrade had gone the mos
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
> > I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
> > upgrade had gone the most cleanly). font-alias _is_ installed but
> > most of my pcf.gz files
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:46:24AM +0400, grimnir wrote:
> You can try to install x11-fonts/font-alias port, this may fix the problem.
nope:
jhengis~ % pkg_info | grep font-alias
font-alias-1.0.1X.Org Font aliases
pkg_info: show_file: can't open '+COMMENT' for reading
This does not seem to be
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-May-23 11:06:46 +0300, Iulian M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Andriy Babiy wrote:
Fatal server error:
could not open default font 'fixed'
On another thread the conclusion was that installing x11-fonts/font-alias
solved the fixed font problem.
* Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]:
> I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the
> upgrade had gone the most cleanly). font-alias _is_ installed but
> most of my pcf.gz files are corrupt (20 bytes long).
>
> 'portupgrade -f' on my fonts is fixing t
On 2007-May-23 11:06:46 +0300, Iulian M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Andriy Babiy wrote:
>> Fatal server error:
>> could not open default font 'fixed'
>
>On another thread the conclusion was that installing x11-fonts/font-alias
>solved the fixed font problem.
I've found t
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:06:46AM +0300, Iulian M wrote:
> >
> > Yep... you have to rebuild everything. Not to fix the error but just
> > because you don't read other threads on the ML
> >
> >
> > On another thread the conclusion was that installi
>Hmm, I have the x11/xorg port, same problem "could not open default font
>'fixed'" Oh, well. So now I have an X-less system, Don't mind so much myself,
>but my other family members freaked out :( They thought the shell prompt was
>an error message!
You can try to install x11-fonts/font-alias p
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 03:26:25PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> As I've said a *number* of times already (and as is mentioned in the
> UPDATING instructions), install the x11/xorg port to obtain a complete
> installation.
Hmm, I have the x11/xorg port, same problem "could not open default font
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:18:12PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 17:51:34 Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:29:54PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
I also haven't read anything and got terrible caught by this 7.2 xorg
thing
Says it
On Wed, 23 May 2007, JoaoBR wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 17:51:34 Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:29:54PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
I also haven't read anything and got terrible caught by this 7.2 xorg
thing
Says it all, really. :-)
you're not laughing at me aren't you?
i'm
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 18:46:41 Roland Smith wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:18:12PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 May 2007 17:51:34 Roland Smith wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:29:54PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > > I also haven't read anything and got terrible caught by thi
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:18:12PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 May 2007 17:51:34 Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:29:54PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > > I also haven't read anything and got terrible caught by this 7.2 xorg
> > > thing
> >
> > Says it all, really. :-)
> >
>
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 17:51:34 Roland Smith wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:29:54PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> > I also haven't read anything and got terrible caught by this 7.2 xorg
> > thing
>
> Says it all, really. :-)
>
you're not laughing at me aren't you?
> > and kind of lame that portu
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:29:54PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> I also haven't read anything and got terrible caught by this 7.2 xorg thing
Says it all, really. :-)
> and kind of lame that portupgrade xorg does not install the modules,
And how is portupgrade to know which specific drivers you need?
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 16:26:25 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:06:46AM +0300, Iulian M wrote:
> >
> > Yep... you have to rebuild everything. Not to fix the error but just
> > because you don't read other threads on the ML
> >
> >
> > On another thread the conclusion was tha
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:06:46AM +0300, Iulian M wrote:
>
> Yep... you have to rebuild everything. Not to fix the error but just because
> you don't read other threads on the ML
>
>
> On another thread the conclusion was that installing x11-fonts/font-alias
> solved the fixed font problem.
On Wednesday 23 May 2007, Andriy Babiy wrote:
> > You need at least the following ports:
> >
> > x11-drivers/xf86-video-mga
> > x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse
> > x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard
>
> I wanted to thank everybody who helped me. I added those ports, and that
> fixed the problem I h
32 matches
Mail list logo
