Hold the phone! Just found a SATA drive. I will be installing HEAD on it shortly. I won't update the ticket until I get that tested.
Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it works on HEAD. I suspended OK and tried to resume. The resume > initiated and my screen came on... only to tell me that da0p2 was not > available. I seem to recall that this was a known issue when running on a > USB attached disk. The failure came much further along than on stable where > it failed immediately with fans turning on, but nothing else happening, > and, if I could connect the disk directly, I suspect it would work. > Unfortunately, I don't have a spare SATA disk... only old PATA drives and > the T520 only takes SATA drives. > > Bottom line is that the issue I saw with 10.1-STABLE and 10.1-BETA1 is not > present on HEAD, so this is entirely a regression in STABLE. > > I will be updating to BETA2 shortly and I'll report how it works there. > > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkober...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:07 PM, John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 03:10:59 PM Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: >>> > >>> > Please forgive me if this seems impudent, but has there been any >>> progress on >>> > this? The status of the bug report hasn't changed since it was opened. >>> I >>> > don't mean to be rude, and I certainly appreciate the effort that's >>> gone >>> > into this already (especially Kevin's detective work), but support for >>> > suspend-to-RAM and my laptop's hotkeys were essentially the only >>> reasons >>> > I started tracking 10-STABLE to begin with. Since both features were >>> > resolved many months ago, I was hoping to switch from -STABLE to >>> 10.2-RELEASE >>> > when it came out, but I'm starting to get the feeling that won't happen >>> > because of a single errant commit. Having to continue following -STABLE >>> > would not be terrible, but it would be disappointing. >>> >>> As noted previously, I have been moving house and generally offline since >>> mid-June (and I'm not really fully online yet). My last request was if >>> Kevin (or someone else with an affected laptop) could test HEAD to see if >>> there is a missing bugfix on HEAD that needs to be merged. This specific >>> change was tested on HEAD on both a T440 and X220 and on 10 to test the >>> MFC on the T440. >>> >>> -- >>> John Baldwin >>> >> >> John, >> >> I am back from my vacation and hope to try HEAD soon, hopefully this >> weekend. Since HEAD has been a bit fragile of late, I do plan on testing >> and switching back to STABLE. I will probably install HEAD on a spare >> drive. With luck (meaning nothing crops up that fills the available time), >> I should have an answer on Monday. >> >> Hope the move was not too chaotic and life gets back to normal quickly. >> (I hate moving, but I do so twice a year. Practice makes something >> approaching perfect.) >> -- >> Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired >> E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com >> PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 >> > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
