On 2007-May-24 16:19:07 -0400, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:00:11PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: >> * Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-24 21:40 +1000]: >> > I've found this problem on one system (the one where I thought the >> > upgrade had gone the most cleanly). font-alias _is_ installed but >> > most of my pcf.gz files are corrupt (20 bytes long). >> > >> > 'portupgrade -f' on my fonts is fixing this but I'm not exactly sure >> > why it occurred to start with. >> >> bdftopcf fails if it uses the old library from X11R6. The 20 bytes are >> the compressed empty output of the failing bdftopcf. >> >> Nicolas > >Sounds like it is being upgraded out of order, we need a full log to >figure out why.
Looking closer, I was wrong about it being a clean upgrade in my case. The ports INDEX and INDEX.db (though not the ports tree) would have been "corrupted" (by my regular ports tree update) partway through the portupgrade. I suspect it can be put down to operator error but can provide my upgrade logs if you want to investigate. -- Peter Jeremy
pgpD5wNF0iUZV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
