On Saturday, July 25, 2015 03:54:40 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> John,
>
> I'm concerned that two issues may be getting conflated.
>
> The issue I thought we were looking at was the failure of some systems
> (T520, X220, T430) to resume after a number of PCI enhancements were MFCed.
> This is comple
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Claude Buisson wrote:
> On 07/29/2015 23:53, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Claude Buisson
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/26/2015 00:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>>
>>> John,
I'm concerned that two issues may be getting conflated.
On 07/29/2015 23:53, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Claude Buisson wrote:
On 07/26/2015 00:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
John,
I'm concerned that two issues may be getting conflated.
The issue I thought we were looking at was the failure of some systems
(T520, X220, T430)
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Claude Buisson wrote:
> On 07/26/2015 00:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> John,
>>
>> I'm concerned that two issues may be getting conflated.
>>
>> The issue I thought we were looking at was the failure of some systems
>> (T520, X220, T430) to resume after a number o
On 07/26/2015 00:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
John,
I'm concerned that two issues may be getting conflated.
The issue I thought we were looking at was the failure of some systems
(T520, X220, T430) to resume after a number of PCI enhancements were MFCed.
This is completely unrelated to the USB issu
Hi,
Yes, the USB device suspend/resume thing is a more generic
suspend/resume problem. Warner has some ideas - eg, registering a "is
this a new device?" method; the device driver will check if the device
has changed upon resume and optionally go through a detach/reattach
process. So for USB it cou
John,
I'm concerned that two issues may be getting conflated.
The issue I thought we were looking at was the failure of some systems
(T520, X220, T430) to resume after a number of PCI enhancements were MFCed.
This is completely unrelated to the USB issue I was experiencing when
trying to test the
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, July 18, 2015 10:22:33 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > I just confirmed that my system resumes on HEAD of July 16 but fails on
> > 10.2-BETA2. So the problem limited to 10. I'm guessing that some other
> > change made to pci that has
On Saturday, July 18, 2015 10:22:33 PM Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I just confirmed that my system resumes on HEAD of July 16 but fails on
> 10.2-BETA2. So the problem limited to 10. I'm guessing that some other
> change made to pci that has not been MFCed is the cause, but it is only
> causing a proble
I just confirmed that my system resumes on HEAD of July 16 but fails on
10.2-BETA2. So the problem limited to 10. I'm guessing that some other
change made to pci that has not been MFCed is the cause, but it is only
causing a problem on some hardware. I have seen no reports about systems
other than
Head worked for me.
Joseph Mingrone writes:
> On head, resume worked, but the fn-f4 keybinding didn't suspend. I
> had to use zzz.
Joseph Mingrone writes:
> No problem with -head on the X220 as well.
Joseph
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hold the phone! Just found a SATA drive. I will be installing HEAD on it
shortly. I won't update the ticket until I get that tested.
Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Kevi
I think it works on HEAD. I suspended OK and tried to resume. The resume
initiated and my screen came on... only to tell me that da0p2 was not
available. I seem to recall that this was a known issue when running on a
USB attached disk. The failure came much further along than on stable where
it fai
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:07 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 03:10:59 PM Brandon J. Wandersee wrote:
> >
> > Please forgive me if this seems impudent, but has there been any
> progress on
> > this? The status of the bug report hasn't changed since it was opened. I
> > don't
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 03:10:59 PM Brandon J. Wandersee wrote:
>
> Please forgive me if this seems impudent, but has there been any progress on
> this? The status of the bug report hasn't changed since it was opened. I
> don't mean to be rude, and I certainly appreciate the effort that's gone
Please forgive me if this seems impudent, but has there been any progress on
this? The status of the bug report hasn't changed since it was opened. I
don't mean to be rude, and I certainly appreciate the effort that's gone
into this already (especially Kevin's detective work), but support for
susp
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:45 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> I'm traveling and AFK for a week or so more, but I did test this MFC
> including suspend/resume with CardBus, etc. on a T440 before committing
> it. It would be good to know if HEAD works for you. If it does then
> there's likely another fi
I'm traveling and AFK for a week or so more, but I did test this MFC including
suspend/resume with CardBus, etc. on a T440 before committing it. It would be
good to know if HEAD works for you. If it does then there's likely another fix
from HEAD that you need merged.
--
John Baldwin
> On Ju
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Adrian Chadd
wrote:
> Ok, so which subset of changes is the culprit?
>
> (sorry, I'm tired.. :( )
>
>
> The merge of 281874 broke it. Unfortunately, this is a fairly large and
important change that touches five files, mainly dev/pci/pci.c and
dev/pci/pci_pci.c wi
Ok, so which subset of changes is the culprit?
(sorry, I'm tired.. :( )
-a
On 28 June 2015 at 22:45, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>>>
>>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>>> > ok. I've upda
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>> > ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and it is okay at
>> > suspend/resume.
>>
>> No problem with -head on the X220 as well.
>>
>> > I can go a
Thanks for digging into this!
(two laptops are now running -head from today, all iswell. I'll update
the t400 tomorrow.)
-a
On 28 June 2015 at 16:54, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>>
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>> > ok. I've updated my x230 to t
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> Adrian Chadd writes:
> > ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and it is okay at
> > suspend/resume.
>
> No problem with -head on the X220 as well.
>
> > I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another
> > ref
Adrian Chadd writes:
> ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and itis okay at
> suspend/resume.
No problem with -head on the X220 as well.
> I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another
> reference laptop.
You might ping Allan Jude. If I'm not mistaken he had at
Hi,
ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and itis okay at suspend/resume.
I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another
reference laptop.
I don't run stable/10 on anything, so it may be something odd with
what he MFCed and what's in stable/10.
I'll update the othe
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>
>> Kevin Oberman writes:
>> > I have narrowed it to between 283990 and 284074. Have to crash, so maybe
>> > someone else will track it down by tomorrow. I only see a handfull (<10)
OK. This time I'm REALLY adding jhb@ to the CC. Guess my first cup of tea
had not kicked in.
Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 201
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> Kevin Oberman writes:
> > I have narrowed it to between 283990 and 284074. Have to crash, so maybe
> > someone else will track it down by tomorrow. I only see a handfull (<10)
> > commits in there that look like possible causes. 280434 is
Kevin Oberman writes:
> I have narrowed it to between 283990 and 284074. Have to crash, so maybe
> someone else will track it down by tomorrow. I only see a handfull (<10)
> commits in there that look like possible causes. 280434 is compiling right
> now as the prime candidate.
Cool. I think you
On 06/28/2015 09:12, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Brandon J. Wandersee <
brandon.wander...@gmail.com> wrote:
Kevin Oberman writes:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
Adrian Chadd writes:
does it always fail now?
Yes. The behaviour I descr
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Brandon J. Wandersee <
brandon.wander...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Kevin Oberman writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> >
> >> Adrian Chadd writes:
> >> > does it always fail now?
> >>
> >> Yes. The behaviour I described is, so far w
Kevin Oberman writes:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>> > does it always fail now?
>>
>> Yes. The behaviour I described is, so far with 15-20 tries, consistent.
>>
>
> I confirm that I see the similar behavior on my T520 ThinkPad, Sandy Brid
Adrian Chadd writes:
> please start binary searching.
> I'll update my x230 tonight when I get home and see if -head is
> broken.
On head, resume worked, but the fn-f4 keybinding didn't suspend. I had
to use zzz.
I'm trying different different revisions and I'll report back when I
find somethi
Hi,
please start binary searching.
I'll update my x230 tonight when I get home and see if -head is broken.
-adrian
On 27 June 2015 at 15:48, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>>
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>> > does it always fail now?
>>
>> Yes.
Kevin Oberman writes:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
>> Adrian Chadd writes:
>> > does it always fail now?
>> Yes. The behaviour I described is, so far with 15-20 tries, consistent.
> I confirm that I see the similar behavior on my T520 ThinkPad, Sandy Bridge
> s
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> Adrian Chadd writes:
> > does it always fail now?
>
> Yes. The behaviour I described is, so far with 15-20 tries, consistent.
>
I confirm that I see the similar behavior on my T520 ThinkPad, Sandy Bridge
system.
FreeBSD rogue 10.2-PRERE
Adrian Chadd writes:
> does it always fail now?
Yes. The behaviour I described is, so far with 15-20 tries, consistent.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
does it always fail now?
-a
On 26 June 2015 at 14:06, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
> This is on a Lenovo X220. Suspend/resume was working until some time
> between late April and last week's STABLE snapshot.
>
> Suspend always seems to work, but there are two issues with resume.
>
> 1) When i915kms
This is on a Lenovo X220. Suspend/resume was working until some time
between late April and last week's STABLE snapshot.
Suspend always seems to work, but there are two issues with resume.
1) When i915kms isn't loaded, then resuming works, but the screen
doesn't come back on. I'm able to ssh in
39 matches
Mail list logo
