On 12/16/2011 14:59, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> It really looks much easier than i thought initially.
Awesome!
--
[^L]
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:51:26PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 13:40, Michel Talon wrote:
> > Adrian Chadd said:
> >
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
> >>
> >> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
On 12/16/2011 14:16, Michel Talon wrote:
> Of course, you are perfectly right., and i had misunderstood Adrian's
> post.
Happens to the best of us. :)
> But if the problem is only to change scheduler by rebooting, i think
> it is no more expensive to compile a kernel with the other scheduler.
>
Le 16 déc. 2011 à 22:51, Doug Barton a écrit :
> On 12/16/2011 13:40, Michel Talon wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd said:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
>>>
>>> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
>>> boot-time, so th
On 12/16/2011 13:40, Michel Talon wrote:
> Adrian Chadd said:
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
>>
>> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
>> boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting?
>>
>> That may be an a
Adrian Chadd said:
> Hi all,
>
> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
>
> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
> boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting?
>
> That may be an acceptable solution for now.
As Luigi explained, the pro
On 12/16/2011 12:53, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
>
> Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
> boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting?
>
> That may be an acceptable solution for now.
That, o
Hi all,
Can someone load a kernel module dynamically at boot-time?
Ie, instead of compiling it in, can 4bsd/ule be loaded as a KLD at
boot-time, so the user can just change by rebooting?
That may be an acceptable solution for now.
Adrian
___
freebsd-
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:46:35AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 16.12.2011 09:11, schrieb Luigi Rizzo:
> > The interesting part is probably the definition of the methods that
> > schedulers should implement (see struct _sched_interface ).
> >
> > The switch from one scheduler to another was imp
Am 16.12.2011 09:11, schrieb Luigi Rizzo:
> The interesting part is probably the definition of the methods that
> schedulers should implement (see struct _sched_interface ).
>
> The switch from one scheduler to another was implemented with a
> sysctl. This calls the sched_move() method of the curr
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:11:43AM +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> > Real time scheduler changing would be insane! I was thinking that
> > both/any/all schedulers could be compiled into the kernel, and the
> > choice of which one to use becomes a bo
11 matches
Mail list logo
