[SOLVED] 'ifconfig lagg0.300 create' fails with 'SIOIFCREATE2: Device not configured' on r368459

So accurate, so fast awesome people here Good day everyone ;) https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=368502 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any

[SOLVED] 12.2-STABLE: Commit 367740 breaks IMAP/SMTP server authentication

Hi, I finally managed to solve this issue: the MTU of all bridged network interfaces had to be reduced from 1500 down to 1490. (The external interface was on 1490 already.) I still don't understand why these patches of commit 367740 could cause this, and I do not have the knowledge to understa

Re: efi and serial console (solved)

On 7/19/2019 6:24 PM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019, 12:59 PM mike tancsa, > wrote: > > I installed a RELENG12 snapshot from July 11th and having a hard time > getting serial console to work. In the past, I would have something > simple like > > >

Re: ipfw "unknown interface name igb1" SOLVED

Thanks for replying, Sergey. The "igb" device is no longer available as an option in the kernel source - I need to use "em" instead. Without "em" most things still work, though - just not the ipfw rules on boot. Strangely, my interfaces still come up as "igb". Anyway, with "em" it all now wo

[SOLVED] LD Segfaulting at r343001

On 01/13/2019 11:55 am, Larry Rosenman wrote: Upgraded my main public facing host to 12.0-STABLE (r342972) yesterday, and got ports all straightened out. Did an svn up to r343001 (current rev for stable/12) and get the following: Ideas? Not sure why, but killing the /usr/obj (I saved the old

SOLVED: 'loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched' rebuilding ports after upgrade to 12.0-BETA2 r339930

Hello Ronald, On 10/31/18 7:40 PM, Ronald Klop wrote: What version of perl is being upgraded to what version? Same perl version, it was the OS from 11.2p4 to 12b2. As a list colleague suggested, the answer was in the portmaster man page. About the end of it says: 'Using portmaster to do a c

Re: gpart strangeness (solved)

On 8/21/2018 2:30 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 8/21/2018 9:51 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> >> It seems like faulty media to me: it silently returns bad data. OK, it was a config issue on my part! Some legacy config from the long ago days of Soekris 5501s, had hw.ata.ata_dma=0 hw.ata.atapi_dma=0

Re: ATI video problem - slow desktop - 100% cpu load [semi-solved]

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:41:21PM -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: > Vincent Stemen writes: > > > You must load radeonkms.ko after the system is fully booted. > > > > # kldload radeonkms > > > > That automatically loads the other 3 modules and initializes the console > > where > > the console tex

Re: ATI video problem - slow desktop - 100% cpu load [semi-solved]

On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 07:53:42PM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 06/23/18 00:40, Mark Saad wrote: > > Vincent > >I used the scfb driver in openbsd land for a work project > >. Currently I am using 11-STABLE with the Radeon driver but at > >one point I had a different card under 11.0

Re: ATI video problem - slow desktop - 100% cpu load [semi-solved]

On 06/23/18 00:40, Mark Saad wrote: Vincent I used the scfb driver in openbsd land for a work project . Currently I am using 11-STABLE with the Radeon driver but at one point I had a different card under 11.0 that didn’t work unless I used the scfb driver . Hi! If you are using FreeBSD 11.

Re: ATI video problem - slow desktop - 100% cpu load [semi-solved]

Vincent I used the scfb driver in openbsd land for a work project . Currently I am using 11-STABLE with the Radeon driver but at one point I had a different card under 11.0 that didn’t work unless I used the scfb driver . --- Mark Saad | nones...@longcount.org > On Jun 21, 2018, at 11:41 PM,

Re: ATI video problem - slow desktop - 100% cpu load [semi-solved]

Vincent Stemen writes: > You must load radeonkms.ko after the system is fully booted. > > # kldload radeonkms > > That automatically loads the other 3 modules and initializes the console where > the console text goes into higher resolution mode. Then X and the desktop > environments work and

Re: ATI video problem - slow desktop - 100% cpu load [semi-solved]

o confirm that the problem lies in the radeon X server driver that's in the xf86-video-ati package. I tagged this as semi-solved in the subject because it solves our immediate problem and gets us working, but it seems to be a work around to fixing the ati driver problem. Unless FreeBSD is

11.2-RC1-i386-bootonly.iso new install kernel panic - solved?

I installed a 11.2-RC1-i386-bootonly.iso on a Pentium 4 desktop test system.There was a double kernel panic, followed by a single kernel panic.On a manual poweroff/power-on (reboot) I edited both:/boot/loader.conf with the code: i915_load="YES"and/etc/rc.conf with code: kld_list="i915kms".Follow

Re: [solved] buildworld from 11.1-R-p8 to stable/11 fails in contrib/llvm

Deleting /usr/src and svnup'ing it again did indeed solve the problem. > > If not, it is best to delete your source tree and do a fresh checkout. > Even though it looks okay, I am trying that now. Thanks again! Thiemo -- Query a PGP key server (e.g. http://www.pgp.net/) for my public key 2AA

Re: libreoffice fails to build [SOLVED]

On 24/03/2018 19:07, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > Building libreoffice (libreoffice-en_GB) complains about illegal > instruction and dumps core. Full script output is at > https://www.zyxst.net/errors/libreofficebuildfail.txt please ignore, libreoffice builds fine on a pristine installation. --

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

I based my fix heavily on that patch from the PR, but I rewrote it enough that I might've made any number of mistakes, so it needs fresh testing. Ok, have been rebooting with the patch eery ten minutes for 24 hours now, and it comes back up perfectly every time, so as far as I am concerned

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 17:21 +, Pete French wrote: > > On 10/03/2018 23:48, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > I based my fix heavily on that patch from the PR, but I rewrote it > > enough that I might've made any number of mistakes, so it needs fresh > > testing.  The main change I made was to make it

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On 10/03/2018 23:48, Ian Lepore wrote: I based my fix heavily on that patch from the PR, but I rewrote it enough that I might've made any number of mistakes, so it needs fresh testing.  The main change I made was to make it a lot less noisy while waiting (it only mentions the wait once, unless

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 23:42 +, Pete French wrote: > > > > It looks like r330745 applies fine to stable-11 without any changes, > > and there's plenty of value in testing that as well, if you're already > > set up for that world. > > > > Ive been running the patch from the PR in production si

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

It looks like r330745 applies fine to stable-11 without any changes, and there's plenty of value in testing that as well, if you're already set up for that world. Ive been running the patch from the PR in production since the original bug report and it works fine. I havent looked at r330745

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 23:08 +, Pete French wrote: > Ah, thankyou! I haven;t run current before, but as this is such an issue  > for us I;ll setup an Azure machine running it and have it reboot every  > five minutes or so to check it works OK. Unfortunately the error doesnt  > show up consisnten

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

Ah, thankyou! I haven;t run current before, but as this is such an issue for us I;ll setup an Azure machine running it and have it reboot every five minutes or so to check it works OK. Unfortunately the error doesnt show up consisntently, as its a race condition. Will let you know if it fails f

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Sat, 2018-03-03 at 16:19 +, Pete French wrote: > > > > > That won't work for the boot drive. > > > > When no boot drive is detected early enough, the kernel goes to the > > mountroot prompt.  That seems to hold a Giant lock which inhibits > > further progress being made.  Sometimes progre

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

Eugene Grosbein eugen at grosbein.net wrote on Mon Mar 5 12:20:47 UTC 2018 : > 05.03.2018 19:10, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >>> When no boot drive is detected early enough, the kernel goes to the >>> mountroot prompt. That seems to hold a Giant lock which inhibits >>> further progress being made.

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

05.03.2018 19:10, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> When no boot drive is detected early enough, the kernel goes to the >> mountroot prompt. That seems to hold a Giant lock which inhibits >> further progress being made. Sometimes progress can be made by trying >> to mount unmountable partitions on other

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On 3 Mar 2018, at 13:56, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, tech-lists wrote: >> On 03/03/2018 00:23, Dimitry Andric wrote: ... >>> Whether this is due to some sort of BIOS handover trouble, or due to >>> cheap and/or crappy USB-to-SATA bridges (even with brand WD and Seagate >>> disks!),

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

That won't work for the boot drive. When no boot drive is detected early enough, the kernel goes to the mountroot prompt.  That seems to hold a Giant lock which inhibits further progress being made.  Sometimes progress can be made by trying to mount unmountable partitions on other drives, but

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

03.03.2018 19:56, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, tech-lists wrote: > >> On 03/03/2018 00:23, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> Indeed. I have had the following for a few years now, due to USB drives >>> with ZFS pools: >>> >>> --- /usr/src/etc/rc.d/zfs2016-11-08 10:21:29.820131000 +0100 >>

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On 03/03/2018 12:56, Bruce Evans wrote: > That won't work for the boot drive. In my case the workaround is fine because it's not a boot drive -- J. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, tech-lists wrote: On 03/03/2018 00:23, Dimitry Andric wrote: Indeed. I have had the following for a few years now, due to USB drives with ZFS pools: --- /usr/src/etc/rc.d/zfs 2016-11-08 10:21:29.820131000 +0100 +++ /etc/rc.d/zfs 2016-11-08 12:49:52.971161000 +0

Re: zfs problems after rebuilding system [SOLVED]

On 03/03/2018 00:23, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Indeed. I have had the following for a few years now, due to USB drives > with ZFS pools: > > --- /usr/src/etc/rc.d/zfs 2016-11-08 10:21:29.820131000 +0100 > +++ /etc/rc.d/zfs 2016-11-08 12:49:52.971161000 +0100 > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ > > zfs_st

Re: Ryzen issues on FreeBSD ? (summary of 4 issues) (seemingly solved!)

OK, this is all mostly solved for me it seems. points below inline On 1/24/2018 9:42 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I think perhaps a good time to summarize as a few issues seem to be going on > > a) fragile BIOS settings. There seems to be a number of issues around > RAM speeds an

Re: iscsi target and VMware/esxi timeouts -- SOLVED

imilar occasional problems with the former > but never with the latter. > > Patrick the iscsi initiator of the esxi’s (VMware) does answer to NOP’s once in a blue moon! this was checked by sniffing the network. setting kern.cam.ctl.iscsi.ping_timeout=0 solved this. thanks, danny ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: disk errors: CAM status: Uncorrectable parity/CRC error [SOLVED]

On 25/09/2017 08:12, Steven Hartland wrote: Depends on your exact setup, see the ata and ahci man pages e.g. hint.ahcich.X.sata_rev hint.ata.X.devX.sata_rev hint.ata.X.sata_rev hint.ata.X.devX.mode hint.ata.X.mode     Regards     Steve On 24/09/2017 21:02, Graham Menhennitt wrote: On 24/09/201

Re: disk errors: CAM status: Uncorrectable parity/CRC error [SOLVED]

On 06/10/2017 08:32, Graham Menhennitt wrote: On 25/09/2017 08:12, Steven Hartland wrote: Depends on your exact setup, see the ata and ahci man pages e.g. hint.ahcich.X.sata_rev hint.ata.X.devX.sata_rev hint.ata.X.sata_rev hint.ata.X.devX.mode hint.ata.X.mode     Regards     Steve On 24/09/2

[Solved] Bind9 + TCP_FASTOPEN => no rndc

ll have to debug the rndc socket seperately. > > > > > > Thanks for help! > > > Just a note for future readers to say that the fix from the previous message solved this problem. -- Chris __o "All I was trying to do was get home from work.&qu

Re: SLAAC not working [solved]

On Tuesday, September 05, 2017 20:44:49 Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 05.09.2017 20:09, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > $ ping6 fe80:::4013:23::2%lagg0 > ping6: UDP connect: Network is unreachable > >>> > >>> Hmm. Can you show the second word of address in this example? > >>> Is it not

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:06:12PM -0700, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:06:30PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:29:05PM -0700, jungle boogie wrote: > > > On 07/10/2017 10:48 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:00:05PM -0700,

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:06:30PM +, Glen Barber wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:29:05PM -0700, jungle boogie wrote: > > On 07/10/2017 10:48 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:00:05PM -0700, Mark Johnston wrote: > > > > I suspect that this is a result of r32076

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:29:05PM -0700, jungle boogie wrote: > On 07/10/2017 10:48 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:00:05PM -0700, Mark Johnston wrote: > > > I suspect that this is a result of r320763. That change removed a field > > > from struct vm_map_entry, which

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice

On 07/10/2017 10:48 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:00:05PM -0700, Mark Johnston wrote: I suspect that this is a result of r320763. That change removed a field from struct vm_map_entry, which is embedded in struct vm_map. Virtualbox does not reference the fields of stru

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 01:00:05PM -0700, Mark Johnston wrote: > I suspect that this is a result of r320763. That change removed a field > from struct vm_map_entry, which is embedded in struct vm_map. Virtualbox > does not reference the fields of struct vm_map directly, but it does > call vm_map_pm

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 09:47:50PM +0200, José G. Juanino wrote: > El Monday 10 de July a las 21:24:41 CEST, José G. Juanino escribió: > >El Sunday 09 de July a las 23:48:29 CEST, David Boyd escribió: > >>With latest VM-IMAGE (vmdk) for 11.1-RC2 system panics. I haven't > >>been able to process t

[SOLVED] Re: Panic with FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 VM-IMAGE when starting vboxservice

El Monday 10 de July a las 21:24:41 CEST, José G. Juanino escribió: El Sunday 09 de July a las 23:48:29 CEST, David Boyd escribió: With latest VM-IMAGE (vmdk) for 11.1-RC2 system panics. I haven't been able to process the panic completely, but the backtrace looks mysteriously similar to those

Re: [SOLVED] [#2] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:33:10 +0200 Ivan Klymenko wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:57:29 -0800 > hiren panchasara wrote: > > > On 12/28/16 at 07:53P, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:41:42 -0800 > > > hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > > > Can you open a bug report at http

Re: [SOLVED] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:01:18 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote: > On 27.01.2017 14:58, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:46:30 +0300 > > "Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote: > > > >> On 27.01.2017 01:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >>> The reason most panics served as tuning Netisr: > >>> net.i

Re: [SOLVED] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On 27.01.2017 14:58, Ivan Klymenko wrote: On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:46:30 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote: On 27.01.2017 01:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: The reason most panics served as tuning Netisr: net.isr.numthreads=4 net.isr.maxthreads=4 net.isr.bindthreads=1 Apparently, this subsystem at some

Re: [SOLVED] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:46:30 +0300 "Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote: > On 27.01.2017 01:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > The reason most panics served as tuning Netisr: > > net.isr.numthreads=4 > > net.isr.maxthreads=4 > > net.isr.bindthreads=1 > > > > Apparently, this subsystem at some moment had been bro

Re: [SOLVED] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On 27.01.2017 01:33, Ivan Klymenko wrote: The reason most panics served as tuning Netisr: net.isr.numthreads=4 net.isr.maxthreads=4 net.isr.bindthreads=1 Apparently, this subsystem at some moment had been broken. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211836 -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsu

Re: [SOLVED] panics collections on FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 RC2 PRERELEASE RELEASE STABLE

On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:57:29 -0800 hiren panchasara wrote: > On 12/28/16 at 07:53P, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 09:41:42 -0800 > > hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > Can you open a bug report at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > > with necessary details? Looks like virtua

Re: NFS and amd on older FreeBSD [SOLVED]

Karl Young(ka...@kipshouse.org)@2017.01.12 11:00:07 -0800: > Thanks Greg > > One correction. The new server is FreeBSD 9.2, not 9.3. Replies below > > Greg Byshenk(free...@byshenk.net)@2017.01.12 08:58:16 +0100: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:47:37PM -0800, Karl Young wrote: > > > I inherited a

Re: r302669 GENERIC panicking on Amazon EC2 (Solved)

On 2016-07-12 03:52 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote: Hello, I just did a svn update to stable/10 recompiled world/kernel using GENERIC kernel and i am unable to boot this kernel on Amazon EC2 now. Thanks. I took the following flags out of make.conf CPUTYPE?=native CFLAGS+=-maes -mavx And i recompil

Re: [Solved] Problems with ucom/uftdi and sendfax on 10.2 p12 (works like a charm with 7.4)

On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 21:21 +, Holger Kipp wrote: > Dear Ian, > > > On 02.03.2016, at 11:45, Holger Kipp > > wrote: > > > > > > Am 01.03.2016 um 23:08 schrieb Ian Lepore > i...@freebsd.org>>: > > > > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 19:58 +, Holger Kipp wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I currently en

[Solved] Problems with ucom/uftdi and sendfax on 10.2 p12 (works like a charm with 7.4)

Dear Ian, > On 02.03.2016, at 11:45, Holger Kipp wrote: > > > Am 01.03.2016 um 23:08 schrieb Ian Lepore > mailto:i...@freebsd.org>>: > > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 19:58 +, Holger Kipp wrote: > Hi all, > > I currently encounter a problem with sending faxes with new server > and FreeBSD 10.2-RELEA

Re: [SOLVED][BUG??] Unattended install using bsdinstall and ZFS

minal type for your system." echo "Common console types are:" echo " ansi Standard ANSI terminal" echo " vt100VT100 or compatible terminal" echo " xtermxterm terminal emulator (or compatible)" echo " cons25w cons25

Re: [SOLVED][BUG??] Re: Unattended install using bsdinstall and ZFS

Claus Andersen wrote on 05/29/2015 19:17: Hi! A quick re-cap: Want to do an unattended FreeBSD install using bsdinstall and ZFS. I now have a workaround and consider crying wol^H^H^Hbug. The following minimal install script works as expected for UFS: install-ufs.txt DISTRIBUTIONS="kernel.

[SOLVED][BUG??] Re: Unattended install using bsdinstall and ZFS

Hi! A quick re-cap: Want to do an unattended FreeBSD install using bsdinstall and ZFS. I now have a workaround and consider crying wol^H^H^Hbug. The following minimal install script works as expected for UFS: install-ufs.txt DISTRIBUTIONS="kernel.txz base.txz" RELEASE="10.1"

Re: [SOLVED] Only one CPU core detected on Supermicro E3-1240 v3

Marian Cerny wrote: > I am trying to install FreeBSD 9.2-RC4 on Supermicro server with Intel Xeon > E3-1240 v3 processor. The processor has 4 cores with 8 threads. However only > one core is detected (with two threads): > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > FreeBSD/SMP: 1 pa

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Shutdown problem with an USB memory stick as ZFS cache device

the symptom or cures the fault ? Presumably one should use a ZFS command to disassociate whatever might have the cache open ? (in case something might need to be written out from cache, if it was a writeable cache ?) I too had a USB shutdown problem (non ZFS, now solved)& several people

[SOLVED] how to remove usb-storage devices without CAM errors

2013/8/8 Michael Schuh > H i@list, > > i have a simple wuestion caused by a "device loss". > > is there a special routine for unplugging usb-storage devices? > in the meaning: > may be settle some commends before unplugging the device > other than umount. > according to the handbook there ist no

Re: [SOLVED] Re: missing /boot/menusets.4th

> > On Aug 9, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: > > > > > On Aug 9, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Henrik Lidström wrote: > > > >> On 08/09/13 10:28, Daniel Braniss wrote: > >>> as of now (sorry have no rev#) the file > >>> sys/boot/forth/menusets.4th > > Again, apologies... > > Patched stable/9 with forg

Re: [SOLVED] Re: missing /boot/menusets.4th

On 09.08.13 16:19, Teske, Devin wrote: > Again, apologies... > > Patched stable/9 with forgotten MFC of r242688 (see recent SVN r254146). Accepted! that was the worst outage that hit me since a decade or more. It was really STABLE for longtime ;-) But In that stage of boot i was a bit helpless. T

Re: [SOLVED] Re: missing /boot/menusets.4th

On Aug 9, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Henrik Lidström wrote: > >> On 08/09/13 10:28, Daniel Braniss wrote: >>> as of now (sorry have no rev#) the file >>> sys/boot/forth/menusets.4th Again, apologies... Patched stable/9 with forgotten MFC of r2426

[SOLVED] Re: missing /boot/menusets.4th

On Aug 9, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Henrik Lidström wrote: > On 08/09/13 10:28, Daniel Braniss wrote: >> as of now (sorry have no rev#) the file >> sys/boot/forth/menusets.4th >> is not being installed, so boot failes! >> >> danny >> >> >> ___ >> freebs

Re: SOLVED: Re: NFS locking between 8.3-STABLE (jan 2013) and 9.2-BETA2 -- Firefox SQLite locking issue

John Reynolds wrote: > > About all you need to do is add a "V4: ..." line to your > > /etc/exports > > and then set nfsv4_server_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and reboot. > > On the client mount, you need to add "nfsv4" as a mount option. > I had to enable the proper daemons and mount on the client

SOLVED: Re: NFS locking between 8.3-STABLE (jan 2013) and 9.2-BETA2 -- Firefox SQLite locking issue

About all you need to do is add a "V4: ..." line to your /etc/exports and then set nfsv4_server_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf and reboot. On the client mount, you need to add "nfsv4" as a mount option. I had to enable the proper daemons and mount on the client from the actual server mount point (p

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Shutdown problem with an USB memory stick as ZFS cache device

one should use a ZFS command to disassociate whatever might have the cache open ? (in case something might need to be written out from cache, if it was a writeable cache ?) I too had a USB shutdown problem (non ZFS, now solved)& several people made useful comments on shutdown scripts etc, so

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Shutdown problem with an USB memory stick as ZFS cache device

the cache open ? (in case something might need to be written out from cache, if it was a writeable cache ?) I too had a USB shutdown problem (non ZFS, now solved)& several people made useful comments on shutdown scripts etc, so I'm cross referencing: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermai

Re: [SOLVED] Re: Shutdown problem with an USB memory stick as ZFS cache device

itch off the laptop. > >> > >> The problem is always reproducible. > > > > Does sysctl hw.usb.no_shutdown_wait=1 help? > > > > Ronald. > Thank you Ronald it works ! > > In /boot/loader.conf added the line > hw.usb.no_shutdown_wait=1 > > Ma

[SOLVED] Re: Shutdown problem with an USB memory stick as ZFS cache device

On 17/07/2013 11:50, Ronald Klop wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:27:09 +0200, Maurizio Vairani wrote: Hi all, on a Compaq Presario laptop I have just installed the latest stable #uname -a FreeBSD presario 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Jul 16 16:32:39 CEST 2013 root@pre

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

Hello Jeremy On 29.04.2013 20:25, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Nothing on PC architecture is simple any more. Nothing. I my case it was an upgrade from FreeBSD 7.4 to FreeBSD 9.1 without any change on the hardware. The only difference is the serial driver which changed from sio to uart. So I gu

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:14:38AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 29 April 2013 11:00, Fabian Wenk wrote: > > > Is there anything I can do to debug? > > I don't know. Unfortunately there's no active uart maintainer. Eh? I was under the impression Marcel Moolenaar was active and maintaining t

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

On 29 April 2013 11:00, Fabian Wenk wrote: > Is there anything I can do to debug? I don't know. Unfortunately there's no active uart maintainer. That's why I was wondering if someone already knew about whether uart kept underflow/overflow statistics. Adrian ___

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

Hello Adrian On 29.04.2013 19:51, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hm, can you double check the port configuration? is it somehow getting the number of stop bits wrong or something? What about flow control? I did not change anything, I even did not set anything special back with FreeBSD 7.4 during the set

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

Hm, can you double check the port configuration? is it somehow getting the number of stop bits wrong or something? What about flow control? Are there overflow/underflow counters with the uart driver? I wonder if you're hitting issues there. adrian ___

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

Hello Igor On 29.04.2013 04:06, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: Once I narrowed down the problem (acpi uart), I stumbled across http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-15740.html Preventing the ACPI driver from seizing control of UART seems to work and cuau0 is now functional. I have a similar

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

please file a PR! Adrian On 28 April 2013 19:06, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > Once I narrowed down the problem (acpi uart), I stumbled across > > http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-15740.html > > Preventing the ACPI driver from seizing control of UART seems to work > and cuau0 is now f

Re: [Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

Hello, Igor. You wrote 29 апреля 2013 г., 6:06:35: IM> Once I narrowed down the problem (acpi uart), I stumbled across IM> http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-15740.html IM> Preventing the ACPI driver from seizing control of UART seems to work IM> and cuau0 is now functional. Hm. I ne

[Solved] [UART] GPS 18-5Hz LVC and COM1 silence, OK on Linux though...

Once I narrowed down the problem (acpi uart), I stumbled across http://forums.freebsd.org/archive/index.php/t-15740.html Preventing the ACPI driver from seizing control of UART seems to work and cuau0 is now functional. Thanks to all, -- Igor M. :-) ___

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:39:16PM -0700, Unga wrote: > > I think you may be reading too much into the malloc manpage.? When it > > mentions the use of per-thread small-object caches to avoid locking it's > > talking about performance, not thread safety.? Allocations of all sizes > > are thread-saf

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

Quoth Unga : > > > I think you may be reading too much into the malloc manpage.� When it > > mentions the use of per-thread small-object caches to avoid locking it's > > talking about performance, not thread safety.� Allocations of all sizes > > are thread-safe, the library just assumes that huge

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

> > I think you may be reading too much into the malloc manpage.  When it > mentions the use of per-thread small-object caches to avoid locking it's > talking about performance, not thread safety.  Allocations of all sizes > are thread-safe, the library just assumes that huge allocations are ra

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

s, by > > using rtprio_thread() to set it to real time priority, then just have it > > sleep for short random intervals (microseconds), all it does is wakes up > > and goes right back to sleep. > > > > Also, FYI, there's no need to use a mutex in your application to

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

The memory allocator in libc is thread-safe, and in fact is particularly designed for efficient multi-threaded allocation. -- Ian Dear Tony, Alexander, Jan, Ian and Jeremy Thank you very much for your very valuable comments. Problem seems to be solved. But require more testing. 1. Fixed an

Re: FreeBSD 9.1 excessive memory allocations [SOLVED]

llocator in libc is thread-safe, and in fact > is particularly designed for efficient multi-threaded allocation. > > -- Ian > Dear Tony, Alexander, Jan, Ian and Jeremy Thank you very much for your very valuable comments. Problem seems to be solved. But require more testing. 1. Fixed a

SOLVED Re: messed up my ports somehow

Glad I could help :) On 20 Feb 2013, at 21:00, Craig Yoshida wrote: > fixed > you, sir, are a rock star. > > > --- > Craig Yoshioka, Ph.D. > (619) 623-2233 (cell) > The Scripps Research Institute > 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd. > La Jolla,

SOLVED: Cant remove raid from Hard drive

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:49:00 +0700 Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 12.02.2013 22:53, Robert пишет: > > Greetings > > > > I am trying to reuse a 500G harddrive that was previously part of an > > NVIDIA raid in a windows box. > > > > I have tried to clean the disk using "dd if=/dev/zero > > of=/dev/raid

Re: SOLVED, bge bad performance

problem found! the switch/router was beeing overloaded (%$#@! :-), which BTW was my initial thought but I guess I missed checked it. thanks all ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To uns

Re: Solved?: Re: Upgrade of RELENG_8 ZFS boot pool leads to unbootable system

If memory serves me right, Paul Mather wrote: > That's weird. I have the same basic /boot/loader.conf entries > (except for a speed of 115200) and even just putting "-Dh" into > /boot.config leads to the same unbootable system behaviour. :-( > > Maybe something broke recently in the RELENG_8 boot

Re: Solved?: Re: Upgrade of RELENG_8 ZFS boot pool leads to unbootable system

On Jan 4, 2013, at 5:39 AM, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > On 03/01/2013 21:18, Paul Mather wrote: >> >> >> It turns out it was my /boot.config that was preventing booting. The system >> is usually always headless, so I have "-S115200 -Dh" as the sole line in >> /boot.config to enable a 115200 bau

Re: Solved?: Re: Upgrade of RELENG_8 ZFS boot pool leads to unbootable system

On 03/01/2013 21:18, Paul Mather wrote: > > > It turns out it was my /boot.config that was preventing booting. The system > is usually always headless, so I have "-S115200 -Dh" as the sole line in > /boot.config to enable a 115200 baud serial console. This has been working > fine for me up unt

Solved?: Re: Upgrade of RELENG_8 ZFS boot pool leads to unbootable system

On Jan 2, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 02/01/2013 17:49, Paul Mather wrote: >> Yesterday, I updated my RELENG_8 ZFS-only system that has worked like a >> champ for ages. After a successful install{kernel,world} and reboot, I >> noticed the 20121130 entry in /usr/src/UPDATING a

Re: 8.3 -> 9.1 results in often crashes. [Solved]

In closing, Gleb has solved the problem with attached patch. Many thanks to everyone involved and to Gleb for finding out what's wrong and fixing it. p. fwd_tag.diff Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [SOLVED] Re: battery state - hw.acpi.battery.life goes only down

On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 02:24:14 +0200, Michael Schuh wrote: > sorry for the buzz... > > 2012/9/26 Brandon Allbery > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Michael Schuh > > wrote: > > > >> hmm, may be. > >> i didn't thinked about that lithium charging feature. > >> you may right with that.

[SOLVED] Re: battery state - hw.acpi.battery.life goes only down

sorry for the buzz... 2012/9/26 Brandon Allbery > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Michael Schuh wrote: > >> hmm, may be. >> i didn't thinked about that lithium charging feature. >> you may right with that. >> > > Yes you are right with that point. I have watched batteries cycle like that on OS

Re: [Solved, I think] IPv6 default route. Can't see the wood for the trees.

On 28/08/2012 02:23, Mark Andrews wrote: In message <503bcb0a.6000...@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton writes: On 8/27/2012 12:27 PM, Christian Laursen wrote: On 08/27/12 21:03, John Hawkes-Reed wrote: On 27/08/2012 19:06, Christian Laursen wrote: On 08/27/12 18:49, John Hawkes-Reed wrote: rc.conf:

Re: error install net-mgmt/net-snmp on 9.1 PRE-RELEASE [SOLVED]

I follow this link http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet/sctp_uio.h?r1=238790&r2=238789&pathrev=238790 and solved my problem tks On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Denis Granato wrote: > Good afternoon guys. > > I'm trying to install net-snmp on a 9.1 PRE-

Re: SOLVED: Time Clock Stops in FreeBSD 9.0 guest running under ESXi 5.0

--- On Aug 3, 2012, at 3:59 AM, Adam Strohl wrote: > Doh, correct URL for the forum post is: > http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31929&page=2 > > On 8/3/2012 14:38, Adam Strohl wrote: >> Just a heads up on the original issue, which is FreeBSD's timer/clock >> stopping under ESXi 5.0

Re: SOLVED: Time Clock Stops in FreeBSD 9.0 guest running under ESXi 5.0

Doh, correct URL for the forum post is: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31929&page=2 On 8/3/2012 14:38, Adam Strohl wrote: Just a heads up on the original issue, which is FreeBSD's timer/clock stopping under ESXi 5.0 and some later versions of VMware Workstation. I've gotten a few di

  1   2   3   4   5   >